[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/mu/ - Music


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: Talktalkalbumcover.jpg (7 KB, 316x316)
7 KB
7 KB JPG
>bro get into talk talk chronologically
>listen to this
>it's boring dogshit
Their other albums better be good
>>
>>128242680
They are two different bands completely from Colour of Spring onwards, but to call their early new wave stuff boring dogshit is retarded, it's catchy pop songs
All you do to me is TALK TALK
>>
>>128242680
>Their other albums better be good
i fell for it too OP, it's really not worth listening to. a lot of talk talk fans are bitter boomers, angry that their shitty new wave band isn't as remembered as actual good 80s new wave bands like tears for fears. also the last two "epic post rock" albums fucking suck. replies to this post will be seething at this trvthnvke btw, but i'm right and they're wrong.
>>
>>128242707
HOLY BASED
>>
imagine being that desperate for (you)s
>>
>>128242680
filtered



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.