[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/mu/ - Music


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1999.png (515 KB, 960x960)
515 KB
515 KB PNG
Completely serious question: can you think of a single song from this century that would look weird and out of place at the end of the past one?
Like how music from the 50's would sound insane to someone from the 30's, or you could never find something that sounded like the 80's in the early 70's.
>>
>>129270322
https://youtu.be/Ez2EAhAAfIY?si=1SJVdp_ZzYBCSZMv

I choose this for my pick
>>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6yLQRF-cEU
>>
>>129270322
https://youtu.be/vJTYmu8-r6U?si=h1PiRX27kI7DSf9x
>>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QF32LqGizCs
>>
>>129270322
just to understand you, it sounds like you're talking more about advancements in production techniques and technology than anything cultural?
>>
>>129270322
No.
Absolutely anything in the past 31-32 years is stagnant.
>>
1999 songs don't sound like anything recent and why would they?
>>
>>129270322
Yeah, that for example: https://youtu.be/T4IdJfHH0Yg



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.