/mu/ - Chicago: Live At Carnegie Hall [Columbia, 1971] I' - Music

Anonymous

10/30/25(Thu)10:54:23 No.128284531

File: s-l400.jpg (68 KB, 760x507)

Anonymous 10/30/25(Thu)10:54:23 No.128284531 Archived

Chicago: Live At Carnegie Hall [Columbia, 1971]
I'm not claiming to have actually listened to this four-disc set (you think I'm a nut?) But an event this monumental is too big to ignore and Chicago are a C minus group if ever I heard one. Anyway, the packaging offers contextual support for my opinion--shrink wrap so loose that prospective consumers buying it for their girlfriends as a Christmas gift will think they have a review copy, while the absence of sleeve liners means the only way to avoid scratching these plastic documents is to lay the whole shebang out on the coffee table and never touch it again. C-

Anonymous
10/30/25(Thu)11:12:50 No.128284742

Anonymous 10/30/25(Thu)11:12:50 No.128284742

>>128284531
Was this the first review he did where he admits he doesn't actually listen to some albums and he's just reviewing the cover art?

Anonymous
10/30/25(Thu)11:27:40 No.128284922

Anonymous 10/30/25(Thu)11:27:40 No.128284922

>>128284742
you don't have to review shit. for me'd be vampire weekend or anco to give an example

Anonymous
10/30/25(Thu)11:28:58 No.128284936

Anonymous 10/30/25(Thu)11:28:58 No.128284936

early Chicago weren't bad but by this point they were already on the road to commercial buttrock

Anonymous
10/30/25(Thu)12:14:51 No.128285340

Anonymous 10/30/25(Thu)12:14:51 No.128285340

>it's bad because... it's just bad OKAY
>also the packaging sucks
bravo cuckgau

Anonymous
10/30/25(Thu)12:35:42 No.128285548

Anonymous 10/30/25(Thu)12:35:42 No.128285548

>>128285340
the point was he was joking that the shitty packaging showed that CBS clearly knew the album was garbage

Anonymous
10/30/25(Thu)12:44:36 No.128285657

Anonymous 10/30/25(Thu)12:44:36 No.128285657

>>128285548
well that's not funny