You don't want to spend a dime on music, why would you? You don't care about it.
>>127725200
>>127725230Mmmmmm, slowed down pop samples.
>>127725200When you spend more than you make from it. - it's toys.
>>127725276All that stuff all together cost less than one crappy used motorcycle, gear, license, and insurance. There are people on this very board right now who spent more on Funko pops or retarded kpop merch.When you put it that way it makes you seem poor doesn't it? Or dumb enough to ride a motorcycle.
the point of getting equipment is to be able to manifest the sound and music you heard in your headbeyond that you shouldn't care that much about what you're using to make music, as long as it does what you wantyou don't want to be a gearfag, having all this power to make sounds but not knowing what sound you wanted to make
>>127725437>the point of getting equipment is to be able to manifest the sound and music you heard in your headNoodling is musically allowed and relevant or else jazz wouldn't exist.If what you said was true there would only be entry-level instruments, acoustical or electrical. It sounds like you don't really care much about any music hobby you might have, and that it's more performative and a way to get gay males to like you, or likeshares online.
>>127725451well to be frank, I've probably spent more money on equipment than you havethis is my conclusion after having owned $10k worth of real, physical equipment over the years
>>127725461Kek I knew you'd backpedal after my post manipulated you into feeling small and ashamed, uninformed.You'll fit in among westerners on our Internet sooner or later.
>>127725331ROI
>>127725472for example, you can explain to someone the value of having 5 different guitars; classical nylon, steel acoustic, archtop, single-coil electric vs humbucker electricthey don't sound the same and you can't make them sound the same, but you would only know that by understanding the tone you are trying to get out of a guitarthis is reason enough to go out and get thembut it's meaningless if you don't understand why they sound different, or why you are trying to get a different sound out of a guitarthis isn't even considering what kind of amp you're going to plug into, your pedal set up, how are you recording it
>>127725200your feeble logic can't save you. tech guy with no real personality.>music made with cheap tools is bad>therefore music with expensive tools is goodeven if the premise were true, which it isn't, let alone by causation, it's not even the right deduction to make.and spend all the money you want, your music will suck.
>>127725515we shit on VSTs because they are usually pretty shallow in terms of what they can do to your sound as opposed to what you can do with traditional real stuffof course most people would prefer to spend money and go get real equipment that affords you more control over the sound you are trying to achievebut if you happen to find some random VST that you can chuck on and hear exactly what you wanted, more power to you
>>127725478>all non-work activity must turn a profit!Let me guess, you're Jewish. Or a Hindoostani.
>>127725547>see picture of gear>Y-YOUR MUSIC MUST SUCKKek I knew most of this anti-gear faggotry was coming from third worlders.
>>127725602you will never post anything besides gear pictures
>>127725618Here? Absolutely not, this place is full of weird racially handicapped leftoid scumbags and glownigger faggits.Why would anybody post anything here? Nobody of any consequence cares what a bunch of USAID-paid shills thinks about their music.
>>127725645nice deflection. i know an object collector when i see one. that is not a picture taken by someone who actually uses their shit competently.
>>127725652How can you tell? It's all ergonimically set up just how I like it.Post your setup BTW. That'd be a feat - a jeet living in a tunneled-out gigantic cow turd posting a photo of their music studio lol.
>>127725592Of course owning physical gear is preferable than vsts. You wouldn't charge people to use your recording studio with only vsts. Or are you going to share your physical gear for free too? Imagine that. How kind. Maximum doubt.
>>127725682there's nothing you can do to make good music and you will cope about it for the rest of your life.
>>127725691>more coping thirdie postsYou sound very jealous about somebody owning a bit of musical equipment. Do you even dabble in music at all? It doesn't sound like it.I'd be jealous of people living in a better country who own actual technological artifacts too if I was you. It's OK you'll have plenty of fun with your pirated Ableton right? Just as much fun.
>>127725714>consumed product awardthat's better, stick to what you know.
>>127725739Everything there was purchased used, how is this consume product?You don't even know how to properly apply your pithy gay leftie catchphrases. You're like a monkey, just repeating what you see.
>i can tell you're not a homosexual or trans or a woman or brown>therefore your music will never be good according to me>also I notice you invested some money in your hobby or interest>good job consooomer
>>127725751>usedand much more so by the previous owners than by you. like the women in your life.
>>127725791Do you name and save your tunes before you've made them?That's a default tamplate tune.
New technologies offer solutions to the problems of old ones, but they bring new problems with them. If you really cared about music, you would be tackling these problems, whether through composition or engineering, or a mixture of both, in search of new technologies and/or new forms of music. I assume, from the way you present yourself, that this is what you are doing - taking these technologies that seem, at first glance, worn out and confronting them with unexplored fissures. A noble task, but useless if you are not a genius. The results will speak for themselves. But if you limit yourself to using them in the same way they were used back in the day, then you are no better than the little brother who thinks he is playing when his older brother hands him a disconnected controller.
>>127725813>If you really cared about music, you would be tackling these problemsThe problems were solved ages ago. But the solution can't be rented out and monetized.I'm not concerned with helping people use their computer to make music with the cloud. It's not interesting to me. And your premise sounds GPT-y, like a non-human made this post. If what you posit is true nobody could every make new music on an old instrument.No this won't do at all. I honestly hope you're an LLM because it'd be humiliating to post that drivel if you were a human.
You can't buy good earsA good ear can make anything work out
>>127725813Problem solving? Did you see the video where the online music journalist keeps getting his videos taken down and then spends umpteen thousand on lawyers?See where this is going?Won't be selling my own synth edit vsts -- i can tell you that!!!! Would like to see how you solve that one!Buy the gear.
>>127725959>Did you see the video where the online music journalist keeps getting his videos taken down and then spends umpteen thousand on lawyers?Which video?
>>127725200No, not in the slightest. I do, however, feel that posts like these are completely retarded however.t. guitarist.
4chan-gpt generated thread
>>127726368Nah this is a real thread. VST-sellers use gpt though.
