>First 30 seconds of the record>Is this really from 1968?I'm not hugely well versed in 60s music, was it common for drums to sound like that?
No, it was a really groundbreaking track back then. Too bad the rest of the album doesn't hold up.
>>127724012There are some great songs on that album, they just don't sound like they're from the future.
>>127724012yeah I thought the same. they had the talent to do something great but its mostly just bubblegum pop. very competent but verging on easy listening.
>>127723967It's not really that good. Retards just like ot because it's slightly more challenging than the Beatles but not really. >>127724038It's about as "far out" as 4chan is willing to go lol. It's not really a memorable band in any context beyond that. Nobody back in the day was going "yeah le me listen to fucking uujjjjhhhh The Millenium" yk just no. Pearls before Swine. Absolute destroy this garbage. So do Bonnie and Wendy.
>>127726102Is Balaklava the most overlooked album of the 60s?
>>127724033The whole album actually does sound like it's from the future if you pay attention to the stereo mix. Everyone else was just starting to transition out of hard panning. >>127724038>implying bubblegum pop isn't greatalso this isn't easy listeninghttps://youtu.be/KFyv8pywXJg