Post some good ones like these.
critical thinking just can't be taught. it's impossible to imagine anyone reading these books who isn't hopelessly retarded
>>25278433How so? I feel like if it is possible to learn skills and knowledge over time implictly, then there should not be anything stopping you from learning it explictly. Is learning inheriently deterministic?
>>25278427
>>25278433This was my thought as well, though I'd imagine someone with the compulsion to at least attempt to learn 'critical thinking' is already a cut above the hopelessly retarded.There's a passage in Kant's First Critique about this:>Although the understanding is certainly capable of being instructed and equipped through rules, the power of judgment is a special talent that cannot be taught but only practiced. Thus this is also what is specific to so-called mother-wit, the lack of which cannot be made good by any school; for although such a school can provide a limited understanding with plenty of rules borrowed from the insight of others and as it were graft these onto it, nevertheless the faculty for making use of them correctly must belong to the student himself, and in the absence of such a natural gift no rule that one might prescribe to him for this aim is safe from misuse. The lack of the power of judgment is that which is properly called stupidity, and such a failing is not to be helped.
>>25278427If you get training in philosophy for three to five years it is possible that you may develop critical thinking, otherwise it is highly unlikely.
>>25278427Thinking as a Science - Henry Hazlitt>https://cdn.mises.org/Thinking%20as%20a%20Science_3.pdf
>>25278427Aristotle Organon.
>>25278427https://archive.org/details/artoflogicalthin00atkihttps://archive.org/details/logicorrightuseo00watthttps://archive.org/details/logick_2507_librivoxhttps://archive.org/details/the-trivium-the-liberal-arts-of-logic-grammar-and-rhetoric-sister-miriam-josephhttps://www.juristpanel.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/A-Rulebook-for-Arguments_compressed.pdfhttps://youtu.be/AOcy6RHw7A8
>>25278433Wrong. That's what they brainwash people to think. You haven't studied one page of critical thinking, logic or trivium in your life.
Take the Trivium pill.
critical thinking = the Trivium
This was lits go to a few years back.
Iykyk
>>25278427Sorry chud, looks like the science has Debunked this already!https://pure.eur.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/56915413/Identifying_obstacles_to_transfer_of_critical_thinking_skills.pdf
>>25278427Need I say it?
>>25280576See >>25279266Critical thinking, which is a vague, ambiguos and stupid term, most likely by design, is just grammar, logic and rhetoric, and it's not innate. You're brainwashed and haven't studied grammar, logic and rhetoric (ie "critical thinking"). The entire purpose of school is to suppress critical thinking for the masses.
>>25278427good thread anon, thanks.t. uneducated midwit forced to witness educated midwits and actual smart people being magically guided
>>25278433This
>>25278427just learn math????
