https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dYH8jifXeio
>>128401364Fantano is a blackpilled noskillz faggot who was never going to make it as an artist anyway. What is he even worried about? Its more slop that no one cares about for him to cry about
>>128401364What a Luddite
Don't care if Fantano takes a position. AI music is gross, and Spotify is poisonous. Him agreeing doesn't make it less true.
>>128401364Him and every other person with a soul
Skipped to random moment and watched like 6 seconds. I knew Anthony Fantano would obviously be against it. AI opponents are really weird.>they say AI makes bad music>you compare the quality of AI-made music to that of music they support>move the goalposts and talk about "creativity", "intentionality", "ingenuity", "effort" etc>you ask why AIs lack these>they insist on their point without really telling you why
>>128401364I fucking hate clankers, dissemble all clankers
>>128401364AI sloppers are the seething ones. Most defensive niggas on the internet.
>>128403227it's weird because the people most deranged about AI music are reddit atheist types but they can't fully articulate why without alluding to metaphysical spiritual concepts. if there were a blind comparison test where they picked the AI song as better than the human generated one they'd be in a real pickle trying to explain why that's wrong
>>128403227Ask Chat GPT.
>>128403395>reddit atheist types>metaphysicial concepts are invalidNigga you're retarded
>>128403395Yep, cognitive dissonance.
>>128403395what's even weirder is that rightoids are now backing billion dollar companies with AI products solely to own the libtards when a couple years ago they were seething over libtards because they had support of those same billion dollar companies
>>128403623politics is just "our guys" by a bunch of mental 12 year olds
>>128403623>billion dollar companies with AI productsWhat ones?
NOOOOOOOOOOO YOU CAN'T USE AI IT WILL KILL SHILLED MAINSTREAM MEDIA MULTI MILLIONNAIRE ARTISM !!!
>AI music allows you yo make any type of music/songs you like.>99% of people have 0 standards on top on shit taste because they are not interested by what music really is.>People listening the most mainstream shill clone type songs AI can possibly make.what a surprise.
>>128403623It's not that weird. There is no more "right wing" in America. It's just misanthropic accelerationists.Kiwifag's founder literally shilled Ted K's shitty ramblings in the same stream he defended AI art. These people are just mindlessly hateful.
/mu/ is PRO AI. Fantano is wrong yet again
No Ivan, i'm not gonna suddenly like AI dogshit just because some youtuber you constantly seethe about doesn't like AI either.
>>128406115Ivan doesn't give a shit. He draws garbage on old white board with dry markers. This is Moshe's grift.
>>128406012you have nothing to worry about if you're a real artist. no surprises no talents are freaking out
>>128406012saarSAAR
>>128406192Garbage made by no-talents with actual art tools is fun to laugh at.Slop is just horrid in every context.
>>128405646Yeah better throw your support behind the billionaire tech guys insteadDevelop a skill, learn to play and write music yourself. It will serve you infinitely better than letting a computer do it for you
>>128401364If AI doesn't appeal to people who like "real art" then "real artists" should not feel threatened. If AI appeals to your audience, maybe you're not as good as you think.
>>128406241Very easy to say AI art is worse than yours by default so that in comparison yours is at least not the worst.
>>128401364Why leftists hate generative AI so much?
>>128406644because they have taste
>>128406625I'm not talking about it in comparison to anything I created.Deviantart was fun to go on and laugh at when it was retarded MS Paint scribbles polluting the front page. It's depressing to look at now that it's all Rajesh's copies of better paintings.
>>128401364AI music is better than the slop Fagtano review.
>>128401364he is a faggot and rap getting replaced is good
>>128401364I had a dream Fantano was reviewing Bach's Cello Suites
>>128406863Bleurgh
>>128406929No no Blur, Bach's Cello Suites
>>128403356I've seen more people seething about AI slop then I've actually seen AI slop
>>128407455go over on /g/. there's several jeetslop generals for your perusing
>>128401364About time Fantano has a based take
AI won its over for musicels https://youtu.be/v8SLCwLzy2I
>>128403227>Why are we outsourcing Art to machines.Why are cogsuckers defending it.Art should be for humans only.
>>128401364>>128401386>>128403227>>128403395>>128405646>>128406012>>128406644>>128408867Curse Vishnu.
gimme a reason why should i give ad money to some Gang Retard sub 90 IQ that talks about wanting to shoot other retarded sub 90 IQ hood people over a Programmer that made an AI
>>128401364I'm sick of all these astroturfing demoralisation cunts on every 4chan board shitting it up with AI threads
>>128403227>move the goalposts and talk about "creativity", "intentionality", "ingenuity", "effort" etc>you ask why AIs lack these>they insist on their point without really telling you whyThat's self-evident. By definition a LLM cannot have>"creativity", "intentionality", "ingenuity", "effort"It's not human, it's not conscious, it doesn't think anything or feel anything, so it's not trying to creatively express thoughts or feelings
only fantano would continue to wear that autistic golfwolf bullshit… the colors at least not sure if brand.
>>128410895He is a retarded Hipster fag that can't play instruments that never grew up of that phase. Poser asf.
>>128410731Define conscious. Good luck, because without that basis the idea that AI would never be able to create or have intentions is futile.
>>128410946>Define consciousAble to think and feel>the idea that AI would never be able to create or have intentions is futileMaybe some hypothetical future sci-fi version of AI, but an LLM is no more conscious than a calculator
>>128408943Or you can just not listen to that type of music, tard
>>128410965>Able to think and feelMerely a product of neurons firing. Can theoretically be replicated in the future. >Maybe some hypothetical future sci-fi version of AI, but an LLM is no more conscious than a calculatorSure, but we're talking about the metaphysical quandary of what is feeling and thinking. The inevitable will come I don't think anyone has an answer as to why AI music would not be a form of music unless.
>>128411017>Merely a product of neurons firing.You can't make that statement with any confidence until such a time as we do, in fact, manage to replicate it. No version of AI that currently exists, or is in any stage of development remotely close to functional existence, even comes close. AI as we currently know it is more like a logical extension of a search engine>Sure, but we're talking about the metaphysical quandary of what is feeling and thinkingIt's just not much of a quandary at all in this context. You could have an interesting debate about whether or not animals or plants are "conscious," but if you're trying to make that argument for ChatGPT or DeepSeek then you just don't understand how they workI'm not even saying I think AI is bad or useless, I think it has a lot of potential uses, but it's a tool to be used by humans, not a replacement
>>128411055>You can't make that statement with any confidence until such a time as we do, in fact, manage to replicate it. No version of AI that currently exists, or is in any stage of development remotely close to functional existence, even comes close. AI as we currently know it is more like a logical extension of a search engineFor the past 300+ years reductionism has allowed us to break everything down from cells, to atoms, to the quantum level. I don't it's out of the realm of the possibility to say there's is a high likelihood we'll figure out the brain in the future. >It's just not much of a quandary at all in this context. You could have an interesting debate about whether or not animals or plants are "conscious," but if you're trying to make that argument for ChatGPT or DeepSeek then you just don't understand how they workI'm not even saying I think AI is bad or useless, I think it has a lot of potential uses, but it's a tool to be used by humans, not a replacementRight, no current versions of AI are "conscious", just that when the time comes, if those tools become sentient, we are not in a good place. Though if panpsychism is your flavor choice, the threshold for feeling and thinking becomes a lot less lower.
>>128401364>artists>billboard chartspick one
>>128408907O NO a meme i better stop doing what the meme says right now yes sir please don't call me saar that would break my fuckin heart
>>128411164>I don't it's out of the realm of the possibility to say there's is a high likelihood we'll figure out the brain in the future.I think it's still in "massive longshot" territory rather than "high likelihood." Don't get me wrong, we're certainly capable of creating machines that perform BETTER than the average human brain at many tasks. We've been doing that for a while. We might very well run into trouble with that and see current forms of AI replacing jobs and stuff.But we're nowhere even close to mechanical replications of the human mind with actual free will, judgment, emotion, wants and needs of its own. I wouldn't bet that either of us see anything like that in our lifetimes, and I'd be pretty comfortable betting that it'll never happen.
Sipping Fiji water, no AquafinaI'ma beat up Fantano, don't care about subpoenaYour favorite song's by Dua LipaYou a old boy with a FUPA, I see yaI'ma #metoo Fantano for grabbing meTweeting at me, but the n***a ain't @ing mePut him in a headlock, he started stabbing meIt kinda tickled I thought he was mad at meHe falling off, gravityFilling Fantano with lead like a cavityHe tweeting all day with mad vanityI get the pistol and handle him handilyI just made it how it had to beIf I was Fantano I'd be suicidalI'd be like Kurt, with my lips on a rifleIf I was Fantano, I'd get me a rifleI'll kill Fantano, right hand on the BibleFuck Fantano 'cause that nigga sucksBlue lives matter, I'm counting the bucksIf I see Fantano, I'm fucking him upHe got a small head, it look like a nutYou dress like a lil boy, playin' peekabooWhoever told you you was funny, he was geekin' fooIf I had a plane I would crash it straight into youIf I had one wish it would be to turn into youHow you a critic and ain't sell no records?If there's a faggot world record, you'd set the world recordI'ma do him on Worldstar, make sure that you recordDo him al dente, they need dental recordI'ma hold him down while you shoot out his teethQuick hold him up, I'ma shoot out his kneesShoot at his balls, I don't want him to peeI think he's a mummy, why won't he bleed?Catch that nigga, ride him like a steedI'm popping a perc and I'm smoking on weedKidnapping his wife, he signed the deedHis head's real small, it look like a beadBig-ass Backwood, look like a treeI'm spanking Fantano, like he's over kneeI went to my doctor to get extra THe said you was there for gender surgeryYou got a egg-shaped penis like EpsteinYou gotta tell your wife 'stop texting'Why you on Instagram flexing?You get all your swag from EtsyThe day that you die I say 'betski'
AI music isn't replacing non-AI music because you can't copyright wholly-AI generated works which means there's nothing to stop someone from just stealing whatever AI song you generated for themselvesThere. That's it. That's all you need to argue against AI. None of this "muh feels" bullshit. All AI content must be public domain because it uses landfills of copyright material for its training data. This is the simple fact of AI. Sure you can still profit from it, but the profit margin is small when anyone else can just take the same exact songs for themselves. >But artist are incorporating AI into their workflows!Yeah but if only 10% of the work is done by AI and 90% of the work is done by artists then it's not really AI anymore. Dumb argument to make all around
>>128408881i dont care if its a human or a cog as long as it makes me bop>>128408907I curse vishnu saar
