[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/mu/ - Music


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: yaddayadda.png (224 KB, 671x562)
224 KB
224 KB PNG
Can we please stop pretending Joshua Minsoo Kim is a serious critic? I understand that people in the scene respect him because he interviews legendary avant-garde figures, but to me that's more of an indication of how desperate anyone outside of the mainstream is for exposure, and as such his popularity acts as an indictment of the entire music industry. In my head I always think of Kim as the "Anthony Fantano of experimental music", but at least Fantano seems to have an enthusiasm for the music he reviews, whereas Kim seems to want to reference the outer reaches of art only to have them act in the stead of the personality he so sorely lacks. If music criticism has a dead end, it's not the misinformed ramblings of the typical RYM user, it's the haphazard arrogance of JMK's Twitter feed.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.