>>129481597
>he listens to music for fun
Yikes my dude

>>129481597
So the mere criticism of 'boring' is reddit now?
What word do you use when you find an album uninteresting or bland? Because I'd call it unlikely if not impossible you've NEVER found an album boring.

>>129481770
no, it's worse than reddit. "boring" is never specific enough to describe any shortcomings of any artform; it is entirely subjective and non-descrictive, and most of the time just outs you as failing to engage with something out of your own problems (such as ADHD)
use actual musical terminology. say it lacks enough changes in instrumentation, that the main melody falls too often on the beat, anything like that. just talk in an objective manner.

>>129481826
>it is entirely subjective
Congratulations: you found the point of reviews and album discussion. Subjective opinions.
>objective
I'm not gonna talk about a subjective art form in an objective terminology unless absolutely necessary.

>>129481859
>reviews and album discussion
Wait, so Pitchfork is good now?
Which one is it? I thought Pitchfork = Bad!

>>129481826
>use actual musical terminology
if you criticize music on purely subjective grounds you will be called tasteless or retarded and if you try to affect some form of objectivity you will be called a pseud
that's how it works on these parts. don't bother, it's always a losing battle

Who even asked you, cherri pie?

this thread is boring

>>129481597
which favourite song of yours got called boring?

>>129481894
>so Pitchfork is good now?
When did I bring up Pitchfork at any point? I never did that. Pitchfork is irrelevant to this conversation.
Is the implication that Pitchfork is the ONLY format that music and album discussion exists?

>>129481939
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sNJmfuEWR8w

>>129481597
Go back and research a bit more. Come back in 100 years please.