Why does no one talk about them anymore? Has the old userbase been completely replaced?
>>128111535Why would they still be talked about? There's no reason to do so.
>>128111933Because they're mostly good, timeless albums?
>>128111535>Has the old userbase been completely replaced?Yes>Why does no one talk about them anymore?They do. But people prefer to talk about how kpop artists are and how they find women hot
>>128111535there are still plenty of oldfags on /mu/ but the sad reality is that /mu/ is a zoomer and advertiser shill board now that's better for shitposting than actual music discussion. despite this id argue that the overall quality of the board is much better now than it has been in quite a few years
>>128111949>Because they're mostly good, timeless albums?they're notmost of it is low test and boring, with few exceptions here like Nevermind
>>128112048Bad bait
>>128111535>Has the old userbase been completely replaced?yes been that way for quite a while
>>128112056I told you the truth as to why people who weren't here when the hivemind was in full force are now completely nonplussed by what you'd been indoctrinated to worship.
>>128112138I think you listened to beefhart didn't like it listened to MWPP didn't like it and then decided that the rest must also be albums you don't like. Go back to /b/
Psy op
>>128112190now take that and let's say a dozen more random albums from that list and you will have the average experience of a newer /mu/ user who's come to realize this conception of /mu/core ought to be disregardedif you want /mu/core cultists you're more likely to find them on RYM
these albums are from a certain period in time, i think a lot are still good but it's very 2010s codedi don't see a 2020s /mu/core being very good but it'd be interesting to see, i still think a lot of these are decent but don't know what i'd put in a new /mu/core, plus if anyone sincerely tried it'd be shred into a million pieces upon first contact
>>128112248>it's very 2010s codedWell it was made in 2015
>>128112284well it's been 10 years, i'm not saying throw the baby out with the bathwater, i don't think there's consensus as to what's good, more like just people know what's popular and talk about it, no muh epic deep indie cuts like used to be the 'vibe' but maybe board is just so populated it can't be anything but le epic shitpostobscure just to be obscure is obnoxious but just liking what's popular isn't very adventurous either, dunno how you'd make a new list
>>128111535As much as I respect this chart /jazz/ doesn't even come close to being good chart
>>128112372While a new list would be cool I agree with you that it would be an almost impossible task in our modern day and age. But maybe some anons could work together to make a awesome new chart this thread?
if someone decided to be an asshole they could make a fake new /mu/core and just spam it until it's the real new /mu/core and put le epic troll whatever they want on there to influence masses of people, very villainous but possible
>>128112248>codedYou need to go back
>>128112408Just a starting point I think these are all albums the /mu/core chart doesn't have but /mu/tants like
>>128112515i can tear this into shreds in 5 seconds>muh nig rap>muh edgy nirvana omg so good!11!!!>they might be giants - nothing more needs to be said>unwound gay edgy crap>two literally whosi don't actually care but be prepared for lots of that
>>128112515>>128112408if you're going to try, more power to you maybe others will try and join in instead of just tear it down
>>128112515I don't like any of these albums.
>>128112515Anons this is starting to come together
>>128112587What albums do you like then?
>>128112594this just looks like your own personal preferences
>>128112597Old /mu/core albums
>>128112547I think one problem with trying to make these charts is everyone will disagree for example:>>128112587>>128112048
we could try starting from fresh, refreshing our ears, and mass voting on individual albums, or make a committee or something (probably bad idea as that 'committee' would greatly shape the chart from their own biases)issues: can easily be manipulated, probably a lot moreand personally i have some sacred cows I don't want gone if tastes have shifted
>>128112605I don't like Nirvana, Drive Like Jehu, Unwound, and I think while Getting Killed is overrated right now /mu/ has been talking about it and praising it for enough to deserve being on a /mu/core chart. The jazz stuff is based on history and what listening to what fellow jazz listeners and players have said for years. Ride Nowhere is a must listen and The New Sound is some /mu/ jazz fusion
>>128112668well, more power to you for at least trying maybe it's worth a shot
>>128112652>(probably bad idea as that 'committee' would greatly shape the chart from their own biasesWhile true I think if you an open enough "committee" you can get some real music discussion
>>128112706Also I have only heard so much music so I need others to be able to make a "real" chart
>>128112720i just know other boards have been shitted up by tranny discords planning/coordinating how to fuck it up so i'd be sad if that happened to /mu/ too, although i suppose there's no guarantee of that happening
>>128112735for what it's worth I believe other boards in the past did it by just making threads with a 'theme' then voting repeatedly, I believe /lit/ has done that to pick the best books by consensus
Unfortunately a new /mu/core chart would be inevitably worse than the classic one(s) because /mu/'s taste is significantly worse now.
>>128112594Fixed the albums that were already on the old chart turns out I'm blind. I think I'll go till 5x5 but what do you anons think of this
>>128112817Also just to be clear this chart isn't to replace but to be an extension of the old /mu/ chart
>>128111535ITAOS sucks major ass. Terrible album.
>>128112211This
>>128112817Anons what do you all think of this?
I miss old /mu/.Where is the ITAOTS spam? Where are Last.fm and share threads?
>>128113130>Where are Last.fm and share threads?>>128097617Anons make a new one every day or so. While /mu/ is a terrible right now from all the celebfag threads there are still plenty of good threads
Damn I really made it. I remember being 14 seeing the essentials chart for the first time and being daunted by it. I haven't looked at it in years but now at almost 30 I think I've listened to almost every single album on here just naturally from exploring on my own. 14 year old me would think that was so cool if he didn't know I'm also a broke loser now.
>>128113200It took you 15-17 years to listen to like 300 albums?
>>128113066i see a lot of ariel pink spam sometimes. there's always people saying its him making the thread but i have no idea. idk maybe he should count
>>128111535because it's 90% garbage
>>128113266I don't know enough about him to put him in. Do you have any examples of ariel pink spam?
>>128113216No dumbass I mean I've listened to 1000s of albums over that time and now when I see this chart I see a bunch of albums I've listened to, unlike when I first saw it and it was unfamiliar.
>>128113335Tell us the 10%
>>128113339https://desuarchive.org/mu/thread/128057480/https://desuarchive.org/mu/thread/128094843/https://desuarchive.org/mu/thread/127793204/https://desuarchive.org/mu/thread/127867760/https://desuarchive.org/mu/thread/127715464/https://desuarchive.org/mu/thread/127751639/
>>128113468Well would you look at that people like it might as well put it in thank you anon
ariel pink is great
I forgot about some more albums /mu/ talks about
>>128113685>talk about =/= /mu/corebut if im just sitting here criticizing youi suppose it's not a bad start if we're 10 years behind
>>128113685replace Brat with something else that bitch made i'm so mad at her for selling out
>>128113066Fuck this crap chart, 6 jazz albums, but zero representation for my favorite genres. >>128113335 True, if /mu/ core were the only music that exists, I'd rather read a book or play videogame.
>>128113704As much as I want this be kino since I'm the only person I need to rely on what I've seen people on /mu/ think are good albums
>>128113717>Fuck this crap chart, 6 jazz albums, but zero representation for my favorite genres. Go on...>>128113711Yeah the more I think about it brat is a shitty pick got any ideas what to replace it with?
>>128113735im biased towards charli so i'd say pop 2 but if you'd rather have some other album thats fine. fags do get hostile sometimes
>>128112495To?
>>128113778Good with pop 2
>>128113685Missing this.
>>128113796Agree
>>128112817Getting killed is despised on the board
>>128113838Half loved half despised that's true for some stuff on the /mu/core board today anyway
>>128113130I stopped making sharethreads myself because they became useless. I'll post stuff if other people start one
More and also a bit less shitty then prev version
>>128113894This is an obvious one.
>>128111535what needs to be said has already been said so theres nothing left
>>128111535i hope so
>>128113796had tried this because the cover was cool and thought it was trash
this shit ain't /mu/core but it FUCKING should beRIP lee perry man. that was one of the worst days in recent memory
>>128111535>Master of PuppetsNeeds to be replaced with St Anger>Saturday Night WristNeeds to be replaced with White Pony or Around The Fur>KornNeeds to be replaced with Take A Look In The Mirror
>>128113348riff abundant albums = goodriff lacking albums = bad
Alright anons I think this is starting to look good
>>128114367Looks as good as Pissgrave covers, you're lucky there's no downvote button on 4chan.
>>128114529Name one album
>>128114367we have new /mu/ corenow what
>>128114556Manually add it to the /mu/core chart and make it the new /mu/core chart on the wiki I guess
>>128114556Not new /mu/core yet right now it's just the chart of one guy and a couple of anons suggestions
>>128114586thats the definition of /mu/coreold /mu/core was that too
>>128114594I guess but I've got a sense that my chart could be better
>>128114586once it gets really big we should do a series of polls to trim fat. like simple yes or no "do you like this" stuff. i know modern /mu/ is mostly dead but i remember at least one of those bracket threads happening like a year or two ago so there's a chance!
>>128114616I would love to see that video do you have the link?
>>128114628i broke the bot guys
where's the bot
>>128114367I know there's already a sizable jazz representation, but I'm surprised there's no Wes Montgomery in the original. We should add Smokin' At The Half Note
>>128115195As good as that album is I don't think /mu/ even knows who Wes Montgomery is
>>128112831Call it the ten year anniversary special deluxe edition
>>128113527He’s a shill. Don’t fall for it >>128113796No>>128113908Fuck off
>>128115342kek
>>128115372Good albums that /mu/ likes
>>128115262I feel like he gets mentioned often enough in jazz threads.
>>128115463You know what since it has Grant Green Smokin' At The Half Note has to be in there too. Starting to worry this has become a /jazz/ chart with some /mu/core
>>128114628https://desuarchive.org/mu/thread/92198450/#92202196 found it
>>128114367You should add Jorge Ben. I feel like I see him in pretty much every chart thread now.
>>128115507You could replace Miles Davis' Relaxin' or Workin'. No need to have both I would think.
>>128115627I have to resist to put in the entire prodigy record series. The problem is that each jazz record has it's own sound, tunes, and mood making it where jazz chart either has too little or to much of the same artists over and over again
This is the last one for today. Think I'm gonna make a thread for this tommorow here's the topsters.org file make your changes anonshttps://files.catbox.moe/enm07l.topster
>>128115706Posted the wrong link fmlhttps://files.catbox.moe/rkvs52.topster
>>128115706Garbage chart, all it did was add 4 recent acclaimed albums, while filling 1/4 of it with jazz, leaving whole genres with no representation. On the positive side, at least there's only 1 rap album, instead of the sea of crap OP originally posted.
>>128115957The /mu/core charts jazz list is missing some of the most essential must listen to jazz albums of all time. Do you expect me to not remedy such a disgusting action? In regards to the whole genres with no rep thing that old chart has bleeps and covered and I don't listen to enough metal to feel like I'm worthy to put any in the chart. If you want more fusion or some shit like that complain to /mu/ not me
>>128115706Why isn't there more hip-hop? There's only MF DOOM and Death Grips who both have a plenty of representation on the original chart. Why not put something more recent or some artists that aren't on the original chart(I think JPEGMAFIA would be fine). F#A# is already on the 2015 one. I wouldn't put the new Ariel Pibk album on there since it's fairly recent(couple of weeks) and I haven't seen much discussion about it unlike Getting Killes. I think putting Brat on the chart wouldn't really be a bad idea. I feel like either BC,NR or Black Midi should be there
>>128116248Brat was on it before but it got replaced with pop 2 from an anon who likes charlie 10x more then I do. As for hi pop /mu/ isn't really talking about hip hop enough to know what albums they like from what I've seen (other then MF DOOM and how black people music sucks). >I feel like either BC,NR or Black Midi should be thereAgree should have both
Ok for real now done for the day goodnight 4chanhttps://files.catbox.moe/0wlofx.topster
And for all you jazz hating losers here you go
this is a Fool's Errand but if you're going to try you're going to try good luck to you!
Your bias about jazz is showingI don't give a fuck about jazzHence why no single individual should be the sole chart makerBetter some schmuck than no schmuck I suppose
Just some suggestions
lets make this a realityi don't care if its fucking dog shita 2020s /mu/coreif it's fucking shit someone will show up and make it betterbetter than nothing
>>128116003>The /mu/core charts jazz list is missing some of the most essential must listen to jazz albums of all time. Do you expect me to not remedy such a disgusting action?You have a fundamental misunderstanding of what /mu/core was, is, and should be. That's why your shitty list won't be taken seriously.
>>128118088what is the fundamental understanding of what /mu/core is?
>>128111535/む/core
>>128118136meme albums
>>128118136/mu/core sucks. If we want this to really be /mu/core, it needs to have a bunch of redundant k-pop albums that take over the whole chart
you need real ears to hear /mu/core people say it sucks now, but they're just dismissing it from surface level noise, they don't actually analyze itan anon said /mu/core would be dead because taste is bad todaypeople will just listen to the surface level noise and not the deeper meaning, most of /mu/core has a deeper meaning to it besides what your ear first hears, but you need to pay actual attention to hear it, something lost in our tiktok smartphone era.
Just thought of a new meme: nu/mu/core, sucks
>>128117726100% agree with Boces
>>128118088If your /jazz/ chart doesn't contain albums everyone on /jazz/ should of heard a million times before it fails as a /jazz/ chart
>>128116807>Popshart>Trannyshart>ZoomershartWow /mu/ is really dead isn't it?
>>128111535Because the hipster era died OP (THANK GOD!) now shut the fuck up and stop whining faggot. You can literally make any thread any band you want RIGHT NOW but instead you are whining.
bump
>>128111535>Has the old userbase been completely replaced?yesonce zoomers reach critical mass in a discussion forum, everyone else leavesthey're so retarded that they're not even fun to shitpost with
>>128117726Squarepusher is definitely /mu/core.
>>128111535They moved on for good reasons, you should probably too.Past a point, an infection gets bad enough where theres not much you can do, if anything. Look into the "indie websphere" or whatever. Nearly all /mu/core has it's respect in the albums' niche or circles, so be aware of what you like and try to get involved in those scenes. They still and will always exist...
I’ll do a zoomer approved /mu/core mixtape. Has to be <90minutes
