Why pitchfork don’t review Jacob collier?
>>129407350>why trash dont review poopa mistery
because even they aren't that retardedthough to be fair they know nothing of theory and you probably need to in order to discuss that spazz
>>129407350He has no identity, that’s it.
>>129407350"why doesn't pitchfork review" is how you say it
>>129407400They can’t even review him once just to say that? I like his latest album, it’s just guitar. I never liked any of his stuff before except hideaway live performance.
>>129407411braindamaged retard
>>129407418Don’t get me wrong, I was parroting all this shit >>129407425 but I just heard his latest album, it came out last year sometime but I only just now listened to it cos I saw picrel video. It’s just him + guitar. When I say “I like his latest album” I mean like 2 songs on it + his cover of Norwegian wood.
>>129407350>pitchforkis it 2009?
>>129407462so after 10 albums he's come up with 2 listenable original songs?the other anon was right bruh
>>129407498Maybe, but you have to keep in mind that only 10 or so good songs come out each year. I’m saying collier might actually have one of the 10 (for 2025).
>>129407498he had a couple before that, people just talk about the meme shit.it's not what won him grammys.
>>129407462If you like two songs on an album, that's a 5/10 at best
>>129407350Lemme give analogies for this question across other mediums:>Why doesn't a food critic review a glass of water? >Why doesn't a painter review the color grey? >Why doesn't a TV writer review the static you get between channels? That's pretty much what your question is. Does that make sense?
>>129407942No
>>129407498>>129407917>>129407942Bros this is the song I like from the album, what do you think?::https://youtu.be/8lnxgf1e0jI?si=sMNGZ-V37p-rjNoq
>>129407716nta but i heard his main albums too and they're fucking dogshit