[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/mu/ - Music


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


>put all the best songs on the b-sides
why do bands do this
>>
>>127816466
Name one good song
>>
>>127816466
the “In Rainbows is the best Radiohead album” crowd I can understand, even if I disagree with them. but the “Disk 2 is better than In Rainbows” crowd? I really can’t comprehend them.
>>
bangers and mash is 1000x better than bodysnatchers and one of the best radiohead songs ever, and it makes me physically angry those songs werent swapped, seriously wtf were they thinking. down is the new up is really good but would sound out of place with the rest of the album. besides that disc 2 is pretty much totally forgettable.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.