if she cared about becoming president and really tried, do you think taylor swift would be able to be elected as the president of the united states?
Not cute enough. Olivia though?
>>128319629Yes
>>128319645would you want her as president or vice president?
>>128319629Not a chance. Anyone who isn't a rabbif swiftie who buys 30 copies of her latest album, is painfully obvious to see that is a manipulative, narcisistic awful human being.She is more overtly narcisistic than the likes of Trump and Hillary.
>>128319645Olivia's music saved my life. Taylor is one of the greatest for sure, but there is no spiritual core you get with 'liv Dawg. You feel me?
>>128319673To be honest she is really smart. I think she could technically do it. But she needs to work on her clothing choices. She's prettier than that.
>>128319678i feel like she'd implement good programs though
>>128319694based rodrigo supporting education, reproductive rights, and protection from violenceif she was president, she could expand her power further to help other groups too
>>128319678Go to bed Sabrina.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XiS2fgPVYvA
Swift Grande ticket?
>>128319777we wear her official merch hats to support her campaign
>>128319629>>128319673yes, and more importantly, she would be a great president.before the /pol/ tourist MAGA trash start screeching about how Tay endorsed Kamala or whatever, consider the following:As often stated/sniveled about here, her undeniable pecuniary success isn't a function of her own talent, but rather a business machine set in motion by her dad. But, history has shown that just because you come from insane privilege, doesn't guarantee success in any sense, especially if you're an idiot and start drinking your own kool-aid thinking that you "built it yourself" or that you're somehow "self-made".A great president doesn't necessarily need to be smart or gifted, the only characteristics that will make a great president are charisma (which, despite the incel sniveleing, Tay most certainly has), and most importantly, she needs to surround herself with a cabinet of very, very smart people, and listens to those very smart people, which she has already demonstrated she can do.I think she should be Newsom's running mate in 2028, and pres in 2032.And hopefully they'll be able to start to un-fuck the country from this Heritage Foundation/P2025 MAGA trash nonsense.
>>128319815omg we can have Glinda the Good in office!
taylor coming across as such a normie politically would do wondersshe's progressive enough for many progressives to support her, but she's not radical enough to scare off the less progressivepeople make up shit about her being secretly MAGA, but if it came down to voting Swift vs Trump or whatever other nominee there would be, so many people would vote Swift for being basic>>128319834>A great president doesn't necessarily need to be smart or gifted, the only characteristics that will make a great president are charisma (which, despite the incel sniveleing, Tay most certainly has), and most importantly, she needs to surround herself with a cabinet of very, very smart people, and listens to those very smart people, which she has already demonstrated she can do.agreed. she already connects with people way better than most politicians do
I WANNA SEE OLIVIA’s RODRIGO
>>128319968Keep it 100
>>128319968By>RODRIGOare you talking aboutRODRIGO 2028?
>>128319629Swift having fans worldwide would be great for diplomacy
She would kill millions with a ruthless moral code what an honor to have daddy Taylor crush my windpipe with her heels omg
>>128319715>"reproductive rights"I'm not 100% pro-life but come the fuck on
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=swYMG7X1iDQ
>>128320108>i'm just hoping I don't repeat historyme too grandehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tcYodQoapMg
>>128319828Would >Leave it with me>I protect the familybe a good slogan, or would you prefer another Swift lyric?
Baste Ari being fierce with no apologies
>>128320108>>128320134>zelenskyy plays president>becomes actual president>well liked by his people>grande plays presidenthmmm
>feeling cute>feeling bratty >feeling juiced up>feeling down too>moisturized evenIt really is just like that.
>>128319629yes! Tay 2032 and 2036!
didn't we try running a woman for president twice and it was less than successful?
>>128320824yeah, but they weren't taylor swift
>>128320824^This. Women cannot be leaders and everyone knows it.
When taylor swift gets married, do you think it might be like america's royal wedding?
>>128320824they were famously unlikeable
>>128319842Presidents in ballgowns!
I vote for Taylor Alison.Imagine the lesbo orgies in the Oval Office!
ITT: One Poojeet samefags for hours
>>128319629We will be cursed with celebrity presidents every few elections now since Reagan and Trump did it it's a guaranteed formula
>>128320854reminds me that Michael Jackson was treated like royalty when he went abroad
>>128319629Vote for Swift and she will want your healthcare to be fundedpeople.com/taylor-swift-donates-100k-to-young-fan-battling-cancer-sending-biggest-hug-11832389
>>128321397>buh buh billionaire hoarding cash>buh buh private jetMAGA trash will never go for Tay being president.The thing is, on the "buh buh she uses a private jet so how much can she care about the environment?" bullshit:Think about that for a hot minute - if Taylor swift flew first with the commoners, they would basically have to shut down the terminal every time she flew, there would be massive inconvenience and hassle for all the people who aren't Taylor Swift. So yeah, in this case, it makes perfect sense that she uses a private jet.>buh buh liberulz in private jets! champagne socialists! and so forthyeah they'll never go for it. But i think Tay would be an absolutely fantastic president.
>>128320994>implying Michael Jackson wasn't royalty... you know, he was like royalty, similar in certain ways to, say, Prince Andrew
>>128321454he was crowned king for Sanwi
Yes and she's one out of maybe like five celebrities
>>128319629Yes 100% and i'm surprised democrats haven't tried running a milquetoast liberal superstar to counter trump's cult of personality, seems like a safer bet than running a geriatric pedophile or a charisma vacuum like Kamala
she should run for president in 2028 in my opinion
>>128319629>>128319645SWIFT-RODRIGO 2032 let's get it going faggots
>>128321993people saying 2032 are saying to delay it so it may never happen. 2028 is better in my opinion
>>128321993>SWIFT-RODRIGOif the country was run by cute pop stars, i'd would actively want to pay attention to the news everyday
>>128319752Jump off a bridge, namefag.
>>128321397She would also fund educationhttps://www.theguardian.com/music/2020/aug/20/taylor-swift-donates-23000-to-help-student-go-to-universitySwift made the contribution via a GoFundMe page. Alongside the donation for £23,373, the US pop star wrote: “Vitoria, I came across your story online and am so inspired by your drive and dedication to turning your dreams into reality.“I want to gift you the rest of your goal amount. Good luck with everything you do! Love, Taylor.”
>>128319629Of course she would win every state like Reagan. But she wouldn't want to be president its a job only attractive to psycopaths and lunatics and she is too sane.
>>128321993You have to be at least 35 to be president. OR won't be eligible until 2040.
>>128319629Bad Bunny would be a good president and is eligible.
>>128324268LOL I would support a Taylor Swift / Bad Bunny ticket. They unironically would do great things for the USA
>>128319629>guve the nuclear codes to a mentally unstable cunt that is out of her mind for a week every month
>>128324198If we can allow Trump to run for a third term we can overlook the VP being a cute 29 year old filipino chick
>>128319629Yes, Taylor Swift would be a great president.>>128325332>as opposed to giving the nuclear codes to a mentally unstable geriatric that is out of his mind all the timeMAGA trash detected
>>128325850Trump won libtard, eat shit :^)
>>128324280me too
>>128325715I, personally, would overlook it but it's not my decision, and I'm under the impression that people whose decision it is would see differently
