>album from the 70s/80s>8 tracks, 40 minutes>album from 2025>~30 tracks, half of them demos or remixes, runtime is counted in hours
>>128861966That bad habit started in the 90s with CD bloat when it became necessary to have 20 tracks per album to pad out the run time.
it doobie like that
>>128861966name 3 examples of the latter
>album from the 70s/80s>runtime is about 30 minutes only>other great songs were recorded during the same sessions, but they were released as b-sides of the singles instead of being included in the albumwhich is worse
i mean if you listen to 10 year anniversary albums of bands from the 2010s then yeah thats what you're gonna get
It goes It goes It goes
>>128861966More is more.
>>128862821any mainstream rap album released in the past decade
>>128862994That's more common in the 60s, I think.Not to be picky...
>>128862994quality over quantity. things got fucked up when they decided 40+ minutes was the standard since most bands can't hack it
