Why did he become a huge dick near the end of the Beatles?
>>127996302he wasnt a dick, he was productivethe dick was johns parasyte ching chong wife
>>127996324How so?
>>127996420she used hypotization techniques to give orders to john
>>127996302Always sucks being the best guy in a group project
>>127996302The band had three alphas and a Ringo. Something had to give.
Cause over the years, beginning after Yesterday had become one of their biggest hits ever, Paul's ego gets out of control. He starts calling the shots more and more to the point that, by the end of the band's life, he had caused a lot of ill will between himself and the rest of The Beatles. By 1965, when they're in the studio, he's already starting to tell everyone in the band how they should play their parts, at least on what he thinks are "his" songs. This is when George starts to really turn on him. John started disagreeing with him by this point too. He always hated that Paul was the most popular Beatle, and how, in his words, he started "Trying to take over the group." But then John meets Yoko, and once he does that all of his priorities, about being in The Beatles and about being an artist with Paul, are going to start changing. He even tries to quit in 1968. Earlier that year, Ringo left the band without word for a few weeks. Eventually George will quit and come back again in '69. The fighting just doesn't stop, and in the center of it all is Paul, who is directing them more and more towards his vision of what The Beatles should be, and pushing them all further away from him in the process. Ironically, he's always claimed that everything he did was done to try and keep the group together.In the end, the newspapers don't report on the breakup of The Beatles until Paul quits. He's still calling the shots. But if you ask him, it was all for the good of the group.
>>127996302The 3 others wanted to signed with a scammy manager (who ended up scamming them + The Rolling Stones) while Paul went independent and was troubleless
>>127996302he wasn't a huge dick, the rest of the band just didn't care anymore.John and George wanted to pursue solo careers, and Ringo wanted to do movies. Paul was the only member who wanted to keep the band together.Fun fact: After recording Abbey Road, the rest of the band left Paul and George Martin to assemble, arrange, and produce the album. Coincidentally, Abbey Road is their best album and the one where Paul exerted the most creative control over.
>>127997244Yeah I noticed that too a massive discrepancy between Paul trying to be the selfless hero for the band and him being a control freak telling everyone what to do and getting them pissed off in the process
>>127996420She broke his balls
>>127997525The manager dispute this Anon >>127997254 is referring to is really the apex of that conflict. Paul wanted Lee Eastman to manage the band (his wife's father.) But John wanted Allen Klein to manage them because Klein had sucked up to him, and because John had (incorrectly) heard how Klein had gotten The Rolling Stones a lot of money back that the record company had been keeping hidden from them (Klein was actually the one hiding the money from them.) In the end, Klein turned out to be a scammer after all, which is what Paul thought he was, but John had successfully rallied George and Ringo against Paul's choice by that point.
>>127997695What’s your thoughts on Paul having a meltdown at Ringo for delivering a message from John and George saying they’re releasing their Beatles album first before his and that his would get delayed?
>>127996302That's not him that's the other guy. Also John and Paul were secretly gay and in love, hence...
beard Paul mogs all
>>127998158I don't really have many thoughts. What's yours?Would've been interesting to see the meeting happen. Both Paul and Ringo seem to regret how it turned out. Ringo said it's one of the few times he actually saw Paul lose his cool, just screaming in anger; he must've been really bitter about how everything ended, understandably. Ringo apparently just took it too. Guess he only brought out the fists whenever Maureen was involved, cause I know he knocked George the fuck out for screwing her behind his back.I'm pretty sure it was Klein and John specifically that didn't want Paul's solo album competing with a Beatles album on the charts. Personally I don't think they were worried about that at all though, and that it was just pettiness on part of Klein and John in an effort to control Paul a little. Because why would they care about his solo shit? George released solo shit while he was in The Beatles and nobody cared.
>>127996302He was justified in being a dick, since he was the only one who still gave a damn, but I'm pretty sure he was also doing a lot of coke around then.
>>127998263>Also John and Paul were secretly gay and in loveProof?
if i was john i'd be balls deep in him everyday
>>127996302>>127997244>>127997443>knowing this much about 60s one directioni'm really sorry your mom had to take tylenol while pregnant, these posts are always sad to see. doesn't help that this board used to hate the beatles, they really would've bullied you for this back then.
>>127997244In Paul's defense, he was trying to step up after Epstein died and John became more unfocused and eventually disinterested. Not gonna say Paul wasn't pushy and bossy, but no one else wanted to take the reigns.
>>127997149George was cucked, it was just Paul and john
>>127997694She had no business even interacting with the band at all. Just like you or I woudn't. John was a retard who broke the cardinal rule.
>>127996302He's a huge dick to this day>forces record store owner fan to give him back a rare Beatles master tape>doesn't even let them take pictures with himhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OiEMpDCMqYY
>>128003250>>128004084Agreed. I'm also gay, but that's not very relevant to my Beatles knowledge.
>>128004093>defending money-grubbing trust fund boomer leach Paul McCartneyWho pays you?
>>127996324Yeah bringing Yoko into the office, basically, where the four of them and employees were trying to get work done, is inexcusable. Plus, John was ducking into the loo frequently for H, also not good.
>>128004109you think he gets payed?
>>127996302He didn't, it's you who became a giant pussy.
He had to tard wrangle two of the other members, the band would have slip up earlier if it wasn't for him
Paul defense force is here
Paul was The Beatles. John is mid, George is a joke, Ringo was bad.
>>128007294we love our granny
>>128003217True, but Epstein dies in '67 and, honestly, he was checked out by around '65 too. By then he's not making all of the decisions for the group anymore, because they don't want to tour as much; so he's resigned to working in the background, making all of their business deals for them. Brian was not a professional manager, he was a promoter, but he ended up talking his way into managing The Beatles, and they ended up becoming the biggest pop group of the sixties. But all the stress took a toll on him, and he already had issues before all that. He was a mess by the time he died, addicted to lots of drugs, drinking a lot. And his management contract with The Beatles was about to be renegotiated, and he was very paranoid that they were going to either fire him or replace him with someone else. Which I think Paul might have tried to do, if Brian had lived.
>>128008003Wouldn’t surprise me, other bands like Rolling Stones also ditched their long-time producers around 1967 as well (and they chose Allen Klein lol)
>>128004084Canadians are such cucks
>>127996302because he was the only one trying
>>127996302>work ethic and ambition = being a dickNah but carry on being a loser.
>>128007294*billy
john was slacking off and writing bullshit like dig a pony.
>>128007345Well no that's where you're wrong. Ringo's drumming was the key to all of it.
>>127996302John had become a junkie and only cared for his newly found love. Even if he was still a creative musician, his heart just wasn't really there anymoreGeorge was an entitled lazy bum with mood swings, who felt he deserved more voice in the band, even though he didn't bring anything other than half assed ideas and indian crap Ringo was merely a drummer with no ambitions in writing or producingif it wasn't for Paul, The Beatles would have ended once they'd stopped touring
>>128010188Billy shears?
must have really grilled em how Sgt Peppers was considered magnum opus despite their lukewarm enthusiasms to the alter ego idea [Paul's]it's no wonder they slopped together a mixtape right after and go into white
>>127996324the only reason people hate yoko is because she's a woman
>>128012179Yoko seems chill desu
>>128012179She’s annoying
>>127996859/thread
>>127997244Paul was 85% of the Beatles, so...
paul is the woman of the world
>>127996302he was right though
>>128010269half right. He was the glue that kept them friends because he never tried to push them in one direction, and he'd jsut start jamming on his drums to whatever tune the others were plunking out., When shit hit the fan, theyd always think about how they were doing this in front of ringo and souring the mood, which in a sense helped them cool off(a bit)https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6GwVHM_5Wq4
>>128012179https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IaZuMdfCjjY
>>127996302BANG BANG
>>127999691There isn’t any, this fucking homosexual just keeps projecting his lifestyle onto others.
>>128001141>wow why do you care about music on the music board when it's not bingo fits and the bellylints from the 1970s with their underground hit 'dickcheese is the bee knees'
>>128018368>replying to boybandbotDon't you want to watch his an hero stream? It'll be soon if we continue to ignore him.
>>128015603I also just don't see other drummers doing the things he did on songs like a day in the life, something, come together, lovely ritathe man had a feel
>>127997149George was a beta who wanted to be alphaRingo was sigma
>>127997695Ultimately Paul was more in the right here, but he should've put forward an alternative who wouldn't obviously be biased towards him.
