its not even good
>>25288972I've only read Trifles for a Massacre but there's no way you read that one and came to that conclusion. Unless you were actually expecting to learn something new.
>>25289000I heard people whining about it so i read it. I like celines novels but not really this
>>25289024Well I'm kinda the opposite. I wasn't a fan of the three Celine novels I read but loved how personal and strangely beautiful Trifles for a Massacre was.
>>25289027I liked school for corpses better so i think you should read the whole thing
>>25289042That's good to hear, thanks. I will
>>25288972maybe dostoyevsky would be more of a fit for you then
>>25289054sorry, I dont read YA
>>252889724chan? Yeah, I agree. It's shit.
>>25288972Bagatelles is the best pamphlet ever written on any subject, and the two others are among the close competition. The slow descent into orgasmic call for genocide because some Jewish critic has bad taste in ballet was a hard sell but it just works. I only read them recently for whatever reasons and nothing comes close to nailing "billions must die" in literate form.
>>25288972I appreciate that in one of the pamphlets he named C.F. Ramuz as one of his few respected contemporaries. I would've probably never heard of the guy otherwise and he's great
>>25288972Are these is propaganda pamphlets? They are only useful for studying fascism.
Aren't those pamphlets mega banned in most western countries?
>>25289506Only the countries Hitler invaded.
>>25289506i had to import this copy and i dont think its been translated
>>25288972Céline's pamphlets are what people expect when they want to read Mein Kampf.
