>just found out the beatles invented heavy metalWtf is there anything these genuses couldnt do?
>>129797282be heterosexual/make good music, of course!
>>129797282Put aside their petty, jewish money grubbing to stay in a band with their best friends
>>129797282I can't believe 60s Mozart were able to do this. Truly masters of their craft. This is why /mu/ has always loved The Beatles
>>129797282Beatles invented 60% of modern music, maybe even more. They invented or popularized half of the recording techniques too.
>>129797304John and Paul buried the hatchet before John died
zayn hurr one direction hurr durr errr 4chan used to hate the bootles urrrr
>>129797308>>129797313I somehow agree with both of these statements about the Beatles. I'm also gay, but I'm not sure if this is relevant.
>>129797329John Lennon jerked off Brian Epstein. Your experience is relevant my friend.
>>129797347HOT!
>>129797282Be my friend
>>129797282I can't believe 60s BTS were able to do this awful gay gimmick, truly scavengers of trash, this is why/mu/ always shat on the Beatles. The Beatles invented about 60% of modern faggotry, maybe more, they popularized half of gay sex positions too.
>>129797307>>129797308Samefag and it's samefagging ways, doest your mccartney-lennon body pillow stand on its own now?, that you've made it all crusty with your 200th ejaculation ?
>>129797546You're a seething retard
>>129797299Wow what a witty response. I laughed reading this anon
>>129797546Lay off the porn coomer
>>129797546Most hinged Beatle hater
>>129797552Using both anonymous and standard tabs I see... you can't fool me you fag.
>>129797565Meds
>>129797575You need retroviral ones, to treat your HIV, boy band lover fag.
Maybe i need to take my meds, but i’m convinced that boybandfag is making these threads himself, so that he can samefag it up in the replies when there is no new beatles threads in the catalog for him to reply to.
>>129797597Why are you so homophobic?
>>129797597I bet you like The Rolling Stones, hypocrite
>>129797607I was going to say that this would be way too much effort for just a few shitposts but now that I think about it, it's kind of insane how this guy seemingly stalks every new beatles thread that shows up in the catalog to shitpost in it.
>>129797656Does anyone report his posts?
>>129797664for what? He's not really breaking any rules
>>129797675I mean, avatar fagging, spamming.
>>129797680it's a jannies playground don't you know?
>>129797801I mean, there's no reason for them to let him get away with this for half a decade.
>>129797282Less influential than Skrillex, btw.
>>129797931Forced meme
Brian Wilson invented shoegazehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RO_LX-m74uw&list=RDRO_LX-m74uw
>>129797502you sound like a fag
>>129797974Mike Love invented Gay hats
>>129797974Thats actually a dream pop song and the beatles invented shoegaze years earlier anyway: https://youtu.be/2zc3idF_IZ0?si=GDvJl3HSKp29imwo
>>129797609No response of course
>>129797308Name one (1) recording technique **invented** by The Beatles
>>129799427I feel fine is one of the first songs to intentionally use guitar feedback, does that count?
>>129799427flanging>inb4 les paulyeah I read the wiki too, beatles OBVIOUSLY deserve some credit at least
>>129800300Truke
>>129800277You acknowledge yourself they may have been "one of the first", so they invented nothing>>129800300>flangingCome on now lol. Stick to a potentially successful argument about them popularizing techniques, crediting them with inventions is a delusional exaggeration
>>129800717>Come on now lollook it up dude
Paul McCartney raped my niece in 1967
>>129797900true, in a just world he would be permabanned or even rangebanned but jannies like picrel don't care>inb4 3 dayagain by posting his fugly cheese huffing face it will lead to either>him not seeing this thread at all>he does see this thread and gives me a 3 day day while completey ignoring boybandfag
>>129800732googled 1967 paul, lucky bitch
>>129800277>I feel fine is one of the first songs to intentionally use guitar feedbackthis is wrong, however, you could make the claim that its the first in popular musicwhich is something I have read. but its not that big of a deal
>>129797502>they popularized half of gay sex positions too.lol ok you're funnier than the boy band guy, he's just tediousyou should leave that schtick to him and stick to your strengths
>>129799427bouncing tracks
>>129797282There needs to be a modern equivalent to the Beatles. Just 4 madlads pumping out kino in various genres for 7 years straight.
>>129800277The Beatles got big by being 'thing, Britain :o' while doing American rock music in a time when this worked on young women over a mass-marketing campaign, then pivoted to psychedelic music where they were also not pioneers but just 'one of the best' in retrospect. They invented nothing.
>>129802161alright thats a new one for me>Ping-pong recording (also called ping-ponging, bouncing tracks, or reduction mixing) is a method of sound recording. It involves combining multiple track stems into one, allowing more room for overdubbing when using tape recorders with a limited set of tracks. It is also used to simplify mixdowns.when was the first instance of the beatles doing that? I'll keep that in mind if I ever find an earlier one>They invented nothing.they did invent one thing... modern marketing
>>129799427ADT was one of George Martins tricks but I think it came out of John nagging him about having to sing a song twice.Didn't they do something akin to digital distortion somehow? Can't remember the context but it came off the back of John and Paul fucking around on the mixing console on guitar tracks. Distortion wasn't added this way prior to them doing it.I think they also had a lot to do with gated reverb but it wasn't called that when they did it.
>>129802193>when was the first instance of the beatles doing that? I'll keep that in mind if I ever find an earlier oneThey did that from Rubber Soul onwards regularly but I think some of their earlier singles had it due to them overdubbing lead lines and backing vocals
>>129797299why do you have a picture of a man you think is gay saved on your device?
>>129802226where was that digital distortion added? revolution 9?
>>129799427I don't know if they were necessarily the first but they were using close micing on the drums before anyone else was. Like there's images from 1965 of Ringo's kit mic'd up with the snare, kick and overhead all recorded separately. Before this drums were recorded with two mics set away from the kit to capture the whole drum sound.
>>129799427DI bass to provide a proper thicc tone and attack.
>>129802248I'd need to try and find the book, but I think it was around 1968? Would that be in the realm of Revolution's single mix?
>>129802165BTS
>>129802226Vocal distortion as a creative tool was used from 1965 onwards by them, I think it first appears in Paperback Writer as a subtle effect on the backing vocals, but John went hard on it in Tomorrow Never Knows. In general, it's hard to unpack what they gleaned from Martin who may have taken it from his own memory of the techniques and what the Beatles dreamed up in the studio. I suppose the concept of "The Studio is also an instrument" was something they were the first to really encapsule. Most musicians turned up to record live takes and tweaked them with overdubs prior to the Beatles taking their time from Rubber Soul
>>129799427Varispeed.
>>129802288>Vocal distortion as a creative tool was used from 1965 onwards by themsure but"Joe Meek & The Blue Men – I Hear A New World" pretty sure already had that on the first song, among other studio techniquesrecorded in 1959https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NamRwHlBiSY
>>129802318Do you think the Beatles were stealing ideas from this guy or something? I'm not understanding what you're trying to say beyond 2 groups reached the same conclusion under separate scenarios
>>129802387>I'm not understanding what you're trying to say beyond 2 groups reached the same conclusion under separate scenariosthats exactly what I was trying to sayalso Joe Meek is a producer, not a group
>>129800717>>129802139Post an example of a band intentionally using guitar feedback prior to 1964. Maybe someone else did it first but I still haven't heard it yet>>129802173Whether or not they were actually the very first to do something the fact remains the same that the beatles were inventive in the studio, massively influential, and essential in the development and popularization of the psychedelic sound among many other things and we would all be much worse off without them than with
>>129802807>Post an example of a band intentionally using guitar feedback prior to 1964rolling stones - stoned 1963https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pZ-jXKLA_wU>>129802807>Whether or not they were actually the very first to do something the fact remains the same that the beatles were inventive in the studio, massively influential, and essential in the development and popularization of the psychedelic sound among many other things and we would all be much worse off without them than withyes, I agree
Ozzy invente metal, retard
>>129802807>the beatles were inventive in the studioI've yet to see a single convincing example of this ITT or elsewhere. And it's always subtly implied that it was one of the Beatles who would have done this and not one of their fifth men or just an audio engineer they hired.>we would all be much worse off without themPop rock music would miss some specific bangers but that's it, really.
>>129802846>OzzyThe talentless hack who couldn't play an instrument or write a song? Or did you mean Tony and Geezer? Anyways, The Beatles did it first with Helter Skelter. And if you use the excuse that that song was not dark enough, then listen to I Want You (She's Heavy). Black Sabbath CONTRIBUTED greatly to heavy metal by adding horror elements to it, that I'll acknowledge. But even their first album wasn't 100% horror themed like some people want us to believe. The Beatles did it first.
>>129805043Helter Skelter wasnt the firstmaybe one of the first 10
>>129802862>I've yet to see a single convincing example of this ITT or elsewhereThis should be self evident if you listen to their records and you know your history, they were very clearly a notch or two above a majority of their competition; they took more risks, their sound was more varied and their albums more accomplished than anyone else making pop music at the time and they helped opene the floodgates for other groups to be more inventive with their records.>Pop rock music would miss some specific bangers but that's it, reallyI think you greatly underestimate the influence their music had on everyone around them and everyone in proceeding generations but okay bro >>129802846Ozzy is on record saying black sabbath never would have happened if the beatles never existed
>>129797299fpwp
>>129800727>attributing innovations of Ken Townsend and George Martin to the beatles because the beatles hired themThe beatles were barely involved in the production side of their music, even at the tail end of their careers, so giving them credit for inventing production techniques is retarded at face value. You're just wording your claims sloppily, exaggerating, and giving the beater boys credit for things they didn't do
>>129799427Lmao u lose
>>129806331Shut up
>>129797299Fpbp /thread
