Did you know using AI for making music is literally the same as sampling, since what you do is act as a selector from a bunch of art produce. If youre ok with sampled based music, youre then super ok with AI music, you just dont know yet.
>>128995688 you consciously choose and structure samples in sample-based music. ai requires no effort. how do I keep falling for these clickbait posts?
>>128995688Dear diary, today OP was not a faggot.In fact, today OP was based.
>>128995688The same should apply in both instances. I don’t doubt that it will be incredibly complicated to figure out how royalties should work where an AI uses preexisting copyrighted material to generate its own music, but essential nonetheless.
I've been saying something along the lines of this for a while. The same people that protest AI vehemently are also the same people slapping 4 layers of soundgoodizers on their track without knowing wtf it's actually applying to their music.People are against AI because it is still very rudimentary when it comes to music and most people just use it to push out whole ai slop tracks to either farm streams or bait people. I'm telling you when someone comes out with something like an AI that can properly and professionally master your track and it sounds indistinguishable from a human mastering your track, LITERALLY EVERYONE will be using it.
>>128998518>LITERALLY EVERYONE will be using it.That will never happen, some people are always going to want to do everything themselves.
