yikes
>listen to basically any 60s stones>it's goodthank you brian mick keith charlie bill and ian, very cool
>>128317677Criminally underrated
>>128317677This album does kind of straight up suck but I like bits and pieces of it.
>2000 light years from home>Citadel>She's a rainbowGreat songs, everything else sucks, so it's basically like every Stones album in that regard
>>1283183792000 light years from home sounds extremely corny to me, it's a naive attempt at psychedelic/noise space rock in my opinion. Maybe it's just me but the Stones never came across as an earnest band in any of their sonic experimentation even though they accidentally stumbled into interesting songs here and there
>>128318393sounds like a (you) problem
>>128318379None of those are the album's best song, In Another Land
>>128317677Citadel riff goes fucking hard
>>128317677it's a decent album, some great classic Stones songs with the rest being filler mostly, but still a bit enjoyablewouldn't call it a 'yikes' really
>>128317677>Rip off the cover of Sgt. Peppers>Decades later people still say the music rips it off even though it goes for a completely different sound>People judge it based on that association and often make it apparent they've never even tried to listen to itPeople are LITERALLY judging this album by its cover, it's actually quite neat. It's odd for a Rolling Stones album yes, but they were clearly going down this path for a while if you follow their 60s output.
>>128317677Goes hard
>>128320658It's not a Beatles ripoff, it's clearly a Velvet Underground ripoff, which is worse
