https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-HGW-6V7vHI>I think I'm dumb10/10
>>128505237Kurt's demos were better than most of his studio output
>>128507109demos are usually better than studio on average
>>128507175Lol
>>128507194dont tell me, you actually enjoy that corporate sanitation?
>>128505237Nirvana never made one good acoustic song.a lot of their electric stuff was pretty good tho.acoustic stuff just revealed how rudimentary the chord changes and melodies often were.
>>128507285I find than a few musicians find that the simpler the better, and some musicans just can't hack it but for kurt he just had that dawg in him idk what else to say
>>128507473there is nothing i find musically interesting about this. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AhcttcXcRYY it's chord changes anyone who's listened to a lot of rock has heard a million times, the melody is barely more advanced than a sing-songy nursery rhyme. same with polly, dumb, all apologies, etc. if people didn't know it was nirvana, they would have regarded it as indistinguisable from the millions of other boring songs they ignore.Here's an acoustic song i heard in the grocery store yesterday. Now Neil Young knew how to write interesting acoustic songs. Unexpected melody parts, and cool acoustic rhythms, etc. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sSWxU-mirqg
>>128507109I've preferred listening to Kurt's demos and various fan-remixes over most of Nirvana for the last 4 years. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EgFosAq8kLo&https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLPlb32jRyMm9oBQvYCtdp4ToI-lRIvyPM
