File: 1766159591544816.png (247 KB, 729x567)

247 KB PNG

>>43095705
from what I read online Haiku is getting it's last beta release pretty soon, with next major release finally being R1
one of the features of Haiku that interest is its filesystem-level tagging system that allows you to pretty much make a booru out of your image folder. Would it be a good OS for my X220 laptop?

>page 8 in three hours
wat

File: 633b44554489455f0e0de8d3f(...).png (150 KB, 448x578)

150 KB PNG

Not to be a downer less than five posts in the thread but cuck washing of code bases is starting
https://github.com/chardet/chardet
https://github.com/chardet/chardet/issues/327
I wonder when first big copyright lawsuit over something like this happens.

>>43096205
just abolish IP laws already
imagine leaked Win 10 source code being public domain

>>43096205
The GPL is the only open source license that has been legally found to be enforceable. But only the FSF has the finances to pursue legal means and they're been corrupted from the inside out, so...

Funny how they try to stifle any discussion on this though, especially this one which rightfully asserts that their aislop rewrite cannot be copyrighted since they did not even write it: https://github.com/chardet/chardet/issues/325

>>43096246
>But only the FSF has the finances to pursue legal means and they're been corrupted from the inside out, so...
there's SFLC that gives legal support pro bono

>>43096230
I wish, some people hope that the weakened US position might open door for some copyright reforms but I don't have high hopes.
In my country we have literal copyright mafia that requires you to pay when playing your own songs in public gatherings so they could protect you.
>>43096246
>corrupted from the inside out, so
I wasn't paying much attention but I hope it's not that bad yet, the last suspicious thing I registered was when they didn't say anything about IBM and RedHat terminating contracts upon sharing GPL code
>>43096254
That's very interesting, never heard about them

>>43096276
>I wish, some people hope that the weakened US position might open door for some copyright reforms but I don't have high hopes.
IMO Trump's pushing hard on AI might change the laws to more sane time limits and/or "fair use" requirements

bump

>>43096347
I think that if they'll do anything at all, they'll make pretty damn sure it'll be worse for everyone except AI companies and Disney (or they just won't enforce inconvenient violations)

>>43096842
>Disney
nah their last feud with Republicans in Florida resulted in Congress shitposting with anti-mickey mouse copyright reduction act
they definitely lost their ability to lobby properly (I hope)

>>43097989
she should switch to Qt before it's too late

>>43098070
They don't have the manpower for that. Didn't Xfce see no development for over a year at one point?

Their best bet (along with the maintainers of other distros based on GTK3) is to just fork GTK3 and maintain it with each other and give GNOME the middle finger it deserves.

>>43098104
>Didn't Xfce see no development for over a year at one point?
sounds more like MATE
XFCE is pretty much everyone go-to option after GNOME and KDE

>>43098107
>everyone
everyone's
>>43098104
>Their best bet (along with the maintainers of other distros based on GTK3) is to just fork GTK3 and maintain it with each other and give GNOME the middle finger it deserves.
I hope Mint guys manage to pull something off for their Cinnamon

>>43098113
It's interesting times ahead at least. Either a lot of DEs will go under or change drastically or they become truly independent from GNOME. That should be better for the Linux ecosystem in the end. Actually, the worst thing would be if GNOME said something like "Because so many projects are still dependent on GTK3, we won't cancel its support".

File: 1751338307837756.webm (251 KB, 608x608)

251 KB WEBM

>>43098119
come on now, pic rel is too reddit to help the community

File: you gotta SHARE your gott(...).gif (208 KB, 365x280)

208 KB GIF

>>43095705
oh hey my favorite thread is back!
So far I've been working more on my podman and niche networking autism and this has culminated in me giving yggdrasil a look.
But I wasn't too happy it basically goatsees everything you got running locally to its network without proper firewall rules.

So I made it into a container, you can find the sauce here: https://files.catbox.moe/8gzbm8.zip

Basically this allows you to expose anything you want onto yggdrasil, just generate a config file, add some public peers, pass it to the container and you're good to say what you wanna expose onto yggdrasil and as a nice bonus you can even make the port it runs on locally a different one in yggdrasil so you could totally have something running on port 69420 be accessible on port 80 in your yggdrasil IP.

The compose file I linked has jellyfin as an example but you can use whatever it is that you want or just pass an IP and a port.

In short this thing allows you to share stuff via yggdrasil. Why does it matter? It means you're free to access whatever you want, without an account remotely and glowies cannot do anything about it. Even if you're behind CGNAT.
If you want to make let's say a private minecraft server for you and your friends just get them to install yggdrasil on their machine have them add peers then they can just punch in your yggdrasil's v6 address and you're on! If you wanna be sure only your friends can connect nothing simple just set ufw to deny all incoming traffic except for the one coming from your friend's yggdrasil IPs. None of these IPs will ever change as they are tied to your identity on the yggdrasil network.

Even shorter: anon is tired of ngrok so he uses basement dweller shit to get his way.

>>43098135
>yggdrasil
why the fuck random random software projects are called like that? It doesn't sound as generic as, say, foobar
Never bothered to google that

File: 1748215469729761.jpg (100 KB, 945x945)

100 KB JPG

>>43098138
Who knows? Big nordic tree, roots, network? You tell me.
I'd have called it spaghetti, that's more fitting for a networking project.

>>43098135
Sounds interesting. Anything to escape big corpo internet. But the project says it doesn't guarantee anonymity, so what exactly is the point of it compared to say an .onion or .i2p page?

By the way, does anybody have any experience setting up IPFS nodes? How does that work exactly, how do you guarantee what you pin stays available to everyone without serving the file yourself indefinitely?

File: 1769169139155765.png (303 KB, 949x705)

303 KB PNG

>>43098174
>The project says it doesn't guarantee anonymity
That is correct. It's not an anonymous network at all from what I have read.
By that I mean peers know you are and where your traffic goes, just like the internet.
However, note that peers cannot know what it is you're sending over the wire as everything is end to end encrypted.
Think of it as an internet alternative your ISP can't block and that has pretty much the same use case as tailscale / zerotier without accounts.

For anonymous use one cool thing you can do is use it as a gateway for i2p so you can use it to access i2p over Yggdrasil which makes blocking your i2p access from your ISP impossible and does guarantee anonymity as the only thing you'd see coming through Yggdrasil is doubly encrypted noise via i2p's NTP / SSU wrapped inside yggdrasil's e2ee.

>IPFS
I haven't tried that but that'd be worth a look. It doesn't seem too complicated.

>>43098135
Btw I'm a dumbass and forgot to specify your config file need to have this line in it:

AdminListen: unix:///tmp/yggdrasil.sock

Else the containers will bitch about privileges as it tries to create the socket it listens on for connections in a place the container user can't reach.

>>43098190
>i2p over Yggdrasil
Wouldn't it make more sense to use Yggdrasil over I2P?

>>43098204
You could? But I don't see the point over using an outptoxy to the clearnet instead?
I2p over Yggdrasil just means to use Yggdrasil as a gateway to i2p if i2p nodes are blocked or something.
It really boils down to what you want to access. If you want to anonymously access sites on Yggdrasil (there pretty much isn't any) then sure Yggdrasil over i2p is perfect.

File: 1750536250727186.png (67 KB, 796x522)

67 KB PNG

ponebin is down REEEEEEEEEEEE

Bump

>not a single software project uses pony as their mascot
literally how

>>43095731
>check GSoC thread on dev forums
>"20206"
>"I’m Anuj Billore, CS Student from India."
>vibewritten OP that lists things that are already implemented
nuke India

>>43098575
Seems to work fine now, at least over here. Also, you should be posting about this in /fast/ rather than here (if it doesn't exist just create a new thread).

>>43099939
>(if it doesn't exist just create a new thread)
nah that's gay and retarded

>>43099944
Then suffer in silence.

>>43099520
I'm pretty sure I saw at least one moderately popular but I don't remember the name

>>43100523
niri doesn't count because it's a joke for those who know

>>43100534
I don't think it was niri. Sadly the software was irrelevant for me so I don't remember much, but I remember there being Github issue where they explicitly discussed the mascot being a pony (somebody asked about it iirc)

>>43100563
you intrigue me
what was that piece of software for? Was it a text editor? Some browser extension? An irc client?

>>43100563
>Github issue where they explicitly discussed the mascot being a pony
Hahaha, nice. Love to see normalfags seethe at the presence of ponies.

>>43100624
we are truly the Jews on the Internet

File: 266295.png (231 KB, 1130x639)

231 KB PNG

>>43100576
I wish I knew. But at this point you know as much as I remember. I'll try to go thru my bookmarks once my head stops killing me, but I don't think I bookmarked it
>>43100624
It was mostly just question which was then confirmed. If it was seething I would have totally saved it to my /pts/ to-post list

>>43100663
>It was mostly just question which was then confirmed.
Oh okay, I just assumed seething because you called it an issue.

>>43100694
I see kek, I meant Github Issue

where the fuck is my pebble time 2 so I can put ponies on my wrist at all times

>>43101214
>using a wristwatch in 2026

>>43099520
not mascot but microg's author has had a pony pfp since forever and nobody seems to notice or care

>>43104149
>decide to check it out
>it's reddit upvote pony
Grim

>>43104190
monkeypaw situation. maybe if he had a ponified microg logo he'd change his pfp to that. I'll... make the logo.

File: 994036.png (147 KB, 460x460)

147 KB PNG

>>43103876
>IE was shit
>Edge 1.0 was shit
>Edge 2.0 is still shit
how does Microsoft do it?
>>43104149
kek based
>>43104190
kek cringe

reminds me of the legendary "pony resume" guy being responsible for iirc camera stabilization code in Android

>>43104503
https://pjreddie.com/

>>43104503
Edge is shit.
Chrome is shit.
Firefox is shit.
Librewolf is a little less shit.
Pale Moon is furry shit and nowadays in general shit as well.

Where are we supposed to go?

>>43104834
I'm talking about level of shittyness that's always above average
IE was cancerous during first browser wars and fucking unusable in 21st century
Edge 1.0 never fucking functioned properly
current chrome-based is so awful Microsoft had to make dalle only usable with "Edge" in User-Agent

>>43104857
>chrome-based
Edge, if that wasn't obvious
>>43104834
>Where are we supposed to go?
ladybird

>>43104857
>IE was cancerous during first browser wars
No, IE was actually better than Netscape at one point and I also switched to it at the time for the simple reason that Netscape decided to be a "suite" filled with shit nobody needed (same with Altavista and Google which happened around the same time, this dumb idea that tacking on useless shit makes things better). The browser was the slowest PoS imaginable back then and that's why their project only became interesting again once they dumped all the excess baggage and developed Firefox. But they don't seem to have learned from this at all, because they keep bringing in shit nobody wants and aping Chrome when nobody who uses Firefox wants those features anyway, otherwise they wouldn't be using Firefox in the first place.

>>43104859
>ladybird
It's important to ask nowadays: who finances them, and are they hellbent on implementing every feature (including clear anti-user features) that some "standards body" like the WHATWG that is really run by big corporations decides to develop?

File: 1770997901491038.jpg (2.25 MB, 3264x1836)

2.25 MB JPG

>>43104863
I was born in 200x so don't know how IE was actually used back in the 90s, but reading stuff about M$ just breaking every single standard to make content locked to IE feels insane
>But they don't seem to have learned from this at all, because they keep bringing in shit nobody wants and aping Chrome when nobody who uses Firefox wants those features anyway, otherwise they wouldn't be using Firefox in the first place.
depends on features desu
full page translations are pretty useful I guess
>>43104866
I hope they just make the most awful parts optional

File: 1757890454512982.png (316 KB, 728x740)

316 KB PNG

>Get my hands on a laptop from a coworker
>Decide to chuck Linux on it
>Won't let me boot into the usb because ???
>Go into bios and disable secure boot
>Now it lets me boot
>Problem B arises
>Can't wipe the drive and install Linux for some reason
>Try a partition manager
>No dice
>Turns out it's an intel ssd with some giga cucked configuration that doesn't like Linux
>Apparently there's a workaround but I can't be fucked to do it
>Have a better idea
>Rip open another pos laptop that I had lying around, swap out the ssd
>Let's me install Linux perfectly
I fucking hate technology lmao

>>43105458
this is why coreboot shouldn't be viewed as a meme

File: swappy-20260310-131917.png (862 KB, 1366x768)

862 KB PNG

Attempting a sort of Rainbow Dash themed rice for my Garuda Sway install on my college laptop. It’s unfinished at the moment, but I’m down for any suggestions.

>>43105677
>Garuda
good morning sir

>>43105677
>Garuda Linux
What's the use case exactly?

>>43098575
Ah yes, sorry. I was trying to back up the server and thin lvm kept kicking my ass.

Are there any desktop ponies that run on kde?

>>43105698
I’m aware
>>43105700
I used it on my desktop for over half a year and got comfortable using it enough to put it on my laptop. That’s honestly it.

File: rms.png (61 KB, 566x400)

61 KB PNG

Two days ago I emailed Stallman about age verification bullshit in Commiefornia
his response is rather short, but at least FSF is working on it

>>43106504
>OS-level
I'll be using whatever OS I want without whatever legal bullshit whatever country makes up that they decide should be included and they won't be able to do anything about it.

>>43105723
Qtponies should or DPE-gtk should work

File: 4chan.png (71 KB, 541x276)

71 KB PNG

>>43107070
>and they won't be able to do anything about it.
What are you talking about? These foreign governments can send angry emails to you

>>43107107
Funny how they really think they have any sway whatsoever. "Used to rule a third of the world..." really says it all.

File: spin.gif (1.47 MB, 450x360)

1.47 MB GIF

Let's put a bit lighthearted spin on this dire topic. What stuff would be agewalled in Equestria's web, and how would small ponies conspire to access it nonetheless? Don't say pr0n.

>>43107759
clop
^:)

>>43107759
I don't think anything would need to be agewalled on the Canternet, because ponies don't seem like the kind of characters to put vile stuff online in the first place. I guess since they're a species that developed to use sex as a means of strengthening bonds just like apes and we humans have they might have porn. Whether there's a lot of it or not depends on whether you headcanon estrus season to be "super horny mode" or just as regular levels of sexual activity (like we have all the time) while ponies are innocent outside of estrus. Also, since mares are not 3DPDs, incel/simp culture wouldn't exist in Equestria so there's less of a demand for porn since every mare and stallion will find his happily ever after one day.

>>43107759
you ask about contents of their version of the Internet but forget about technology
what would be their Protocols? Operating system(s)? Machines?
I feel like their 'puters might be Lisp machines for some reason

i live in cuckiefornia.
should i be scared?
running linux and grapheneOS btw
oh and pebbleOS

>>43108323
I am so sorry for you, Anon.

>>43108323
>i live in cuckiefornia.
You don't have to.

>>43108323
the law tries to regulate "OS providers", all of which are outside of Commiefornia (or, at the very least, free projects like gOS, Mint and others are outside of CA)
but yeah you should probably leave for a better state

Would you host your free software project in a "non-free" country like Russia if it was necessary to protect it from retarded "for the children" laws?

>>43109092
considering russia blocks sites like e621 and 4chan for their own heinous "crimes" (I forget, do they block derpi/pony boorus too?), I don't know if you'd fare any better over there

>>43109092
Anon, the state WILL fuck you over if you become an "issue" to them
age verification laws are already a failed legislature because of legal implications of the American 4th Amendment
>>43109119
>(I forget, do they block derpi/pony boorus too?),
ponerpics doesn't work here

>>43109129
>Anon, the state WILL fuck you over if you become an "issue" to them
Sure, but the difference is that unlike the "free" West, the Russians don't bother with small fries like fucking My Little Pony fans of all people. They actually understand they have real crimes to solve rather than go after imaginary boogeymen that just serve to make the legislator look like a good boi.

>>43109162
>the Russians don't bother with small fries like fucking My Little Pony fans of all people
are you sure about that?
>They actually understand they have real crimes to solve rather than go after imaginary boogeymen that just serve to make the legislator look like a good boi.
L M A O
M
A
O

>configuring my new laptop and setting everything up
>shut down, boot up to enter bios to check settings
>windows decides to force a random update between shutting down/booting up
>bitlocker bricks both of my drives complaining secure boot was tampered with
>fuck.mp3
>end up just saying “screw it” and wipe both drives and transfer to Linux Mint
thanks for giving the final straw to leave you Windows 11, I sure won’t miss you again.
Only thing I’m concerned about is my adobe animate/after effects programs, running them on Wine should work fine right? (Albeit one of them is a crack that needs to unpack a bunch of files via .exe)
Other then that I just configure protontricks and wine and I’m able to run most windows software if I really can’t find a alternative?

>>43109173
>running them on Wine should work fine right?
I don't use Adobe shitware but iirc you need specific versions of their software on specific versions on Wine
>Other then that I just configure protontricks and wine and I’m able to run most windows software if I really can’t find a alternative?
yep

>>43109164
Okay, maybe I should've worded it differently: they do want to go after ponyfags, like every normalfag, but they realize they don't have the resources for it, like, AT ALL and decide to use their manpower to solve the more significant crimes instead. Is that better?

>>43109173
I just run all Adobe shit (Acrobat for me) in a Windows 10 VM. No compatibility problems whatsoever.

>>43109183
Oh to add: a VM that has no connection to the internet, so I don't have to worry about dumb anti-piracy shit either.

>>43109180
>>43109185
I agree that modern adobe “software” is just bloated slop, stuff like flash CS6 gets straight to the point, I miss really minimal UI schemes instead of trying to make everything look “pretty” by rounding corners, doing stupid high fidelity icons, that sort of shit.

I’ve only got the 2015 versions of Animate and After Effects and 2015 Animate’s pretty much perfect for me.

>>43109181
>Is that better?
not really
you see, a rather large number of crimes committed these days comes from
>pardoned criminals who fought in the war
they don't want to police them IN ANY WAY
>retarded zoomers who have no hope for the future
they are easier to deal with, as the state can make a new scapegoat every fucking week
"Columbine community", "Satanist community", AУE, "Maньяки Кyльт Убийц" (whatever the fuck this is) and probably more
Believe me: when some Russian faggot follows American example and goes postal over Applejack the state will outlaw "brony community, /mlp/"

>>43109188
Yeah, Adobe hasn't really been adding anything useful to most of their tools since they went subscription-based. You can just use Photoshop CS6 and it will work just as well as their latest version would. Hell, I was using the copy of Photoshop 5.0 I got in high school way into the 2000s and it still served most of my needs. I'm just using Acrobat because if you're working with PDFs it's pretty much a necessity, especially to use the latest version.

>>43108323
I don't think where you live is going to have any impact, except for proprietary OSes maybe. For linux, the question is whether the devs will integrate something to satisfy the law or not.
The biggest legal risk is to organisations that aren't faceless random individuals, such as Canonical, Red Hat. The latter of these is a US business, so if their products are available in cali and cali decides to sue, they could genuinely be liable. But worse than these distributors is the Linux Foundation, which afaik is the main funding body for kernel development and is also US-based.
For the kernel, there's hopes that it doesn't quality as an "OS" and is legally not responsible for this. For small, non-corporate distros, there's a chance that they might make some token effort to block california and other affected states, probably trivially bypassable but might give them legal deniability. But they might also not want to "block" users even in a bypassable way - I remember seeing something from either Canonical or Debian about exploring compliance with the law, to be able to continue distributing in cali. More might follow suit.

There's also the very real risk that right now it's just one or two states, but eventually it will spread globally. Much like how ID verification was at first just a couple US states only for porn websites, then the UK made it mandatory for all kinds of websites and social media, and now it's being expanded to even more states and even more countries and even wider reach. The OS age verification passed in Cali and IIRC is in motion in two or three more states now and could easily be picked up by more countries and states. At that point it becomes less and less feasible to "just pretend to block the affected area(s)" and expect legal immunity, not to mention devs will be more and more likely to have their home country affected.

The other question is what will the age check even look like? From my cursory awareness of the laws, my understanding is that a simple unverified "enter your age: " text box would satisfy it. There is of course the risk that this is all a slippery slope and follow-up laws will quickly tighten this to require ID verification.
But since linux is open source, you will always be able to disable this. The question is, how easily? Normal people usually can't compile a userland from scratch on installation. Would providing a helper script to do so in the installer be legal? Would providing patches that users can apply to an ISO before installation be legal? Maybe. It does depend on how far the government goes to close all loopholes, and I think it's pretty unlikely that it will really go so far as to make age verification mandatory on linux; controlling true decentralised open source code is extremely difficult.

>>43109415
The real danger IMO is not for laws affecting linux, but laws requiring attestation at the service level. Compared to patching all the loopholes like "distributing educational tools that can patch an ISO to disable verification is illegal", it would be much easier to simply start making laws that basically say
>online services must require a legally approved cryptographic age attestation
And then "approving" your attestation costs $500k in adminstrative fees. Microsoft, Apple, Google and Facebook get their shit approved, using ID verification to ensure the age is accurate. One of them, maybe Google, releases an open source "attest yourself with our keys" library that calls into Google servers to verify your ID and then runs as a daemon providing remote attestation on demand, so linux distros can just include it and be legally compliant. And anyone who doesn't run the google daemon or send their ID to them, is barred by all websites and network services that want to be legally compliant with US and EU laws. So everyone who doesn't comply is reduced to playing single-player games, visiting websites hosted in Russia/China/Iran, and chatting over i2p or some shit.

IMO this is a lot more likely than them ever actually bothering to regulate Linux and open-source OSes directly. If they just go after enough website hosters and force them all to verify the attestation, it will effectively mandate proprietary attestation for all users regardless of your OS.

>>43109415
>>43109432
this whole ID age verification is failing miserably because no one fucking knows how to implement it properly, including operating systems

>>43109505
They're figure it out eventually. They law only exists in like 3 places in the world right now and it's only been like a couple of weeks. Even Cali's deadline for implementing it isn't until 2027.
For example when the UK passed their child verification laws it took a couple of months until more and more websites either integrated actual ID checks, or blocked the UK. Or for an older example, when GDPR passed companies had months to update their data policies to comply and they all mostly did it last minute.
They also don't have to prosecute anyone if they don't want to, so it doesn't feel "unfair" at first but then they can easily ramp up enforcement when they feel like people have solutions figured out.

It's all a gradual process, there's a few laws now, in a year or two it will become widespread, within another year or so enforcement will ramp up. And within another 3-5 years, or maybe 10 years or whatever, they will start on stricted verification or attestation laws.

Think about how porn sites have required a "are you 18+?" checkbox for many many years now, and only recently they've started upgrading that to requiring serious verification. It doesn't happen overnight.

>>43109520
>For example when the UK passed their child verification laws it took a couple of months until more and more websites either integrated actual ID checks, or blocked the UK. Or for an older example, when GDPR passed companies had months to update their data policies to comply and they all mostly did it last minute.
The UK law is mostly companies regulating themselves because they're not interested in legal activism
4chan told Brits to fuck off and their entire master plan to regulate the Internet fucking failed

Whatever the hell is going on in Commiefornia is just going to drive more companies from Commiefornia

>>43109525
>The UK law is mostly companies regulating themselves because they're not interested in legal activism
Yes, that's how it works
>4chan told Brits to fuck off and their entire master plan to regulate the Internet fucking failed
For now, because they aren't affected yet.
My entire point is that this shit spreads, the UK was just the first major one to add this law and implement it.

>>43109531
>My entire point is that this shit spreads, the UK was just the first major one to add this law and implement it.
well yeah, it does spread (DSA in EU, eSafety in Australia), but the thing is that nonsensical legislatures aren't going to work under federal law of the US
IMO we're reaching the point where US IT companies would rather leave the European market than try to comply with their draconian laws
(and laws in US states about age verification get struck down so lol)

>>43109415
>>43109432
>>43109505
Blocking Redhat with age verification would be supremely retarded and (provided this bullshit is forced worldwide) add more latency to many servers because little Timmy might find himself trapped in a data Center, with no knowledge of the terminal/remote connect, somehow accessing “bad content”. What a shit show.

>>43109540
Reminder that this was never about the children. It's about control.

>>43105474
then maybe coreboot should stop being a meme that only works on 20yo thinkpads

>>43109569
>only works on 20yo thinkpads
wrong
coreboot does work on 64-bit chinkpads
(and chromebooks lol)

>>43109578
>>43109569
NTA but am a little curious what it takes to build core boot for a board. I mean a bunch of the Linux laptop vendors, nitrokey and dasharo exist and all have core boot options.
Surely it's not that hard, right? Just gotta extra blobs and glue them together with some script coreboot may have?
That sounds like a weekend project to have fun with a CHR programmer

>>43109735
most of bootloader stuff is low-level witchcraft that only 3 individuals on the planet can reverse engineer

>>43109735
I want to come inside Rainbow Dasharo.

>>43109735
>project to have fun with
Isn't there inherent risk of bricking everything? I can imagine how that would decrease the fun levels

>>43109765
It helps to desolder the BIOS chip and solder on some DIP socket so you can just take it out and re-flash it whenever something goes wrong. Obviously, that's also something not everybody is able to do.

File: 20231124_162720.jpg (94 KB, 699x932)

94 KB JPG

>>43109569
Aside from modern ThinkPads being supported (don't check how old T480 is) I saw someone porting it to Zen 4 FW16 on top of openSIL despite the latter being supposed to launch with Zen 6, and the Dashfags were porting it too to some consumer Zen 5 motherboard. Great news, even if they'll end up not fully functional.
https://www.phoronix.com/news/Framework-16-Coreboot-openSIL
https://www.phoronix.com/news/3mdeb-Ryzen-MSI-Port-Progress

>page 9
I’m on Linux Mint 6.6.2, starting steam off of the terminal works fine, but the desktop/applet bar start just crashes me back to Lock Screen with a casper md5 checksum error.
I think I either gotta fix the desktop file, disable Casper md5 with sudo, or reinstall steam if I remember correctly? Just curious if any of the other anons ran into this, steam works fine with l4d2 (other then minor niggles related to overlapping keybinds and display size issues with the gestures hud)

>>43111197
>Linux Mint 6.6.2
You mean Cinnamon 6.6.2, I take it?

>>43096246
The original BSD license was also enforceable once upon a time. It caused legal troubles for entities who didn't print the dozens of variations of the advertising clause.
I could swear one organisation had to apologise and reprint their advertising materials with the long list of acknowledgements.

>>43111221
Yes, sorry about that.
I’ll have to debug it when I get home.
Sorry if tech support-esque posts aren’t appreciated here, better then a stale bump I guess.

>>43111323
>Sorry if tech support-esque posts aren’t appreciated here
nah it's fine
/fglt/ is /sqt/2 anyway

>page 10
thanks for the retarded simps bumping the ((cosplay)) thread

>only today realized I can just continue listening to YouTube music on my phone while browsing by using split screen
I'm a brainlet

>>43112215
Or you could use a proper browser which continues to play even after you switch to a different tab.

>>43112353
I'm using the YouTube app. I'm sure there's other solutions but I can't be arsed to put in the effort because I hate smartphones.

>>43108323
Escape

>>43112215
>>43112359
newpipe

>>43112215
>>43112359
>>43112966
YouTube ReVanced, plebs

>>43113593
>plebs
>he says, using the closed and proprietary youtube app with some hacky patches on top of it
newpipe

>>43111197
>>43111221
>>43111324
fixed it by disabling Casper md5, I know windows has shortcuts, but is there any way to throw games into my secondary drive and not have them shit their pants or complain about missing dependencies? Or do I have to move the dependencies over to the drive too?

>>43113605
games from steam should use Valve's SteamRuntime instead of your system's libraries, not sure why it's failing on your machine

>>43113599
you're right anon
i don't like how newpipe handles subscriptions, but that's just something that's prevalent in all FOSS YT alternatives so I just always settle on newpipe

>>43112966
>>43113593
What part of "I can't be arsed to put in the effort because I hate smartphones" don't you guys get? I literally just use the stupid thing to browse /mlp/ and listen to music in bed, and some very irregular "legit" activity that forces me to use it, such as banking. I even do TOTPs via KeePassXC instead of the stupid phone.

>>43113975
>I even do TOTPs via KeePassXC instead of the stupid phone.
same, but I do have backup TOTP on my phone just in case

not sure about (You) but I usually download my music and listen to it locally

File: RainbowDash_Fluttershy_an(...).png (3.85 MB, 1721x1721)

3.85 MB PNG

>>43113975
I suppose anons wanted to offer you a bit more comfort with just a bit of effort invested. They probably consider it a worthy tradeoff longterm, and I'd agree with them.

>>43113981
>not sure about (You) but I usually download my music and listen to it locally
Yeah, I should perhaps do this but it's laziness, really. And a throwback from when there hardly was any free storage space available on my now 8-year old phone to store audio files on so I just settled for listening via the app. Also, I usually listen to old (retro) video game music and those require special plugins that's just more >work to set up when Youtube is a button press away.

>>43113989
I'm sorry, I shouldn't have been as abrasive as I was in that post, I know you're actually trying to be helpful. Apologies.

>>43113995
>my now 8-year old phone
The previous one I owned, in case that wasn't clear.

>>43113995
>Also, I usually listen to old (retro) video game music and those require special plugins
?
just download ost dump.mp3 lol

>>43114033
Exporting a several kB music file to several MB MP3 feels too much like a waste. Besides, that way I can't turn on looping easily.

>>43113975
Why did you download the official dedicated app for youtube if you hate smartphones you triple vantablack nigger

>>43113612
GMOD complains about engine runtime missing if I install it on my secondary drive, I know I’ve heard syslinks mentioned, how hard are those to set up if I just path over all the dependencies to my secondary drive? Or do I have to set up global ENV variables/paths?

>>43114074
Because it came preinstalled, retard?

>>43114085
You sure are using your smartphone like an extreme normie for someone who claims to hate it

>>43114077
symlinks are not difficult but now I wonder why GMod even bitches about dependencies if everything should be in ~/.steam.
Perhaps it looks for relative paths for some stuff? If you can please post your crash logs here

File: 3183309.png (195 KB, 822x771)

195 KB PNG

i managed to merge my mc server and file server into a single system, am i a real haxx0r now?
(i was just lazy before)

>>43114144
Whatever you say, dumbfuck. I think anyone who rices the dumb thing is way more involved than someone who just uses it to scroll /mlp/ in bed. This will be my last response to you.

>>43115036
I installed Lineage on my because I hate malware from stock ROMs
nta

>>43115276
I installed CyanogenMod on a very old Samsung one I got as a passdown from my mother before I got the previous one (I think it was a Galaxy S-II or something) but I can't install a mod on my current one because I'm a cheapskate (and don't want to pay too much for a phone I hardly use anyway) and got a Motorola that hardly has any support from the modding community. If it was as easy as the Samsung I probably would've taken the time to throw out the stock ROM, but the Motorola doesn't have too much bloatware to begin with (which is another reason I chose it) so it's not that bad.

>>43115712
best phones to ROM are Google Pixels
older models from the A series are pretty cheap, especially if you're in the US

Bump

File: 1772970604136587.jpg (281 KB, 2447x1214)

281 KB JPG

Just found out I could replace searxng with omnisearch, that thing's real fast I also made a compose/Dockerfile for it as the main dev doesn't have that yet: https://files.catbox.moe/eso3jw.zip

Picrel I riced mine

>>43116111
4get is better IMO

File: 1762304624347447.png (654 KB, 1280x720)

654 KB PNG

>>43116123
Dunno anything about it.
How good is it? It's >PHP so already eeeh? But what's the appeal, anon?

>>43116129
>But what's the appeal, anon?
autism
it's main instance (4get.ca) uses 'tism for captchas
also scraps brave & yandex pretty consistently (unlike searxng that always shits its digital pants)

>>43116137
Yeah you're right I feel it's pretty claustrophobic as a UI and stuff but it's pretty based too. I could make a pinkie css theme easily so it's good in my book.

Do someone have a solution for the new deviantart paywalling of any kind of downloads?

>>43116102

>>43116878
Using an account isn't enough?

>>43117851
Not anymore. Downloads are behind paywall after 10 downloads per week per account.

>>43117867
What does a download have over a regular right click->save as, though? Higher resolution? I didn't think anyone was still even using Deviantart.

>>43117873
If the artist enables it you can download the full resolution file. Or in case of its a 3d model or a zip file then that.
Nobody using deviantart? Are you insane or something? About a third of the pony stuff gets posted there first. And 95% of what's get posted there are not posted to other sites by the artists themselves.

>>43117899
I thought just about anybody notable uses Xitter nowadays. I haven't used Deviantart myself in over a decade.

sup
I've been using GNU/Linux for years at this point, but never bothered with tinkering my system for better "gaming performance". The only thing I do is replacing regular Proton with -GE
should I bother with gamescope and other crap? I'm on Debian Trixie so not sure if I'm even able to properly use bleeding edge gayming snake oil

>>43118426
What are you trying to achieve exactly?

>>43118485
more frames
less input lag

overall better experience idk

File: 32326.gif (826 KB, 605x478)

826 KB GIF

>>43118426
I don't feel the need to do so myself, but it's possible I have a desktop overkill enough to not care 7950X3D 7900XTX pony wallpaper. I've been on linux-zen kernels on Arch for a few months out of curiosity, but frankly I don't recall any noticeable changes in daily/games performance or latency on either of my machines.

>>43118502
>spoiler
wow
my system is AM4 almost pushed to its limits but yours is truly overkill for this lol
>gif
I want to do pushups with Rainbow Dash

File: 1762318148824319.png (604 KB, 1121x1490)

604 KB PNG

tech

I wish I wasn't such a techlet

File: 6845799__safe_artist-colo(...).png (3.8 MB, 1961x1679)

3.8 MB PNG

>>43120263
>pick a piece of tech you already use and find interesting
>find an article on Wikipedia about the piece of tech
>channel your inner autism to spend hours reading linked articles, even if you don't understand them
>notice a mental model of the piece of tech forming in your head
>repeat until you feel pretty well informed about the topic, or if suddenly you're interested in another
Just start exploring, anon. You can only get better, and there's nobody to judge you if you understand things a bit slower than others. You can imagine bookhorse encouraging (You) to simply read when you have time.

>>43120322
Better IMO if you have something in particular you're trying to learn/do. Recent example:
>be me
>bought a bunch of 6400 MT/s DDR5
>motherboard will only run it at 4800 MT/s no matter how high I set the speed in the BIOS
>read about overclocking on server motherboards and find out it's basically not possible
>you can underclock if you want, but otherwise it sticks to what the RAM itself claims to support
>read about how RAM reports its speed to the motherboard using JEDEC and XMP/EXPO profiles
>the RAM was listed as 6400 MT/s at 1.4v, which usually means that's the XMP/EXPO (overclock) profile, whereas its JEDEC profile will be something more conservative like 4800 MT/s at 1.1v
>server motherboards don't support XMP/EXPO, only JEDEC, which is why it's running slower
>read about the SPD chip that stores these profiles, and how to reprogram it (at risk of bricking the RAM)
>find a DDR5 SPD breakout board that lets you reprogram it with an arduino (to unbrick it if needed)
>download the actual JEDEC specs to see what I could reprogram it to do
>JEDEC profile only supports 1.1v (there are no other values you can write to that field)
>you can override the speed/timings though
>probably can't hit 6400 MT/s at 1.1v, but could try 5200 or 5600 and see if it works
I started with a vague problem (RAM doesn't run as fast as I wanted) and now I have a potential solution (buy the breakout board and adjust the speed in the SPD chip's JEDEC profile) and learned a whole bunch about how RAM works in the process

>>43120322
Well, I'm actually somewhat informed on a lot of things, the problem is I always seem to be behind on everything. It also doesn't help that the things I want to do (provide a service to others) requires an incredibly involved threat model in $current_year. Wish internet was still the laid back techbro stuff it was like in the early 2000s, now it's all people with agendas, griefers, trolls and other losers just making the entire thing not fun.

>>43120368
>It also doesn't help that the things I want to do (provide a service to others) requires an incredibly involved threat model in $current_year
Ah yeah, world is a fuck for sure. I'm in a medium size discord server that keeps talking about moving off due to discord's various bullshit. I'd love to host something for them, but allowing image uploads onto my own hardware is pretty scary. I don't think normal people can even get an account for reporting to NCMEC, and if you do get one I'm not sure if it provides any actual immunity (vs. "we'll refrain from prosecuting, as long as you stay on our good side")

>>43120394
Yeah, and it seems just about every white hat is a black hat nowadays intent on doxxing you and exposing to the world that you jerk it to pony porn with your name and address in full print just because some autistic tranny didn't like that you banned barbies from your server or some stupid shit like that. Back in the day people did also troll others, me included (in trolling people), but everyone at least had the decency to keep real life stuff out of it, but that seems to have gone out the window when everybody started getting politically engaged (and thus believing they are "fighting" some sort of perceived evil when in reality they're just creating an ever more oppressive atmosphere that is the ideal breeding ground for some Orwellian police state).

I just want to share ponies with other like-minded people, not worry about some shittard with an axe to grind submitting pizza to my server to get me vanned. Bleh.

>>43120394
>reporting to NCMEC
has anyone ever been prosecuted for not reporting to NCMEC anyway? I'm pretty sure Null only implemented that nonsense in 2025 lol

>>43120497
All I know is the lain.la guy complained that our Big Tech friends get literally millions of reports every year and do nothing about it and that's a-okay but when it's a small independent server it's suddenly "NO! YOU MUST RESPOND WITHIN 2 HOURS OR YOU'RE COMPLICIT!!!"

File: Spoiler Image (177 KB, 607x440)

177 KB PNG

>>43120503
he also argued about Trump being le bad as more important than shitty legislatures, I feel like he was just bullshiting before shutting down his server
also RapeApe publicly stated that NCMEC takes 30 days to respond to 4chan reports lol

>>43120522
What do they even respond with? "Thank you for your cooperation, good citizen. Your report has been looked at by our team of experts on child safety and summarily discarded."?

>>43120526
probably, as host of pedoproxy has yet to be arrested (thankfully the proxy is cucked beyond belief by 4chan devs, but the fact that cops don't do ANYTHING is really fucking retarded)

File: Spoiler Image (409 KB, 492x600)

409 KB GIF

>>43120522
>takes 30 days
>pic clearly says ninety days

File: 10898.gif (141 KB, 582x400)

141 KB GIF

>invalid ssl cert on nhnb
>no alt site thread to complain about it in
this is the next best place so sue me

>>43120561
>>invalid ssl cert on nhnb
who the fuck goes to nhnb lol

>>43120564
I do my friend

>>43120561
There's /pooner/

>>43108323
If they can force the OSs to change their code for this, they can force them to change their code for anything. Whether it be content ID at the OS level to ensure you're not playing any unpaid for content or mandating an approved list of hosts that you are allowed to connect to. Sounds crazy, but if you look at some of the stuff they've been proposing for 3d printers you realize this type of stuff is exactly in their ballpark. All of this legislation should be illegal because computer code is legally protected speech and these laws are mandating government compelled speech. It's a clear violation of the 1st amendment.

This also radically changes the paradigm on arching stuff. I think people for a long time have archived stuff with the assumption that even if the internet goes to shit they'll still have their local copy of things they value. But they're local copy won't help them much if their OS refuses to play or open it. People will now need to ensure they've archived OSs and enough software to get up and going all locally. And as time goes on hardware could become an issue too if something comes along to block the installation of older OSs.

While the actual California law largely doesn't do much. Doesn't verify age and doesn't require applications to actually do anything with the API. The terrifying thing to me is the state being able to mandate features in code, because with that there's no limit to what they can require.

>>43120834
>because computer code is legally protected speech and these laws are mandating government compelled speech. It's a clear violation of the 1st amendment.
I remember some legal bullshit and Scotus found code to not always be speech because of its "use" or some shit
1A might be more applicable to vidya basically

>>43120844 (cont.)
also wonder how the hell Cali is going to regulate Sony's annual PS3 updates with BD keys. Are they going to just outlaw them lol?

>>43120844
There's been multiple cases where the courts have ruled code as legally protected speech. The main one that comes to my mind is the guy who developed PGP. The federal government was going after him because his software used encryption keys longer than what the law allowed, thus they declared his software a weapon and said he was in violation of export laws. So he published his code as a book to prove a point that published code is no different than any other type of published text. In the court case that followed, the courts sided with the PGP guy and said code was legally protected speech. There's been other cases but this is the main one I think of.

>>43120848
What about on servers where you might have multiple people using the same account? Or creating accounts to be exclusively used by other pieces of software?

>>43120877
>What about on servers where you might have multiple people using the same account?
I'm pretty sure regulators don't know how to "fix" this lol

>>43120873
I remember SCOTUS doing some weird with Java APIs being non-speech "useful knowledge" that couldn't be copyrighted
really weird stuff really

hope freedom wins in the end without another 1776, because current situation is too retarded to be passable by the courts

>>43120899
>doing some weird
weird stuff
>really weird stuff really
sorry for being retarded here

>>43120899
>Java APIs being non-speech "useful knowledge" that couldn't be copyrighted
I think that'd be more in the realm of interfacing between software and not the code itself. Like say some website has an undocumented API, it's whether or not you can use that API to interface with the site using your own code. Maybe. I'm just guessing. But that type of situation would kind of make sense as "useful knowledge".

>>43120503
This was similar to the experience the smutty.horse admin had

>>43120988
that guy talked to the police like a retard

>>43120492
Well you can always encrypt everything locally.
Spin up your own matrix server or something and have its data be saved to an encrypted luks container. Or maybe simpleX offers the possibility of encrypting stuff directly without luks? Or better yet just use S3 with minio locally and set your bucket to be encrypted.
That way it's literally impossible for anyone looking at what is stored on the server to know they'd have to join your niche online clique and if they do just have some vague rule about "you must notify the admin about le bad stuff" or something.

>>43122044
I understood the first part, but what does...
>Or better yet just use S3 with minio locally and set your bucket to be encrypted.
...mean? I'm assuming this is remote hosting stuff, isn't it? I have zero experience with that kind of stuff. Wouldn't know how to start getting experience in it without taking out my wallet either.

>>43122112
>I'm assuming this is remote hosting stuff, isn't it?
Amazon S3, yeah

>>43122112
Not really no. S3 is just a way to store files..you can run your own S3 instance using minio locally. So basically you have a file server talking to your app.
It's a bit convoluted but it's the only thing I know which will do file based encryption instead of unlocking a container at runtime and locking it at rest.

>>43122224
fuck

>>43117867
And what are accounts locked behind?

>>43121006
I don't remember that at all, I remember he was in a back and forth with amazon tech support devs when they shut down his site
Tech support is not the police and if you just say nothing and go "I want a lawyer" or whatever they'll just say fuck off we'll just terminate your account forever bye

>>43122222
>It's a bit convoluted but it's the only thing I know which will do file based encryption
fscrypt can do it

>>43122953
I think he said in /fast/ that he was interrogated by the the glowies

>>43122958
Can it? The way I understood it is that it made a small container like cryptomator that is unlocked.when you need to use it?

>>43122998
>The way I understood it is that it made a small container like cryptomator
What are you talking about, fscrypt? That's the module that provides per-file encryption with filesystems that support it, mostly ext4. Or are you talking about something else

>>43123021
Yeah, fscrypt, per the arch wiki it seems to mount an encrypted dir as an overlay.

So basically
fscryt encrypt dir
Mount encrypted-dir decrypted-dir
And from there you use decrypted-dir until you're done and that exposes clear files.

What I was saying is that in minio your files will look like encrypted-dir/A_BUNCH_OF_NONSENSE
Where each file here is impossible to read and write to without going through minio.

That's the kinda encryption I meant when I said "not like a container"

>>43123129
I'm reading the arch wiki and it just says you do "fscrypt unlock dir", no mounting. At least on ext4.

>Where each file here is impossible to read and write to without going through minio.
If that's what you want, then yeah a userspace tool is the way to go, because a filesystem level layer is always going to involve unlocking the file and allowing any other process to be able to read it (that's what a filesystem is for) and then relocking it later. But this distinction has nothing to do with containers.
(For that matter overlay mounts have little to do with containers either but I guess I kinda see what you meant.)

>>43122941
Probably the usual IP + mail combo, maybe browser fingerprint.

>>43123153
Oh yeah I didn't mean a container like a docker or podman one. I meant an overlay / volume that allows you to transit between encrypted and decrypted data, kek.
To me encryption at rest is nice but I feel what people want when they say "encrypted data" is stuff that's impossible to even look at if you don't have a password ready.

10

>>43123591
Yeah makes sense.
Honestly I'm now wondering too why there doesn't seem to be a single filesystem (that I know of) that would allow a specific process to access and decrypt the data, without making it accessible to any other reader.

>>43124779
I guess because it makes any kind of data verification, check summing or anything like that impossible without agreeing on what the key is supposed to be?

>>43124781
Well the key would probably be the same for everyone. And usually the filesystem is not the one holding the key so ext4 with fscrypt itself already can't read the file/directory contents unless the user unlocks them. But that's double-irrelevant because very few filesystems do checksumming and ext4 doesn't, and also because you can checksum encrypted data perfectly fine and detect corruption if it changes, you don't need to know what the file "means" for that.

My best guess is simply because Linux isn't really built around isolating processes with similar privileges from each other. If two processes have permissions to access a file, Linux in general assumes they should be allowed to do so. And if you want to isolate them, have some super secret file that only some process(es) can read, you have to play around with groups and permissions, or sandboxes like namespaces or whatnot (the kind of stuff containers are built out of. or just use a container even).
And if programs are built to handle secret data they can just roll their own encryption.

>>43124786
Yeah true probably this.
Also a lack of care from anyone I guess.
LUKS is likely good enough for 99.99% of people and businesses don't care about security anyway. Plus it's trivial to store encrypted data as BLOBs instead of asking the FS directly.

>>43124789
>Plus it's trivial to store encrypted data as BLOBs instead of asking the FS directly.
Basically this. If you want to make it transparent then you have a ton of questions about key management and permission systems, which the filesystems and kernel probably don't want to bother with when userspace utilities (like minio, apparently) can do just fine and likely even better, due to being userspace and tailored to some specific usecase rather than having to support every user ever by being in everyone's kernel.
Whereas if you wanted to add a new API like fencryptedopen(path, mode, key) then every program would need to explicitly support it and if they do that they can just include a library and do the decryption themselves instead of building it into the filesystem.

>>43124792
Speaking of minio.
PyDio also does that. And it's basically the file part of nextcloud. Kinda neat to store your pony folder away from prying eyes.

What do you guys think of tiny.ai ? I don't see linux support.

>>43125796
No idea. If it's an LLM, use silly tavern, if it's something else comfy UI mostly works.

>>43125979
Anon open the site...

>>43126093
I ain't clicking that shit, nigga

>>43126093
Why

>>43125796
I saw this review https://bay41.com/posts/tiiny-ai-pocket-lab-review/ on the orange website and skimmed through it just now (the blogger used AI to write it so it has a lot of fluff/padding). Memory bandwidth is only 100 GB/s which is not that great. If RAM prices weren't gigafucked right now, you'd be far better off spending the same amount of money on RAM + GPU upgrades for your existing computer. Even with the RAM prices you might still be better off, actually.

page 10 reeeee. Bump

10 bump

Has anypony done a check on the code in this project? >>43107105
It seems pretty cool, but I'm too retarded to check the source code for malware.

>>43100663
twily sick :(

>>43126415
>If RAM prices weren't gigafucked right now
The thing is, they are gigafucked.
This is why this box with 32+48gb ram seems like a good deal.

File: 24832.jpg (233 KB, 1526x1240)

233 KB JPG

>>43128295
Probably searching his folder for non overposted images

How can 4chan tell I'm using Incognito browsing mode? No site should ever be able to know about this in any way whatsoever, is this just some quirk of Chrome (it happens when I'm using my phone)?

>>43129389
>How can 4chan tell I'm using Incognito browsing mode?
4chan-JS / extension.js has this in its code:
>if (window.isIncognito) {
>>let el = $.id('qrFile');
>>if (el && el.value && !QR.painterData) {
>>>QR.showPostError('Uploading files in incognito mode is not allowed.'
>>>+ '<br>The File field has been cleared.');
>>>QR.resetFile();
>>>return false;}}
either disable native extension or use 4chan-x

>>43095731
>Would it be a good OS for my X220 laptop?
Yes. I run it on an Intel i5-4570 and you wouldn't believe how quick it is on ancient hardware. Now that a mad genius has ported the Nvidia Turing+ GPU drivers, I'm looking forward to building a newer box just for it. It's my favorite OS by far.

>>43129755
>Now that a mad genius has ported the Nvidia Turing+ GPU drivers
desu it's mostly a W of nVidia opening some of their code, rather than autists being really good at hardware acceleration
would be better if they targeted iGPUs IMO

>>43129758
>it's mostly a W of nVidia opening some of their code, rather than autists being really good at hardware acceleration
I don't mean to discredit Nvidia. I'm really pleased they did that in the first place. But someone had to go through the trouble of getting them to play nicely with Haiku's odd architecture.
>would be better if they targeted iGPUs IMO
Maybe. I prefer to use desktop hardware.

>>43129764
>>would be better if they targeted iGPUs IMO
>Maybe. I prefer to use desktop hardware.
don't know about you, but I really want to use Haiku on SBCs like RPi

>>43129773
iGPUs are a form factor, to support the raspberry pi you'd need drivers for whatever integrated GPU it has (some kind of ARM-land bullshit probably).

>>43129791
iirc RPi 4 has some weird bootloading process that requires GPU
have no idea how the fuck Brits designed their shit this way

>>43129793
Ebin, I hadn't heard of that but I can believe it

>>43129793
>RPi 4
nvm apparently this was a thing since the first RPi
what were they thinking?

tfw been archiving all my bookmarks from the past decade.
I have to make gallery-dl use a 3 second delay between grabbing pics on twitter or else my IP gets banned.
The script has been running for 4 months and it's only 1/3 finished.
But at least now I have some lost media because good artists delete their accounts so often.

>>43129844
Also my archive already takes up 6TB. I had to buy a new hard drive and I'm not even sure if the new one is big enough for everything.

>>43120844
>>43120848
I think they will selectively enforce this law. A dozen walmart cashier computers that haven't been updated in 20 years and don't have the mandatory age verification? No problem, just a $500 fine. Police randomly tackle a guy with a backpack, plant 1 ounce of weed on him then illegally search his laptop and find an outdated version of debian installed without the age check? That's gonna be 20 years of jail minimum, no parole.

>>43129853
the law tries to regulate "OS providers", not regular users
in fact that "Ageless Linux" project advertises itself as "breaking the law" by making anyone using it "an os provider"

>>43129846
6TB of just pics? That's insane. That's millions of pics. Are a lot of them videos/animations or are you just following tens of thousands of prolific artists?

>>43129876
It includes 2TB of youtube vids, but yes I have thousands of artists bookmarked. The unfortunate thing about social media is that a lot of these accounts spam the utter shit out of reaction gifs and irrelevant 50 megapixel photos of everything they eat which inflates the archive size. I plan to trim it down after everything is done downloading, though that may be a monumental task. And this is with my config skipping retweets and replies, so I'm certainly missing things like fan art and commissions and bonus artwork.

>>43129882
Oof.
Yeah twitter sucks ass cheeks as an art website, and I cannot fucking comprehend why artists INSIST on using it as their primary medium and not only that but even their only fucking medium.

>>43129885
>why artists INSIST on using it as their primary medium
IIRC it's the biggest social media platform so if they want to maximize the visibility of their art they flock to it, despite twitter not being designed as an art site.
Besides, there really aren't that many options for hosting art. Deviantart is an AI only site now, pixiv is basically only for japs, boorus are for coomers, FA for hardcore furfags, tumblr is dead, and self hosting is both expensive and nobody's gonna visit your site anyway.

>>43129709
Thanks for the answer anon. Really strange that a browser would expose such a function to the website in the first place. I wonder how this "feature" is supposed to help the user.

>>43129894
>help the user
:^)
Google dictates web standards.

>>43129885
Because legacy artists only care about their massive egos so maximum visibility is their only metric. They were never making art for art's sake.

>>43129890
>>43129900
>visibility
Yeah that's probably the answer. The mindset of "post a picture to get some likes/retweets and maybe patreon subscribers, then the next day work on more 'content' for more engagement" rather than "post a picture as another entry in my portfolio and artistic legacy".

>options for hosting art
Boorus are an excellent format for this. I only know of two communities using it, which is weebs and ponyfags (and I think furries with e6?), and the former almost exclusively for cooming, so I can understand the stigma. But by that same logic twitter is for political ragebaiting only. I know ponyfags host 99% of their art on boorus, a majority of which is non-coomer; it's a purely social problem, if artists were willing to engage it would have been trivial for someone to set up a "general art booru".
It's not like twitter artists are not filled with a massive proportions of coomers either.

But oh well, I guess that's the world we live in.

>>43129928
>ponyfags
Wait this is /pts/. I thought I was on /g/ lmao.

File: 2026-03-25_14-39-43.png (32 KB, 427x297)

32 KB PNG

>>43129709
>>43129894
>window.isIncognito
That's not a standard thing btw. If that's actually the code in the 4chan JS (I'm too lazy to check), then this property must be getting set by some other spyware fingerprinting dependency, probably based on analysing cookies or something.
Actually I just tried on a browser without 4chanx or anything (not even an adblocker) and I doesn't seem to exist either.

>>43129894
>I wonder how this "feature" is supposed to help the user.
technically it can be used by sites to automatically de-select "keep signed in" among other things, but it's mostly just Google being Google
>>43129939
topkek
>>43129943
>That's not a standard thing btw. If that's actually the code in the 4chan JS (I'm too lazy to check), then this property must be getting set by some other spyware fingerprinting dependency, probably based on analysing cookies or something.
I'm reading core.js and it literally just cites https://github.com/Joe12387/detectIncognito

>>43129949 (Me)
for the record core.js is their "base" JS code that should be enabled even when inline extension is disabled
So both standard post form and 4chan-JS's Quick Reply form have the check present

File: 1664071914288202.jpg (11 KB, 188x209)

11 KB JPG

>>43129949
>can be used by sites to automatically de-select "keep signed in"
In what way would that be useful? The sign-in cookies are gone the second I close browser. Sites can't read cookies of other sites can they?

>>43129949
>detectIncognito
Cool, there's the answer then.
I wonder why I'm not seeing it on a 4chan tab though. Maybe ungoogled-chromium breaks it or something (though I'd be a bit surprised since the patches are nothing revolutionary privacy-wise, it's just degoogling)

File: pone.social.png (49 KB, 805x456)

49 KB PNG

>>43129959
>In what way would that be useful?
pic rel, I often have dozens on login sessions "hanging" because I clean my cookies automatically while also not bothering with de-selecting "keep signed in"
>The sign-in cookies are gone the second I close browser
what's your browser? I'm pretty sure only "private" browsers like Librewolf clean cookies on close (by default at least)

>>43129964
>on
of
>>43129960
4chan-js is a mess really, wouldn't be surprised if something as simple as degoogling chromium broke its detection script

>>43129964
>>The sign-in cookies are gone the second I close browser
I meant in Incognito mode
>pic rel,
I see, that makes sense

>>43129949
Also
>it's mostly just Google being Google
You literally linked the javascript doing it, it's not something Google added to their browser. I will be the last person to defend Google's tyranny over the web, but in this case it is factually not Google's fault.

>>43129967
>wouldn't be surprised if something as simple as degoogling chromium broke its detection script
They are using a dependency so if it's broken it's not 4chan-js's fault. Of course it's still entirely possible the dependency still breaks on ungoogled-chromium.
Anyone with stock chrome can check if "window.isIncognito" is defined in their console? Because now I'm curious.

File: 1768129826370322.png (8 KB, 1104x1083)

8 KB PNG

>>43129972
>You literally linked the javascript doing it, it's not something Google added to their browser. I will be the last person to defend Google's tyranny over the web, but in this case it is factually not Google's fault.
I wasn't aware of that stuff being a third party library when I started writing that post
and I didn't bother to rewrite it after checking core.js
pic rel
>They are using a dependency so if it's broken it's not 4chan-js's fault
nah it's 4chan's fault
that project's repo recommends devs to include the library statically to get around uBlock killing it and 4chan does so (github repo is just a commented link, lol)
I assume they never bothered the code they copied

File: 1765741783797859.gif (433 KB, 502x466)

433 KB GIF

>>43129979
>I assume they never bothered the code they copied
*they never bothered to update the code they copied

Should this even be reported as a bug? Dedicated shitposters clear their cookies anyway

>>43129986
>Should this even be reported as a bug?
Why would you ever report "the website is not tracking us as well as it could" as a bug

If you hate the proxypedos that's fair but incognito mode is not something that will bring down the proxy. Besides hiro has added a dozen even more invasive tracking scripts just for that, so we can only hope proxy dies painfully asap

File: lmao.png (410 KB, 864x623)

410 KB PNG

>>43129993
>Why would you ever report "the website is not tracking us as well as it could" as a bug
because them fixing it would definitely result in a fuck-up on their side, making the site broken for an hour or so?
>so we can only hope proxy dies painfully asap
yeah afaik they are so low on IPs their nigger host asks people to shitpost less (pic rel for /mlp/)

>>43130000
>because them fixing it would definitely result in a fuck-up on their side, making the site broken for an hour or so?
I'm confused here can you restate your meaning please
I read your post as "we should report this icognito-detection bug to 4chan so that they try to fix it and in the process likely bring down the site for an hour or so (good)" which surely can't be what you meant

>they are so low on IPs
Fucking nice, sometimes it feels like those shits have literally infinite IPs
Maybe could be a good worthwhile to intentionally use the proxy to kill it faster then lmao

>>43130009
>I read your post as "we should report this icognito-detection bug to 4chan so that they try to fix it and in the process likely bring down the site for an hour or so (good)" which surely can't be what you meant
nah that's exactly what I meant: I want to see desuwa break the site in a fun way
imagine 4chan being forced into textboard mode for a day or two because no one with native extension is able to post files
>spoiler
this wouldn't be possible because they now only offer service to those who give them money lol (and pedo passes do get revoked for active shitposting, lmao)

>>43130018
>(and pedo passes do get revoked for active shitposting, lmao)
That's interesting actually. I don't follow it closely, now that they're moderating their anti-moderation proxy (ebin) are they still allowing pedo and spam shit? I never looked into it in detail, so I actually don't know if it's called pedoproxy because it's actively enabling it or just because it was a reliable ban circumvention tool that pedos could take advantage of alongside all other shitposters.

>>43130031
>are they still allowing pedo and spam shit?
of course, that's the point of their entire operation
>so I actually don't know if it's called pedoproxy because it's actively enabling it or just because it was a reliable ban circumvention tool that pedos could take advantage of alongside all other shitposters.
nah they specifically enable pedoposting on 4chan. The whole shitshow started on /g/ with violations of >>>/global/rules/17

>>43130038
Well darn, that's disappointing
Also seems ironic that they would forbid shitposting, when pedoposting instantly gets your IP permabanned

>>43130031
>I actually don't know if it's called pedoproxy because it's actively enabling it
It's more than just enabling. They literally have their own local board called "/c/ - Children" where they share 3DPD pictures of actual kids, they're not exactly beating around the bush about it lol

>>43130386
Oh. Lmao.

>Page 9
I ran ReactOS on bare metal recently. Pretty cool despite the BSoDs and the development pace. It's nice to have an environment that replicates classic Windows without resorting to hackjobs like Chicago95, even if I just use it to play Minesweeper.

>>43130817
>I ran ReactOS on bare metal recently
HOW
the thing crashes in the fucking VMs

File: 1761906103132510.png (134 KB, 765x888)

134 KB PNG

I HATE GNOME
>I HATE GNOME
I HATE GNOME
>I HATE GNOME
I HATE GNOME
>I HATE GNOME
I HATE GNOME
>I HATE GNOME

>>43131573
So why do you keep using it?

>>43131589
I use Tails, which forces Gnome to keep itself "as generic as possible", which is good for security reasons
the fact that they go for Gnome is still a fucking problem

>>43131616
Tails is not meant as a daily usage distro, for your schizo cartel deals on public wifi you can ignore the desktop environment being not perfect for your preferences. Plus if you need keepass it literally says you can just install it.

>>43131396
I'm using a 13-year-old HP desktop I found on the street. Getting it to run on anything newer would be much harder...

>>43131681
>for your schizo cartel deals on public wifi you can ignore the desktop environment being not perfect for your preferences
Gnome just fucking sucks, switching to it because it's "le default" is fucking retarded. I wasn't even aware of Gnome had a password manager before they removed keepassxc
also you overestimate average Tails' user's activity
>Plus if you need keepass it literally says you can just install it.
at this point my Tails installation might glow from extras I got installed

>>43131959
The main point of tails is to run tor browser, installing extra software is extremely unlikely to cause issues.
>Gnome just fucking sucks
Yes but so does Tor and so does booting into a stateless system. It's all inconvenient in the name of privacy. Using gnome because it's "le default" unironically makes sense for Tails, in the chance that for some reason the software stack matters (and entire the DE probably has a lot more chances to leak or be detected than your password manager). I wish gnome wasn't the default but it is and therefore to have the biggest anonymity set it makes sense to use it.

Removing keepassxc is indeed retarded but again using something like Tails is already inconvenient enough that it feels like a non-issue in the grand scheme of things.

>>43131979
>installing extra software is extremely unlikely to cause issues.
more software means bigger attack surface

File: 1613671375754.gif (475 KB, 505x505)

475 KB GIF

I remember when I used to go to local library, boot up Tails and then push ASCII ponies into our schools unsecured git repository.
Good times
There should totally be ponified Tails logo

>>43132002
who should that pony be? A salt dealer?

File: BestPony.webm (2.43 MB, 1920x1080)

2.43 MB WEBM

>>43132019
Best Pony. Is it a pegasus? A unicorn? An earth pony? The Princesses? It could be anypony, there's no way to tell - and that would be relevant to this software's goals.

>>43132032
>it's even purple like Tails and Tor
yes please

im turning myself into a vibe coder, how do i stop?
regress and wear programming socks?

>>43132188
I think there's an interesting dynamic going on right now. The term "vibe coding" was invented when LLMs were notably worse than they were now, and only retards used them to build entire projects, so it became synonymous with barely working slop.
Nowadays LLMs are a lot more powerful, so you can unironically do a lot of work without writing the code yourself. It's spread even to experienced, senior professionals at respectable tech firms. Everyone is using coding agents to generate large chunks of code now, or "vibe coding" almost.

But there's still a difference between someone with no experience or knowledge prooompting the AI and just auto-accepting everything, and a real developer prooompting the AI, having the final word on the design, then reviewing the code and going back and forth with the AI until he's happy. In both cases you're not even writing code yourself, but in the former case it still ends up degenerating into a barely working mess (it takes longer than before, but it still fails eventually) whereas in the latter case it's possible to actually write decent code - well, decent enough for a corporate environment at the least. Both are technically "vibe coding" in the sense that the AI writes all the code, but the former is building up a house of cards until the slop comes crashing down, while the latter is no worse than your average wagie code monkey code and basically sustainable.

Too bad it's also fucking soul-sucking. AIs have turned programming into a full-time code review job and I hate it.

>>43132202
>AIs have turned programming into a full-time code review job and I hate it.
yeah using AI is either "autopilot that crashes in the long run" or "be a fucking nanny for a machine"

>>43132460
And the thing is being a nanny for a machine is still writer than writing everything out by hand, so it's not like I'm wasting time doing it. It's just far less enjoyable than it used to be.

I also have a problem that I always find big changes hard to start, so I would procrastinate a while at the beginning, then force myself to get going and then eventually get into the flow and wrap up the feature/work at a good pace. AI makes it much easier to get started since I just prooompt it and we "talk" through the design of a solution and it just goes ahead and does it, but then I'm basically skipping straight to the code review stage and it's boring as shit.

>>43132202
>AIs have turned programming into a full-time code review job and I hate it.
The way I use it is
>proompt
>let it run on its own (YOLO mode in an isolated VM) until it's done, usually an hour or two (my local setup is not super fast)
>skim the diff, try to decide in ~30s if it's good or if it's shit
>edit the good parts into shape and discard the rest
It ends up not being much like a normal code review, where you see something bad and have to write in English what you want changed and wait for somebody else to do it. It's more like when you get halfway through implementing something and you realize it sucks so you immediately go back and reimplement it a different way.

It's also been pretty good for motivation and productivity on my pony project. I'll usually give the AI something to work on overnight or while I'm at work, and then when I get up the next morning or get off work, there's always some in-progress thing for me to work on. No need to decide what to work on next because I already decided last night when I wrote the prompt. I've seen the advice before about always leaving something unfinished for the same reason, but I never liked doing that.

>>43132202
Kinda this.
But frankly with my usage I find using AI for coding is more of a disaster than anything.
The part I'm good at with coding is architecture and design, but fuck if i know synthax or the state of the art of doing things so I started proompting for designs to happen.
Man I can tell you those AIs are dumb as rocks so I basically use it like a glorified stack overflow question machine for that it's okay. I still wish it'd back up its shit with a link to the docs.

>>43131616
>I use Tails
Why?
It's peak cargo-cult cypherpunk bullshit security theater maintained by the globohomo and glowies behind Tor.
MacOS is unironically more secure.

>>43133720
NTA but having an amnesiac distro is pretty useful.
Would be cool if they had an immutable one with i2p though.

>>43133720
Whenever people say things like this they never back it up with facts... curious.

>>43133720
>MacOS is unironically more secure.
guaranteed replies, good job

>>43133724
>Would be cool if they had an immutable one with i2p though.
I'm pretty sure Tails had support i2p previously, but they dropped it because i2p's infrastructure is less "stable"
which is kinda true, I2P-java and i2pd bullshit is still a fucking problem

>>43133730
Go to any high level IT security conference, it's all dudes with macbooks. Being a paranoid schizo freetard is not good security.
Apple has a history of not giving your shit to the feds and they have good hardware security principles.

>>43133720
>>43133738
Completely different usecases. Tails is literally a throwaway Tor Browser distro, not something you run daily. Dudes at security conferences are using their macbooks for normal daily usage, which needs persistence and basically a normal convenient OS, not an immutable stateless Tor Browser wrapper.

Also, corporate and "high level" security is usually a lot less concerned with feds. The main argument against giving your data to feds is that a) they could misuse it and b) they could be breached, no matter how secure the government is. Giving your data to Apple as an entity carries exactly the same risks. Being a schizo freetard is the only way if you don't want to trust anybody at all, not the government, not Apple, not anything else.

>>43133732
i2pd works perfectly fine and is honestly stable. It's I2P-java which is kind of a bloated mess. Of course i2p has far fewer nodes than Tor.

>>43133738
Oh yeah that leak of people's iTunes (or whatever they call their shitty service) photos including private sex pictures was such an amazing example of Apple security, right?

>>43133738
>security conference
lolmao

>>43133760
>i2pd works perfectly fine and is honestly stable. It's I2P-java which is kind of a bloated mess
the main problem here is that instead of having a clear design idea i2p variants just copy each others' features whenever they appear might just be i2pd copying i2p-java but I'm not sure
this is really fucking retarded

>>43133767
Reminds me of Independence Day where the glowies tracked down the most amazing hacker whizz kid to hack the aliens and they had been watching him for some time now. If he's the best there is, why did he get caught in the first place?

>>43133768
I haven't really seen that. I2P-Java is the reference implementation so i2pd does "copy" it in the sense that it's a re-implementation, but also I2P-Java is full of a trillion features like built-in email, torrenting, chat, web server/hidden service hoster, etc. etc., of which i2pd has copied none and is just focusing on being an I2P router and nothing else.

>>43133772
I remember reading some >news >articles about new i2p releases and its often
>version 1.2.3 of I2P released, along with i2pd 4.5.6
and later finding out that fags coordinate feature parity using irc

were there ever security audits of i2p? At least with Tor we know where the weak points of architecture are

Unironically if escaping glowies is your main concern you're much better off just using a clearnet service that nobody expects to be used for your type of communication, like those terrorists that coordinated attacks over the fucking Playstation network and it took feds ages to catch up to it. Using Tor or I2P is just painting a huge red bullet on your back.

>>43133785
>like those terrorists that coordinated attacks over the fucking Playstation network and it took feds ages to catch up to it
It's more of a problem of PSN being so dogshit not even feds could monitor it desu

>>43133787
Sounds like a feature to me

>>43133789
keyword could
also the thing is less unstable as shit, PSN being down is more likely than it's being up
I also had a pleasure of NOT being able to login into my account on my consoles

This thread is like /g/ but with ponies.

>>43133802
wow thanks for explaining!

>>43133720
>root
>root
or my second favourite one
>root
>root

>>43133802
No wai!

Is there an application for an android phone which notifies if a given thread is about to fall off the board?

>>43134384
why would you need it?

>>43134384
I think kuroba can do it

>>43134384
Chance.
You can put an alarm for 9 or 10

>>43134440
It's extremely useful when you are outside or not near computer
>>43134384
I use https://tools.treebrary.org/thread-watcher/feed.xml?board=/mlp/&q=/pts/&chod=90
in RSS reader that gives me notification once thread hits page 10 (but you can set any position you want) but it's only useful for generals.

But if you have dedicated 4chan client then it's most likely a better choice

>>43134512
>It's extremely useful when you are outside or not near computer
I don't really need to keep track of generals because more dedicated anons bump my gens lol