[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/mu/ - Music


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1736201432750.jpg (25 KB, 450x320)
25 KB
25 KB JPG
>"[genre] revival"
>>
File: Fl14X8QWQAQECc3.jpg (87 KB, 538x528)
87 KB
87 KB JPG
some genre revivals can be good sometimes
>>
>>128493475
>Genre revival > first wave of genre
Every. Single. Time.
>>
>>128493475
Interpol is good
>>
>"art [genre]"
>>
>>128495081
Kate Bush is good
>>
>>128494957
This, and ironically
>>
>bandwagoners aping a music genre a few years after it became a thing
>:0
>revivalists aping a music genre decades after it became a thing
>:/
I mean, some people shit on, let's say, good post punk revival bands, but then listen to third rate post punk bands from the '80s
>>
>>128496318
there are more good third-rate 80s post-punk bands than there are good post-punk revival bands
>>
>>128493475
Dance punk revival is better than dance punk.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.