Live recordings are so trash, what is the appeal? I can obviously understand if the song has only ever been recorded live, but otherwise, lmao>Hmm, should I listen to [Song] or to [Song recorded through shitty microphones with a bunch of background noise, EQ issues, and a mistake here and there]? Hmmm...>B-b-but being bad gives it LE PERSONALITYHahaha, what the fuck
>>128504852>I listen to bad musicians Yeah, we can tell.
>>128504852such a pedestrian take
Agreednothing to discuss here, studio + edited has a better sound quality
>not imagining yourself being in the concert living the moment damn is this aphantasia level 5?
>>128504868I don't like concerts thoughbeit. I always prefer studio / digital compositions.
>>128504861Even if the band never makes any mistakes / adds no shitty variations and the sound team is godtier, at beast you're always going to end up with an inferior version to the studio version, so what's your argument here?
>>128504852better question is why listen to a studio album with phony adjustments and alterations when you could listen to a recording of the songs actually being performed?listening to live albums, demos and other raw recordings is the antithesis and antidote to the age of DAW production and of AI slop
>>128505152That's like asking "why would you see the original movie when you can watch a VHS recording of the movie theater screen instead." Are you OK my man?
>>128505162Different mediums
if the musician is talented enough the live version can be superior to the studio version despite lesser audio qualityhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aXi8lJYAhQw
>>128504852Kek is that trump?
>>128505499No, just a random anime girl
>girlwho's gonna tell him?
>>128505580>draws a girl>calls it a malewho cares
