[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Is Lacan the biggest pseud ever?
>Listen up, chud! Sure, you may have found concrete evidence that niggers are bad, BUT because you looked for it with the expecation of finding it, then that means that it is invalid, even if objective reality states otherwise.
Why does anybody take this reverse-idealist seriously?
>>
>>25274790
what lacan have you read?
>>
>>25274790
you have not read Lacan, nor (apparenty) any other philosophy
>>
>>25274790
>is lacan.... biggest pseud...
he ranks atleast after all the posters on this board



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.