>buy expensive new headphones>only marginally better than my $100 Audio Technica m40x I bought a decade agoaudiophiles are jokes
>buy expensive new headphoneslmao
>>129589951>$100 a decade agoAnon, that's like $500 today.
In every hobby or interest there's always the type of person who will buy the most expensive thing10k for a race bike or golf clubsor they guy who pays 10 dollars for a craft beer
>what is inflation?All electronics are more expensive today, not just headphones.
>>129590010Yeah speakers are way better than headphones obviously but many have neighbours around, my neighbour is a passive aggressive bitch who starts slamming her doors if I listen to my speakers at a high enough volume
>>129589951I liked my M40xes... Shame the hinge wentGot some Sennheisers now, HD 598 CS
>>129589951Are you using an amp or just plugging expensive cans into your laptop?
>>129591364thisi always rec people at least get a dongle first to see what their equipment can do if they're hesitant in buying a stack straight ahead
reminder that studio headphones are terrible for music listening unless you put a heavy eq on them
>>129591586>headphones designed to be neutral arent flavored damn who woulda thought
>>129591586i listen to all my songs through flat response headphones. if your mix sucks listening with true dynamic range, then you need to lrn2mix
>>129591696some people are clueless though. they see dt770s everywhere and buy them for casual purposes without even using EQs>>129591719it's more fun to use 35$ sony headphones than neutral studio headphones, you're lying to yourself
>>129591719>flat response headphonesno such a thing exist, a headphones can't physically reproduce low frequencies in a flat way
