>>25287669
We have recently entered a hypercritical age wherein it is no longer sufficient to hide beyond the ethos of accumulated credibility and authority when attempting to propose something dramatically contradictory to established belief.

Now, such attempts can actually singlehandedly destroy said credibility, particularly if cracks of faith had already formed prior.

In other words, such things don't convince people of anything but that the source's time has passed and that it is time to move on from them.

>>25287669
The west is gonna sympathy and tolerance itself unto a brownoid grave

>>25287726
The "proof" lies in white men falling. There is nothing more abhorrent than a hero who fails. Pulling you apart is your punishment for failing to maintain the stranglehold. There is no rational argument that may be made against this, it is fundamental to human nature which is not rational.

>>25287757
A little boy abandoned in the wilderness with no guidance nor supply will most likely not survive, no matter his pedigree. That is not a fair metric of success.

>>25287669
ebonics speaking retards like yourself are part of the problem

>>25287998
Unc finna crash out kek

>>25287669
I just finished reading this, I'm not sure why it's considered such a great novel.
I did like that it had a happy ending for all the characters though.

>>25288008
A woman wrote it

>>25287815
No natural element is going to respond to pleas of fairness. It's unfair, it's irrational. You will either die or you die a bit later. Whatever the case it really doesn't matter what fate the little boy endures, it happens.

>>25287669
Middlemarch sounds like the name of a tf2 map.

>>25288043
Bot post.

>>25288043
This brand of nihilism's teology is civilizational collapse, btw. If you're fine with that, carry on; but it's fundamentally incompatible with civilizational advancement the likes of which is exemplified by the Occident.

>>25288987
No, you just don't understand what it's saying.

>someone has a different opinion than me
>its so over

that the rankings were, in fact, ranked is what makes it egregious. if they were just the top 100 books in no particular order, I'd agree with most of the books.