>I wished I could save her in >Some sort of time machine.
>trannies when they get misgendered:'(>trannies when they misgender a dead man:))))))))
>>129087687Morality is a spook, dumbass
>>129087707>everything's a spook>but not muh heckin' gender ideology
>>129087731i WANT to follow gender ideology, though, because it's based, unlike your gay rules
Kurt's twitter would've been nothing but DRUMPF posts
>>129087740>i WANT to follow gender ideologyand most people WANT to follow standard gender norms: so what?
>>129087781Well, morality being a spook won't stop me from weaponizing it against the masses. Kek
>>129087787then you can't in good faith complain when people use it against you
>>129087801It's all a matter of who has the better psy-weapons. It may be you for now, but the troonlab is working tirelessly to keep up
>>129087824>the troonlab is working tirelessly to keep upno it's not. they're further handicapping themselves with drugs and other addictions. they've fallen out of public favor - whatever favor they had - and it's only getting worse.
>>129087864people just need a little taste of that sweet, sweet freedom. once they get a taste they're intoxicated and can't resist going all the way
>>129087779Based KurtI've been dobbing all my troon friends into ICE as illegal immigrants>mfw they get blown away
>>129087707I'm sure that's what you tell yourself when you're sodomizing children. come within ten feet of my son and I blow your fucking head off freak.
>>129087921So violent...
>>129087898gender ideology is strict in its own way. most people have certain ideals about men and women (e.g., "a 'real' man wouldn't do that", "that's not ladylike") but don't say not adhering to these ideals makes you the opposite or something else; whereas it often does in gender ideology. there are those who try to have it both ways, saying "adhering to these stereotypes makes me a woman, but a woman need not adhere to them to be a woman" which is just its own kind of incoherence. and incoherence is not only not freeing, but can be quite internally disruptive.
>>129087949Does that turn you on?
>>129087548I need men in my anus
>>129087960it's really not that complicated though. "i want to be a cute girl" are the kinds of thoughts that motivate troons, it's not like "i want to conform to XYZ version of gender ideology as defined by the DBF committee" or some shit like that, it's literally all improvised on the spot>>129087962yeah, you wanna take this somewhere else uwu
>>129087982>it's literally all improvised on the spotit's not. you're not going to see a male saying "I want to be a cute girl" and then rocking a quiff, a Hawaiian shirt, and kakis in order to achieve that goal: they're going to adhere to stereotypes. they have different justifications for their self-id, but it either revolves around social stereotypes or biological stereotypes (namely "brain matter"). which make sense to an extent, otherwise you're saying "I'm a woman" and there's nothing meaningfully alike with them that differentiates you from a man.
>>129088050Identities are fuzzy, they aren't clearly defined rules, think of it like one of those 3d point graphs where some of the points are in the very middle while others are really far away and then imagine this same graph but in like 500 dimensions. nobody is writing this shit down
>>129087548Kurdt was a beautiful woman
>>129088063you're retarded.
>>129088092right back at 'cha, my man
>>129088063>Identities are fuzzy, they aren't clearly defined rulesI'm not saying it's there's no nuance to definitions, but the vast majority of people the vast majority of the time have an implicit understanding of what it means to be a man or a woman. it's only in the last ~10-15 years modern gender ideology started to find academic and medical/institutional favor and started to catch on with a larger number of people (a disproportionate number of whom are autistic and naturally are more strict about labels). but none of that negates gender ideology being ironically strict (and incoherent) in its own way.
>>129087707>fag wanders in from /pol/>ruins everythingMany such cases.
>>129088139That's just because most people are too weak to decide "hmm this is attractive to me" or not so they need some fag guidelines to make the decision for them
>>129088191>they need some fag guidelines to make the decision for themI don't agree with that characterization. to transgender people's credit, while there are certain sectors of society which applaud being trans (especially openly/loudly), in many cases it's not - but that's what feels right to them. but as they conceptualize it/justify it verbally, they say that they're "being a man/woman" or whatever. but even claiming gender non-conformity and saying "I don't label myself this or that, I'm just wearing this because I find it attractive" is still implicitly marking out what it means to be a man or a woman. otherwise you wouldn't be able to say you aren't those things.
>>129087779We dont know that. The world has changed a lot since he passed
>>129087980Don't we all
