>>25274847
Stop doing online tests. Stop doing online job interviews. Stop using computers as a way to measure competence and skill. Problem solved.

But no. Institutions would rather keep using digital tech and complain about cheaters because it makes their jobs easier.

>>25274847
kek I'm sure it was the method they used for cheating and not the change in student demographic admissions. All those other 133 years of students simply didn't have the means to cheat

>>25274856
Essays are a bit tougher. The best way forward would be to make them do gigaton of research, expect them to remember it and then write the essay in person. That would at raise the standards a lot I think even from the time before LLMs

>>25274884
It's an honor system. For 133 years no test was given with a professor or monitor in the room.
Your suggestion also kills the 133 year tradition of not needing to write the essay in person with nothing but a promise not to copy someone else.
You think these students cheating with AI if they were unsupervised in a room for a test wouldn't simply continue to cheat by copying off each other and bringing in notes?

>>25274856
We used to have maths exams without a calculator sometimes. We also used to have English exams which were surprise tasks like writing a short story in 2 hours without any prompts, or reading an article or essay with or without taking notes and then being tested on comprehension.
The calculator thing is the best analogy

Except the education system itself promotes cheating.
Studies confirm time and time again that when students are not graded they perform better, not to mention how schools themselves are just shitty places where you are punished for making mistakes or rewarded for being a good boyim and memorizing random boring irrelevant bullshit.
AI is just making things more obvious but there was enough cheating before that, so instead of blaming the tool you should be blaming the system that enables such behavior in the first place.

If someone can just speedrun through a degree and get a job I see nothing wrong with that, more power to them. This will never get addressed because tiutions are still getting paid.

Computers don't belong in schools. Just go back to pencil and paper for everything.

>>25274942
>Studies confirm time and time again that when students are not graded they perform better
How do you measure "better" without grading them?