>Your morality is not defined by a dollar amount. And if so, what is that dollar amount? When does it start? If it’s a cutoff like 'all millionaires are bad,' at 999,000 I’m good? It can’t be that way. It doesn’t make any sense. I got successful the hard way, in spite of the way the system is set up. Everything was against me. My talent pushed against all the headwinds and I got successful that way. And with that success, I’ve done things with my reach that I wanted to do that was helpful for a lot of people. And I think that’s most important — the things you believe in, the things you align with. Because a person with more money can do more good. It’s a choice. Again, we’re living in the real world. You can be realistic or idealistic. This is the system that we have. And with the system that we have, what are you going to do?
>>129776567How did he pull Beyonce?
>>129776567>Your morality is not defined by a dollar amount. And if so, what is that dollar amount? When does it start? If it’s a cutoff like 'all millionaires are bad,' at 999,000 I’m good?That's a completely fair point though. The 'eat the rich' idiots are really vague where the cutoff is. Does a person magically become evil after a certain net worth? What's the networth cutoff if so? It's a valid question for people who hold that belief, and if they stand by it, it should be easy to answer, right? So go ahead: what's the cutoff? What net worth does a person become evil?
>>129776567On one hand, he's totally rightOn the other, he's still a terrible musician and his hair disgusts me
>When does it start? If it’s a cutoff like 'all millionaires are bad,' at 999,000 I’m good?When does it make you a good person? The whole reasoning is asinine. If you hoard vast amounts of wealth it says more about you than about poor people.
>>129776945>When does it make you a good person?It doesn't. Actions make good / bad people. Not net worth. It's a very simple question. What net worth does someone become evil if that's a factor in deciding whether or not someone's a good person.
>>129776621I want to kill all millionaires/billionaires because I'm an envious spiteful prick and I own that.
>>129776966>hoard wealth>live luxurious life>pretentious, vain appearance obsession wearing Gucci, Prada and assorted status symbols>donate symbolic sums of money to feign interest in fighting poverty, urban decay etc>WHY CAN'T I HAVE MY TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS, GUISE?!?!??!!!11
>>129777029You have dodged the question twice. You are saying that hoarding wealth is evil, right? So how much wealth is allowed? What is the amount of wealth someone can own before they're inherently evil? Surely there's a cutoff.>>129777026Now YOU I admire just for the honesty.
>>129777163>So how much wealth is allowed?The fact that you need a specific value is pure sophistry. When does poverty become something you have to solve yourself? At what point should you stop caring abour others? What anount of poverty is worthy of helping and when does it become your own fault?Supreme autism.
>>129776567>in spite of the way the system is set upThe sad thing is, he believes it. Don't we all hold on to certain beliefs to makr it through, when we know deep down that capitalism is the source of our fears ans troubles?
>>129776621>are really vague where the cutoff isMaybe because you're focusing on the face-value of the slogan, you dumbass??
>>129776966>Actions make good / bad people. Not net worth.>People kill people. Not guns.>Don't blame the church. Blame the individual priests.
>>129776589The gaslighting she and the media have done to present her as this STRONG WOMAN after he cheated is incredible
People love to point the finger and generalize all their issues on someone or something else, the issue is these same people never have any real solutions or plans for after their violent takeover.
Kek poorfags destroyed
>>129776567that nigga has the ugliest chompers i ever seen
>>129776621>Does a person magically become evil after a certain net worth?I think the point is that you can't become that rich (billions) through honest means. You literally have to charge more than a product is worth in cost to get such profits and you have to do it on a large scale. Ripping millions of people off for $3 each is still theft. Granted that's the only way to do it in the reality we live in but that's only because there's literal guns pointed to everyone's heads to accept it or die off.
>>129777392>You literally have to charge more than a product is worth in cost to get such profits and you have to do it on a large scale.And not only this, you have to underpay the worker in many cases. None of this is necessary for everyone to live a decent life. I can't explain it well but I'd suggest reading Proudhon's book on property.
>>129777211Those are all valid questions and you're just using them to dodge answering yet-a-fucking-gain. >>129777302Because the people using the slogan are often being very literal with it and hate all rich people. I have friends who hold this belief. Trust me, they're JUST as literal about the meaning of it.
>>129777514>Those are all valid questionsAnd you can't answer them because you autistically obsess over how much wealth you can hoard.
He is an ugly ass nigga and gave Beyonce some hideous children
>>129776589illuminati cia magic
>>129777570So you can dodge my question [three times now] but I have to answer yours instantly? Yeah okay.
>>129777392Not to mention the insider trading, organized crime syndicates, overseas accounts, and sex trafficking 99% of these rich people do. I’m sure there’s even more
>>129777703Works both ways. The fact that you even have to get a specific value for wealth is indicative of how much you need a new car, house, expensive clothes and luxury in your life. You're not going to hoard wealth and then give it to charity, right? Exactly.
>>129776567>became famous because of the system>im against the systemfaggot nig
>>129776567>>Your morality is not defined by a dollar amount. And if so, what is that dollar amount? When does it start? If it’s a cutoff like 'all millionaires are bad,' at 999,000 I’m good? It can’t be that way.Hate him or not but you know he's right
>>129776567He's not wrong but that doesn't mean other billionaires are moral people, and I don't like how in his music he constantly brags about how much money he has or what he owns, but justifies that with the idea that anyone can reach his level if you follow the same path he did
>>129776567Beyonce loves him because he is one of those get along guys. When she wanted him to be some Black Excellence Totem he was like sure I'll gladly grow out an afro and wear gold shorts. All most of the billionaire women want is their man to be a subservient that appears in the manner she wants to make herself feel like a powerful family, which pumps up her ego. Taylor Swift met Kelce and he had to wear some goofy clothes and couldn't retire either. He is currently 35 trying to be a Tight End which usually retires by 32 because the position is so brutal because Taylor wants him to be her Football Husband.>>129776621I think evil is only when you take so much and don't give it back. Anyone who pays 0 taxes, with 30 billion in the bank is evil. Greed is evil but not merely having money.
>>129777776deserved missed digits
I GOT NINETY-NINE PROBLEMS AND THEY ALL BITCHES
>>129777392>charge more than a product is worth in costAh, but it is an honest deal between the capitalist and society; he only distributes the salaries he paid to all items produced, regardless of the fact that the salaries aren't tied to the production but to the living means of the labourer. Ergo, the more he produces, the lower the price of each individual item every time he increases output.
>>129777703He is pointing out that your questions are sophistry
>>129777302/thread a reminder a lot of the autists that post here are retards
>>129777392>You literally have to charge more than a product is worth in costEvery single business, large or small, honest or evil, does this. It's called the profit motive and if they didn't do that they'd go out of business.
>>129776567>This is the system that we have.what a strange lack of imagination for a creative person like him, it's almost as if being a billionaire rots your brain
>>129776589she was 15, wasn't she? his story is full of holes
>>129776567"he's so close to bankruptcy he was signing cheques with Beyonce's name a few months ago"
>>129780798I think the nigga might be gay, I fear.
>>129780798Were you expecting him to invent a new category of economics from scratch or something? Just because he's rich and at least somewhat intelligent doesn't mean he's qualified do literally anything. If anything, we'd all be better off if more of these ultra-rich fucks (like Bill Gates, for example) had Jay's mindset, sticking to what they know instead of trying to meddle with shit they barely understand.
>>129776589grooming
>>129776589he was told to go for beyonce because it would be better for his brand and future. he wanted to marry Kelis and they were dating, but she had no corporate future. he originally wanted to marry Aliyah but she was obviously killed. but he got sat down and told that marrying kelis meant he would not be allowed into the club. he'd just be a rapper. beyonce was corporate.
He is absolutely correct and at least very consistent. Him being black and stoic about this makes both chuds and leftards seethe.
>>129783335>he originally wanted to marry AliyahImagine getting R Kelly's sloppy seconds. Big yikes there Hov
>>129776567Not music. Get this sofa lips away from my screen.
