[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/mu/ - Music


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


face it, the monkes were peak.
>>
>>127976274
The Monkees weren't shit, didn't even play instruments on the first few albums
>>
Zombies absolutely murk them for the 60s psych pop slot.
>>
>>127976274
they were better than the beatles
>>127976294
>b-but they didnt pla-
oh my God you still crying about that? who cares
>>
>>127976335
I do and many others do, maybe you should try caring it might make you less of a scrubby little loser ass turd.
>>
i just think Head is good
>>
>>127976274
The Wrecking Crew were peak you mean.
>>
>>127976403
They were nothing without Phil and you know it, the very concept of immortalizing session geeks is absurd
>>
>>127976294
> t. hates monkeying around, puts everybody down
>>
>>127976385
Head is better than any of the beatles movies
>>
File: Davy_jones.jpg (39 KB, 400x400)
39 KB
39 KB JPG
>>127976323
none of the zombies were as cute as Davy Jones ergo monkees win
>>
>[Q]: Do you think the Monkees have been unfairly bullied by critics over the last 50 years?
>[A]: I actually wrote a fairly (note I said fairly) positive article about them in 1967 in one of the first pieces of rock journalism I did. As I'm typing this I have their Greatest Hits on iTunes and it's not half-bad--decent singing, songwriting, etc. But no more than that. I mean, come on. There are literally hundreds of meatier pop acts out there.
>>
File: mike.jpg (5 KB, 274x184)
5 KB
5 KB JPG
>>127976437
>Tfw
>>
>>127976572
wasnt this man a cuck?
>>
>>127976335
>oh my God you still crying about that? who cares
lol this is the same dismissive argument people use for poop stars still using auto-tune today. I wonder how much farther music has to degrade until these types realize they caused it.
>lol so what they don't play instruments, lol so what they don't actually sing, lol so what the artist isn't even real, dooood stop being a hater! it's a vibe!
>>
>>127977043
tbf they did fight for the right to play their own instruments on they're third album onwards, and they did sing all of the songs on the records
>>
>>127977262
*their
fuck, no one will take me seriously after this
>>
>>127977043
no, its a valid point. The fact that they did or didnt play instruments doesnt change the music. you value music by factors outside the music itself, which is fine, but I dont do that
>>
File: monkeespaw.jpg (106 KB, 600x400)
106 KB
106 KB JPG
>>127976274
Their tv show is such a vibe. Redeemed!



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.