.
>>12956401560s Zayn and 60s Louis Tomlinson about to ascend the Starry Ladders up in this bitch!
>>129564015they are so heckin wholesome and wacky! love these guys!
>>129564104Kill yourself
>>129564015Whom was the better drummer?
>>129566200that's Paul and John(both of whom were better than Ringo at drumming)
>>129564015Just lads being lads
>>129568250Look again (perhaps with your spectacles on). Also, citation needed on John's drumming.
>>129564104The Beatles are often considered the "original" or "prototype" boy band due to their massive, screaming teenage girl fan base, matching suits, and early pop hits, especially during the height of Beatlemania. However, they differ fundamentally from traditional boy bands because they were an organic group, wrote their own music, played their own instruments, and matured into artists, rather than being a manufactured product.Key Arguments for and Against:Arguments for "Boy Band":Beatlemania: Their early 1960s image featured intense, frenzied reactions from young female fans.Marketing: They had matching haircuts and mop-top suits.Arguments Against "Boy Band":Creative Control: They wrote their own material, unlike typical manufactured boy bands.Instrumentation: They played their own instruments and were a functioning band for years before fame.Evolution: They quickly evolved beyond simple love songs into complex, artistic music (e.g.Rubber Soul**Revolver).Conclusion: The Beatles were a pop-rock band that, for a brief periodfunctioned as a boy band in terms of marketing and audience reaction, but they were not manufactured as one. They are often described as the template for later, more manufactured groups.Boybandfag BTFO as usual. KWAB
>>129574173stop posting this shit
>>129564015I used to do this all the time
>>129575763stop crying in every beatles thread and he wouldn't have to
>>129575763Hi boybandfag. Are you crying? Does it hurt?
>>129564015their movies are going to suck, aren't they?
>>129578243Yes, just like my BF does while we listen to the Beatles (we're both gay)
>>129575763go back to /shugazi/
>>129574173Thanks AIslop, let me just say that I actually agree with the sentiment that they were a “proto boy band” up until they stopped playing live which I think was was what? 1966, that checks out since that’s around the time their music actually started to get good. They were all too old to be considered boy band material at that point too, their youngest member was 23 and I’m sure even 21 is considered old as fuck in boy bands.
