[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/m/ - Mecha

Name
Spoiler?[]
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File[]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


Here's your MK-II with Jegan parts
>>
he cute
>>
>>23589763
P-Bandai when?
>>
>>23589763
P-Bandai when?
>>
>>23589763
Better be piloted by the second coming of Amuro Ray, Elle Vienno.
>>
>>23589763
Why would anyone keep using a MKII? Shouldn't they put it in a museum somewhere?
>>
>>23589914
It's the M1911 of UC MS
>>
>>23589914
MKII in UC9X isn't even that old compared to the WWII tanks used in a certain frontline right now
>>
I look like the MK-II IRL
>>
>>23589914
From a standpoint that only 3 of those were made you're correct, but generally speaking you'd prefer to sit in a cockpit of Mk-II than in Jegan.
>>
>>23589763
The Jegan needs a Revive kit. Otherwise, expert builders will just use the older HGUC Mk-II and not the Revive for the Gundam Mk-II Custom. The Master Grade is also an option, if you are patient enough to swap hip joints.
>>
>>23589763
>Wizards Gundam

God I hope that name doesn't stick.
>>
>>23589950
Four were actually made.
>>
>>23589763
Works surprisingly well. Would paint in Nemo colors
>>
I know Banager uses a MKII with a beefed up right arm for the Beam Magnum in some UC 9X mangs but it begs the question: how does the older MKII compare to a newer Jegan?
>>
>>23589927
Ah so UC conflicts are also just a show to get rid of old inventory and bill taxpayers for replacements?
>>
>>23592209
Going by raw numbers the MK2 has half again more thrust and acceleration than the jegan, but half the verniers and less sensor range, so I'm guessing it would be an overall less responsive but more powerful.
>>
>>23592307
You should probably ignore any numbers not written by the same person/group with the intention of being compared.
>>
File: Gundam MK-II.jpg (642 KB, 1482x2089)
642 KB
642 KB JPG
>>23592307
>Going by raw numbers

You should only ever do this to calculate the difference between MS within the same series (and even then, they tend to be WAY higher or WAY lower than their size or speed would imply.)

Otherwise, 0080 MS would be top of the line as of the 0090's, more or less. Gundam's technical specs tend to be pretty dogshit, even completely nonsensical, sometimes. The weight specs and the average generator outputs make this VERY evident.
>>
File: volume18.jpg (622 KB, 1200x1700)
622 KB
622 KB JPG
>That time when Gopp assigned a Mk II to Yazan >he did it as a joke
>>
>>23593271
>>23592307
It would still make sense that Mk II was inferior to the Jegan as GM IIIs were essentially GMs with Mk II parts. Banrise just has boner for resurrecting it in mangas, probabaly for P-bandai potential
>>
>>23592209
Roughly speaking? Its contemporary Dijeh styled on MS like Gustav Karl and Anksha in Narrative. What makes you think that a comparably cheaper Jegan would do better against an ace mobile suit from Gryps and First Neo Zeon wars?
>>
>>23593311
GM III being based on Mk-II is exaggerated.
It basically just got a knock-off version of Mk-II backpack, beam rifle and leg thrusters, at the core it was the good old OYW GM.
>>
>>23593311
>probabaly for P-bandai potential
They haven't made any merch of the Banagher Mark II or the Yazan recolor... yet.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.