[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/mu/ - Music


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1000025983.jpg (88 KB, 750x563)
88 KB
88 KB JPG
Alright let's settle this, /mu.

Who did it better? And why is it Slowdive?
>>
Slowdive I dont like , I much prefer Ride
>>
>>128886940
>being this passive aggressive about it
womanly behavior. loveless literally concluded the genre btw and nothing slowdive made is near the quality of when you sleep or only shallow
>>
not comparable. they had totally different aims
>>
>>128886997
How can you say that?! Loveless _commenced_ the genre!! At least for the mainstream.
>>
>>128886983
But mbv or Slowdive?
>>
Also you guys are being really rude. OP here. I purchased a Slowdive shirt and I want to wear it proudly. Not being worried that the mbv fans are gonna hate me.
>>
Curve are better than both.
>>
File: IMG_4642.jpg (40 KB, 600x747)
40 KB
40 KB JPG
>>128889928
honestly… I’m taking Lush over Slowdive too.
Lush were real-deal zine-making indie kids who got signed to 4AD in the late 80s, worked with Robin Guthrie, and had a prodigious understanding of hookcraft… they wrote classics. “De-Luxe” and “Nothing Natural” are incredible songs.
“Alison” and “Machine Gun” are fine — “When The Sun Hits” and “Dagger” are great, even — but the majority of Slowdive’s material really washes through you, in one ear out the other.
Which I suspect is the point? I get the appeal, I just prefer my shoegaze do have a little more sex appeal and zest for life,
>>
>>128890121
Gross.

Listen to Slowdive's reunion and their b-sides. Maybe then you'll understand. Get your hand off your cock.
>>
>>128891630
Slowdive reunion is boring indie reverb rock
>>
>>128891786
It's their best record
>>
>>128890121
Lush sounds like any baggy-era UK indie, just with cheap watery production. Couldn't write, couldn't sing.
>>
>>128891901
yeah if you're just getting into alternative and indie of any kind for the first time
>>
>>128891919
Ride perfected Baggy
>>
>>128886940

I remember this debate absolutely raging on /mu/ back in 2010.

But now that we're this far removed from the entire Shoegaze scene, and can recognize it was really just a blip on the radar for all reasonably accessible alternative music... Slowdive (and Ride) are honestly pretty boring. What mbv does is far more unique than just reverby indie pop.

mbv absolutely clears them, just by having a bit of a rawer, more original sound.
>>
>>128891956
Name a better reunion album
>>
>>128892008
music like slowdive's is essentially britpop. they should be compared to oasis, verve and pulp, while mbv should be compared to american bands like Dinosaur Jr and Sonic Youth.
>>
>>128892008
They're two different goals, mate. It's not a competition.
>>
>>128892030
shoegaze related? HUM - Inlet
>>
>>128892042
Literally who
>>
>>128892102
newfag
>>
>>128886940
>>
>>128891919
Nobody had better melodies and harmonies than Lush... Nobody.
>>
Both at the same time.
>>
Lush. But between those two, I'll take Loveless over any Slowdive album. Slowdive is perhaps the most consistently "pretty good" band that I've ever heard.
>>
>>128892165
Who doe? Hopefully its not one of those ""american shoegaze"" bands



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.