Was her music good or was she only popular because she was 16 and america was full of pedophiles. Looking back her music was really not that good at all.
yeah
how was i supposed to know
>>128982720>her musicYou mean Max Martin's music?
>>128982837genuinely didnt know this googled this and the dude did backstreet boys thats crazy
>>128982720she didn't write anything on her first few albums - she looked good and her voice had a silly affectation that appealed to grade school girls/future whores
when baby one more time dropped, it was revolutionary, it sounded 10 years ahead of whatever corny shit that was playing at the time.
>>128982720Teeny bopper pop meant to be a mega hit >>128982837this. kudos to max martin's songwriting chops
>>128982720Why is this generation so obsessed with inserting the topic of pedophilia into every conversation? I used to get a kneejerk sense of repulsion at the very concept of it, but the cultural fixation is so pervasive that I'll see thinly-veiled insinuations about it in even the safest of topical jokes everywhere I go on the Internet. At this point it's just kinda desensitizing.
>>128983823hit me baby one more time literally has pedophilic overtones
I was 13 when I saw this slut doing her whoring on TV so if anything she is the pedophile.
>>128983823because the USA is run by pedophiles
>>128983993lol
>>128982720No one even considered Britney to be actual music (as in worthy of critical consideration) until the freebritney shit. It was accurately understood to be radio slop, product. It's not supposed to be good or bad, it just is.
>>128984360however you can assess if one radio slop is better than another. britneys breakthrough was peak slop among slop. it seduced everyone that was listening and watching.
