>>42878055>>42878038Glad there's still some sense and nonbot posters on this cambodian basketweaving chinese booru.>>42878009>>42877988>>42877849Rarityfags your lips open and around my Chad cock. NOW. A Rarityfag's mouth's place is around Chad's cock for sucking not for talking. Also give me suggestions for which text font, size, color to use, what images to use and how to reduce the filesize of this 3.07 MB file back to 1.41MB BEFORE I post it to Derpibooru.YES I am going to post this on Derpibooru just like I did with my Virgin S2 vs Stacy S1 Luna chart.
I think adding a mini Chad saying Yes would add to the meme value, don't you think? or shall I keep it subtle and let others react to it with the Chad meme?
Beautiful.
>>42878182Yeah, huh, what fucking *usual* business is that fag talking about? Rarity has no usual business at that point; she is a failed poorfag sweatshop slave at that point of time (which makes sense considering she lives in bumfuck Ponyville, where nopony wears clothes, which is why she has to take orders from Canterlot). We literally see in Green Isn't Your Color that nopony, even those living in Ponyville, don't know who the fuck Rarity is. I'm flabbergasted by how Rarity managed to stay afloat before she blew up.
>Gypsy threadIgnored
>>42878210He was an obvious griffonfag. What's funny is that 99% of the fandom back in 2013 and even now in that recent thread still believe Fluttershy was in the wrong after her being the one to help finish Rarity's dress and her showing that blueprint to Rarity while whority fucks it up. They completely ignored that design and the end and just focused on the idiotballing not even aware the characters are being forced to hold the idiotball to make the plot flow.
>>42878182You can't tame kino. You can only guide it.
>>42878182You sound like a bigger cockgobbling faggot than the original poster of that pic so I'll just keep believing Fluttershy is wrong.
>>42878313>griffonfag who lusts after Rarity
>>42878182Yep Vogelgod is entering Equestria alright. He truly is a rarity among us.
>>42878182>*SMACK*Go back to watching tamerslop, unoriginal faggot
>>42878392Nobody has any idea what you're talking about other than you outted yourself as a tamersfag yourself. Projecting gen-alpha?
If there was ever clear proof that vogelfag is a delusional midwit, OP pic is it. Just read that barely coherent drivel and realize this retard genuinely believes he's intelligent.
>>42878498>>42878392If there was ever clear proof that the average /mlp/ user is a delusional midwit, OP pic is it. Just read that barely coherent drivel and realize this retard genuinely believes he's intelligent and cannot accept that he got his ass torn apart by OP.
>>42878498I know you, you're that pessimistic Dunning-Kruger faggot that said he was utterly delusional and retarded about Fausticorn being voiced by Lauren Faust herself in the Shawn Keller video, only for him to once again be right about it. VogelGod is always right.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GAK58RX7tVwVogelgod does it again. Yes again.> just like I did with my Virgin S2 vs Stacy S1 Luna chart.Newfags don't know what he's referring to.
this is so poorly argued that i don't think it's possible to read it and come to the conclusion that fluttershy is correct.
>>42878540>>42878498It's over, OP won and you LOST: THE GAME. You're looking like a retard flailing around like a fish out of water.
>>42878182>>42878539>15 fucking years, the anon who made that meme is probably dead by now.>Lauren Faust and Shawn Keller really do know each other.Vogelfag I KNEEL. I KNEEL. TEACH ME THIS FORM OF POWER.
>>42878182For the longest time I thought toile was a high quality and expensive fabric.>cotton calico fabric>Traditionally toiles are made in cotton calico fabric as they are used for fitting and design purposes, not for ever wearing as a finished garment.>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CH3lNXrPBmc&t=73sI kneel.
>>42878182>>42878579"ANALysts" Vs Based Schizoposters communing with ancient beings and learning forbidden knowledge such as Lauren Faust's middle name... by simply googling the correct questions.
>>42878182Based. Too bad Shy was best season 1 pony but went downhill after that
>>42878182I think the funniest part is that Vogel is using the original anon's own images against him. Basically slapping him over the head and telling him he's blind and that he already posted the arms, the middy collar, the shawl lapel, the uneven pleats, everything.
>>42878613It really was that. He had all the images right there but pretended they didn't exist or meant something else entirely. All OP had to do was say yes to everything, practically letting the original meme creator make an ass of himself. He never once had to blatantly say no and provide extra info beyond a few things like what toile is.He even has so much snowpity he's actually bothered with the word "business" and his instincts are right.
>>42878182>>42878539>YES I am going to post this on Derpibooru just like I did with my Virgin S2 vs Stacy S1 Luna chart.>Newfags don't know what he's referring to.Okay I have no idea what that is. Somebody post it, please.
>>42878647Holy newfag. I'm a 2019 transplant and even I know what that is.
>>42878182AAAHHH WHO ARE YOU?
so this thread is just 90% samefagging, right?
>>42879459No, but you're a bot. Nice lack of capitals.
>>42878182This is even more autistic than the whole "the Death Star would've had its own gravity" bullshit from the Star Wars giganerds. Don't even try to @ me, chud.
@(You)>>42879465>chudAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA>A mutt posterOf course my horse! Get out of here, mutt.
>>42879459No but you are.>>42878647Someone show this newfag da wae.
>>42879465https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i3iIKtpVmJQThe average brony analyst loses to the weakest Star Wars and Star Trek analyst.But the strongest Star Wars sci-fi analyst loses to VogelGod.So you can get a sense of power level.
>>42879453The Maiar.
>>42879483The average pony loses to the weakest dragonBut the strongest dragon loses to Celestia
>>42878182this is so stupid i'm gonna make a debunk for this """debunk""" in a bit.
>>42879642With those lack of capitals I'd love to see you try.Also somebody will debunk your debunk of the debunk of that debunk which will end up in a 4x debunk loop which completes a cycle.
>>42878182This still needs editing, it is indeed messy.>Also give me suggestions for which text font, size, color to use, what images to use and how to reduce the filesize of this 3.07 MB file back to 1.41MB BEFORE I post it to Derpibooru.
>>42878991>>42878647Well what is it then?
>>42878182Thank you for defending my waifu's honor, but never speak to her ever again
>>42879692Your waifu should feel honored for VogelGod to speak to her.
>>42879692Don't worry. He's not the type of lawyer to sleep with his clients ... because Pinkie and Fluttershy are his least liked main characters. So it's actually funny that he's defending yelllow over white when he had nothing but good things to say about Rarity's character.
>>42879764I can’t imagine anything more pathetic than knowing some namefag’s favorite pony rankings. I’m just going to assume you’re him and pretending not to be because that’s less embarrassing.
>>42879804Vogelfaggot BTFO
>>42879804I was really on OP's side until I saw this. I guess Vogelfag actually is kind of stupid...
>>42879847You are the epitome of cattlethink. You only see the words "DEBUNK" and your brain goes complete shut-off mode. You literally cannot think for yourself, but desperately need others to feed you your information. First, Vogel:>Oh my stars, he deboonked the scene with 10 minutes of research, that must be right, so smartAnd then you see another deboonk to the deboonk and think the same thing. You have no pride in having your own opinions; your own autonomy? Pathetic zero literacy cretin.
>>42879876
>>42878182We don't need to crank out 40 more nested images if we're arguing good and proper at this point. Maybe update again when we're done.>not a dress or a blanketIs a top stitch not a top stitch? Does it matter what the thread has been shoved through? I would think all that matters is if the thread is weaved in the proper shape. If not, that's a really niche point which the average human wouldn't understand without being told, preferably with some kind of support.Are these serviceable displays of those kinds of stitches or not?Are you simply nitpicking to fit the tone? If so, there's an issue, where the tone you're using is generally reserved for overly aggressive criticism. That means the fact you're telling this joke implies you should also be making some kind of a point. If not, then that means you've already begun dabbing and doing a touchdown dance over points you've already made, which would make the rest of the lower half of the image make more sense, but that means your justification now rests on the sheer heft of your earlier corrections. If you look like a small fool above, doing a celebratory dance makes you look like a big fool now.>pleatsDunno what you're talking about. Again, this is specialized lingo which the average person has no reason to know. Sure, you called him an idiot, but when I look up pleats I get things which look like what he says pleats are, and when I look up layers I get things that look... a small amount like what he says layers are. I can't even disagree with you, because you didn't really argue.If your actual point was that it shouldn't matter if fluttershy used the wrong word when she's correct about the uneven construction on the dress, that's valid, but in that case the unsupported ESL nonsense distracts from that stronger point.>The arm's a size We don't call the long part of a tall boot an "arm", and we don't seem to call the long part of a glove an arm, but there's an issue with that. Horses aren't humans. Their boots are not our boots. Maybe when it's on a horse dress it's called an arm. Maybe it's not, but fluttershy called it an arm, which should ultimately be understandable equish to rarity regardless. This point comes out to be weak for both sides on its own, in that we can't pin down what she meant or how she meant it enough to say if she's an idiot or not. That means dunking on her, here, is again justified on the assumption of corroborating points.>red dressSome imagined artist's rendition of a dress that's way to red and unfitting doesn't make rarity an idiot. If anything, she's smart for throwing that shit out, if it would have turned out like that. Nothing but a matter of taste. A tossup, again.
>>42879926>The Shawl collarThe whole reason the lapel is "shawl" seems to be that it's smooth and unbroken, a single smooth piece from the belly to the neck. In the shot where the thing on her neck looks smooth, it also looks like a thin simple ribbon, like a necklaceA midday collar, though results vary, seems to refer not to the knot in front of the sailor, but to the large flat thing draped on their shoulders. The large flat object fluttershy has at the time is the blue butterfly object which functions as a pendant, or really a chest decoration. So, by form, we would assume the midday collar is the butterfly and the shawl lapel is the green ribbon. But, by location, we would assume that the collar is the thin necklace and the shawl lapel is the detailed angular butterfly. If I stretch extra hard and try to FORCE this shit to work, then I would have to assume the butterfly splits open so that fluttershy can walk out of her dress like a tuxedo shirt, which is bonkers. Both these definitions have been stretched beyond their breaking points. However, we can say that rarity is the one who created something which defies easy labeling using human lexicon, which would again mean that fluttershy is gesturing at what she means where the actual language doesn't exist, or else that the collar is actually that blue fucking ribbon on fluttershy's back somehow.>machine stitchedNow here's where you've outright lost the plot. Both you and the OP agree that it's machine stitched. That's not the accusation. You're failing to target and disprove the argument given. The issue is that fluttershy is acting as a critic here, and she is being critiqued for her skill as a critic. When she presents the fact that it is machine stitched as a critique, she presents the idea that this is a problem, a point against the dress in any way. That is the point which fluttershy can be wrong or right about. If we're extra nice to fluttershy, we can say her criticisms aren't demands or expectations, but attempts at objective expression of the quality of the dress. In that case, there's just two relevant questions. 1: Does machine stitching present an aestetic which is perceived as being lower quality in pony society or otherwise mechanically diminish the function or longevity of the dress?2. Could fluttershy actually tell?Well, if fluttershy knows her shit, then she could tell, but that's what we're arguing about and that's what we're trying to display with this exact point, meaning that this point is circular. If fluttershy knows her stuff, then she was right here. If she doesn't, then she was wrong and it was maybe and coincidence that rarity really did use a machine stitch. >The last fucking pointSo, for you and for him, it comes down to this. Every other subjective point is balanced between "further proof of flutter's stupidity" and "nothing burger"
>>42879928>Toile>2 definitions>One is a blank cheap undyed fabric, which is not what fluttershy is wearing>The other one is detailed printed fabric "used for decor AND clothing"So your argument comes down to one of two things. Either you misunderstood and thought all toile was cheap because people put it on walls, or toile actually IS cheap. So, is it?>In upper-class (primarily American, but also northern European) society, toile is often seen on dresses or aprons used at such events as country-themed garden parties or tea parties. >in upper-class -seen on dressesNope, that's an implication. We need more.>--in the late 18th century thanks to Christophe-Philipe Oberkampf, a German industrialist who set up a fabric factory in a small French town outside of Paris, Jouy-en-Josas. So that's lets say 1780 or whatever.>Kennedy decorated the White House with the coveted French fabric. That's 1963-ishWild west was 18 65 to up to 1924Sky scrapers wikipedia page says they started with the big recognisable skyscrapers in manehattan around 1900s or 1890s or whatever, but that's good enoug for our purposes.That's where they got their name, this is effectively when they got invented.Apparently "modern reproductions" of toile are much less expensive, for obvious reasons. Mass consumption of toile seems to have started around 1970, and more in 2000, though I can't pin down a specific quote I'm willing to use to support this. It's just kind of suggested without proper support.So, equestria isn't earth. It's not America. It's got mongols and Japanese and a single African. Technologically, it's a mess, and proud of it. Culturally, it's vaguely in the past, most of the time. However, I'll just have you look yourself in the eyes and answer the following question. Do you think equestria is the kind of place which has methods of mass production that started in the 1970's and cheapened articles of high value and extreme artistry via the application of extremely complicated and efficient machine manufacturing, or is it the kind of place where being a skilled artisan meant something?The toile's expensive, or at least not cheep.
>>42879926Also, Fluttershy says "the armscye's tight" not "the arm's a size tight". Just for clarification. The armscye is the opening for an armhole. Obviously, Fluttershy's dress has no armhole. Well, considering Equine anatomy, it could maybe refer to the neckpiece that is supposed to be too tight actually.
>>42879950You get a fucking (you) you literate boy
