Its insane how these are the only two bands in existence to stay relevant with all generations
>>129151692Are Beatles still relevant? I honestly don't know.It should be the Doors.But you're right about Nirvana.
>>129151706>the DoorsThe Doors weren't even relevant with Gen X. They were exclusively only popular with Boomers
>>129151718 That Doors movie did a lot for Gen X. And Gen X had some of Jim's best clones. Danzig, Nick Cave, David Gahan. I mean, they were boomers, but popular at the time.
>>129151706I introduced the Beatles to my zoomer brothers and now they love them more than I do. They went deep into the solo discographies even, which I never bothered with.
>>129151692no one cares about nirvana anymore. you live in delusion
>>129151706the Beatles get 50 times more plays on Spotify than the Doors.
>>129151765Yeah okay
It's better to be a band that wasnt seen as relevant outside of its home country but is now more relevant than ever before and still growing and is actually less dated than either of the bands you listed.
>>129151888Only Mexico knows his true genius.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e8EscNURoNcAlso, partly a Jim clone himself. But gentler and whinier.
>>129151765no
>>129151692nobody past gen-x cares about the beatles.
>>129151888pic unrelated?
>>129151692I can imagine that The Beatles are relevant if they basically are your introduction to music. But if you've already listened to a lot of 70s, 80s and 90s music before diving into their discography it feels very dated in comparison to anything that came after them.
>>129153585There hits kind of still stand the test of time
>>129153625That is certainly an opinion.
>>129151692What about Pink Floyd and Queen?
>>129151692>m-my boyband is still popular, right?please stay in >>129141333 or /wpop/ or lgbt to prevent spam, thank you!
>>129151718>>129151738the doors were bigger in the 80's and 90's than when they were active, because of apocalypse now and biopic.
>>129153750Hang yourself
>>129153750kill yourself
>>129151692literally who?
and these aura-farming tryhards are...?
>>129153379>nobody past gen-x cares about the beatles.nah millennials loved them (their commercial peak was in the early 2000s), zoomers don't care though and can't name any of their songs
>>129153742>Pink Floydthey kinda fell off with zoomers, pre-late 70s music in general is going extinct culturally
Black Sabbath as well. Plenty of younger kids recognized Ozzy when he passed.Other 90s bands Sublime and especially RHCP.>>129153742Queen is also definitely still relevant.
>>129151888Based and trips of truth. Nirvana and the Beatles suck shit and you fags need to get over both of them already.
>>129155972>their commercial peak was in the early 2000sbecause they released a greatest hits album which they never did before and boomers bought it up by the boatload.
>>129151692Tom Petty said it: Nirvana will become the next Beatles in the history of rock
>>129151806Are Martins the GOAT acoustics? I've played most of the prestige brands and I think they're best but IDK. Ovation wins points for its unique sound, but still.
>>129153750He fears his royalty checks will shrink. He's an Ono, not a Lennon.
