your not going to die from having a millisecond of audio loss, just listen to the damn music
Lossless only makes a difference if you listen to bands that are playing real instruments, and if you care about the health of your ears.
>millisecond of audio losswhat could this retarded faggot possibly mean by this?
>>129480864i think people value lossless more for the philosophical thing of having your data be as pristine as possible, maybe the digital equivalent of a master disc for pressing vynil or some shitbesides you can use the lossless version for reencoding to whatever format you're actually going to listen to whether opus or 320 kbps mp3 or whatever and you don't run the risk of losing any information over iterated encodesi don't truly think anyone who knows any better is storing thousands of flacs in their smartphone to listen on the go
>>129480864time is precious, you're dying.why experience "good enough" when you should be experiencing "best possible"
>>129480864>having a millisecond of audio losskek you dont even know what lossless means you fucking sploob
>>129480905you're a retard who fell for the bait
