>Finish 75th Anniversary ebook of 1984>>NOW READ THE EXCITING SEQUEL TO 1984, OFFICIALLY AUTHORIZED BY THE ORWELL ESTATE!! "JULIA!!" THE RIVETING FEMINIST SEQUEL THAT FOCUSES ON WINSTON SMITHS LOVER JULIA!! WRITTEN BY (((SANDRA NEWMAN)))!!!Just fucking kill me. This world is fucking doomed.
>>25287830Just don't read it Anon. It's really that simple.
So you're not gonna read it?
>>25287837>>25287838It's the PRINCIPLE OF THE MATTER! GODDAMN IT!
>>25287841What is the point of posting this? I feel like the irony you seem to be indicating would be better suited to Brave New World rather than 1984.
>>25287848Okay, feminist rat.
I wish I could get this mad about people publishing fanfiction of media they like in >2011+15 but I just can't.
>Newman hasn't proved herself a worthy successor of Orwell; she's outclassed himJesus fucking Christ..
>>25287830>1984 + 75 = 2026
>>25288198It was published in 1949 anon.
>>25287830It's a fanfiction feminist cash grab just don't fucking read it.
>>25287841Define principle. Define matter.
>Her fifth novel, The Men (2022), published by Grove Atlantic, recounts a story in which all people with a Y chromosome vanish from the face of the Earth.[8] The book was controversial, with some critical of its focus on biology and exclusion of trans women.[9][10] However, in The Telegraph, Claire Allfree cites discussion of trans women in the book, and in Publishers Weekly, David Varno says "The Men is at once accessible and surprisingly complex," and notes that "trans characters do feature in it."[11][12] In a review for The Times, Jessa Crispin described The Men as "the most ill-conceived and badly executed novel of the year".[13] In Financial Times, Erica Wagner wrote that the novel was a "confused and confusing book, a tangled mess of threads that never knit up into a satisfying whole."[14] In The Spectator, Sarah Ditum called The Men "a gripping, haunting novel," and in The Telegraph, Nina Power called it "compelling and enjoyable."[15][16]Just another one of those authors virtue signaling journalists love that don't have an audience
Nobody tell OP about The Daughter of Doctor Moreau or the Chinese feminist Treasure Island.
>>25288745That's literally the plot of Y The Last Man. Does she just not have any original ideas at all?
>>25287830I just finished reading a lukewarm liberal who repeatedly shilled for lukewarm liberalism and you wouldn‘t believe the culmination of his legacy after 75 years of exactly what he wanted.
>Ummm... Orwell was a commie ackchually Retard.
>>25287830>ebooksYou get what you fuckin deserve
>>25288733Define definition.
>>25289339Suck my dick, luddite.
Why didn’t they just call it 1985?
>>25289395Apparently there's a satirical spoof of 1984 called 1985 made by some Italian guy but I can't find a copy of it anywhere.
>>25289400You’re retarded. Anthony Burgess wrote 1985. Do you retards not read?
>>25289415Nope. His name was György Dalos. You're the retard here in fact.
>>25289228/thread
>>25289424Stop replying to your own posts in agreement, cocksucker
>>25289152Have you heard of Call Me Ishamelle, the feminist retelling of Moby Dick? The author describes ships sailing on windless days, and she calls the bow “the front of the ship.” I thought it was just some irrelevant academic slop but then I started seeing it prominently displayed in bookstores
>>25289895LMAO
>>25289895it was a cold tuesday morn when i enrolled in the nantucket navy...
>>25287830Read it bitch
>>25289905No.
>>25289911nice dubs
>>25289917My cat is also more based than yours as well.
>>25289439Thank you first anon
>>25289923That proves nothing. If I replied to my own post it would also say (You)
>>25289931If somebody else (You) replied to a later post of mine then theirs would say (You) if in fact that was what it was.
Nobody cares, homo.
>>25289936Assuming you’re the same guy who just didn’t tag me like a coward: I‘m sick of seeing this dumbass claim anytime it‘s inconvenient for particularly retarded anons that two people agree.
>>25289921nice
No one cares, faggot.
>>25289917>>25289921>>25289967The CUTEST
