What the fuck did I just listen to?
>>129262109Well....Now you're on the list.good goin anon.
>>129262109if the picture is anything to go by, you just listened to Buyer's Market
From what I understand, Sotos' work is a criticism of how media exploits victims of crime and abuse. He's saying "oh, you morbidly enjoy watching true crime shows? Here, let me shove your face into the deepest pits of human suffering and see how that makes you feel"I'm pretty sure he actually is just a freak who's into child abuse but that's the justification he uses for his work.
>Here, let me shove your face into the deepest pits of human suffering and see how that makes you feel
>>129262109it's breddy gud, very evocative and disturbing.are any of the other sütcliffe albums worth a damn? there's just so many.
>>129262109Literally not music>>129262181I wish I could find the quote about a hypothetical of your child being molested or raped, and I swear he was jerking off as he was writing it
>>129262109He looks like he would post on /r9k/ /b/ /lit/ and /mu/
>>129266854Sotos has written short stories that are little more than vivid descriptions of child rape and murder told by a narrator who totally isn't a self insert.
>>129266963Yet he's written plenty of nonce shit
Is this the actual album pseudo$corpion is based off of?
>>129262109Interview recordings of people talking about their damaged existences, except there's no music in it. So I don't know why it's considered music.
>>129267164It's not music at all
>>129267166It's considered as an 'album', though.
>>129267172Sure, an album is just a collection of audio recordings in the end. But that doesn't qualify it as music. It's just recordings of abuse victims
>>129267205I understand and agree with you.
>>129267205You're just recordings of abuse victims
>>129262109it's cathartic.
>>129267270nah its creepy,
>>129262109Asceticists 2006, the Whitehouse album Bennett and Best made after they were sick of Sotos' shit is quite possibly their best album, has at least two tracks that are commonly thought to be direct disses at Sotos, listen to it if you haven't alreadyhttps://youtu.be/tK-MclL_1WY
>>129268012Why were they sick of Sotos? How did they diss him?
>>129268040They said what everyone else had already said for 20 years. That Sotos' art is just a thin veil to excuse his actual pedophilia abd sadism
>>129268040The thread about Sotos is still up there on WB's label forumhttps://susanlawly.proboards.com/thread/668/obvious-sotos-question>Sotos? What an unbelievable fantasist - his fiction is always full of it.>It's not a question of not mentioning the most real truth of desperately buying time, like Dworkin and the cakes she didn't talk about; and it's not even that of being a geeky heterosexual conservative in denial - it's not even understanding the difference between hangdog vanity and being a fucking liar. It's prurience dressed up as empathy; it's not being able to help yourself: it's numbered books and loose change.
>>129267270>>129267358one does not exclude the other
>>129267205thats a genre called ‘Spoken Word’ youre describing
>>129268131i dont get it...
>>129268131It's always so funny that Bennet's forum writing style is the same as his lyrics. The funnier thing is that you can find a panel featuring him and there he's just a normal british dude talking about how he got into experimental music from Yoko Ono records.>>129270567Main thing I'm taking away is>It's prurience dressed up as empathyMeaning he just constantly lied to himself and everyone else that his works had some greater purpose than just getting sick kicks out of discussing pedophilia.
>>129270567He's stating that Sotos is a perv/degenerate and that his "album" is faux-art-shlock.
>>129262181There's no way this nigga isn't a fucking pedo. No one wants to hear or read about this except sick fucks.
