[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/mu/ - Music


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1765632187987.jpg (100 KB, 908x800)
100 KB
100 KB JPG
Cameron I know you're here from time to time masquerading as either a hater or a shill of your own band, so I implore you to post a picture of your sister! I can only imagine how hot she must be in that vaguely jew-y NYC way
Also you should ditch Geese, the band arrangements are too busy for the songs you write and your solo shit is much better sounding
>>
God is real God is real God is real God is real
>>
>>128983278

This man has insane eyes
>>
let him baskin Geese's success
>>
>>128983304
im not actually kidding this time
>>
>>128983278
talentless neposhit.
>>
>>128983304
Good realization to have, now become a Christian.
>>
>>128984836
don't expect this thread to get much traction (but who knows), so maybe janny will indulge me, but what to your mind is the strongest argument for the validity of the fundamental divine claims of Christianity? I used to consider myself a gaytheist, but I've since become less extreme in my beliefs. but I still struggle with grounding an epistemology. I'm not saying this is actually reality, but if our perception as humans is fundamentally limited, then at some point the foundation of our epistemology would have to be deferred to something we can't claim to fully know. but we aren't omniscient, and again our perception is limited, it's not obvious how we would ever be able to know that it's not limited such that whatever we conclude about reality/divinity/etc. is not merely partial, but necessarily off the mark; that we would never be able to really tell that we don't fundamentally misunderstand reason, logic, necessity, etc. - and this is even getting past solipsism, which I have a hard time getting past as well.
>>
>>128983278
What a nice looking fellow, I wonder what his mother’s thoughts on monogamous relationships are
>>
>>128983986
hi cameron
>>
>>128984971
Stop this right now you utter melt
>>
>>128985090
?
>>
>>128984971
You’re thinking of it in the right way. Consider this: do you think the universe was created with human beings as the main character? If not, why not and consider the implications of this (morality, subjectivity, the possibility of knowledge, metaphysics). Anthropocentrism is the gay academic way to describe it
>>
File: 61rC0xlQupL.jpg (168 KB, 1688x2550)
168 KB
168 KB JPG
Can some anon commit to the bit and really buy this book just to go to one of his shows and try to get him to sign it? Someone mentioned this idea in a past nepogeese thread and it would be really hilarious
>>
>>128985109
You heard me you pig fuck
>>
he's so beautiful
>>
>>128987596
>>
>>128988097
You have no conception



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.