which one does /mu/ prefer
>>129808680HoLV has higher highs, but BBK is the better album. both are basically flawless though
Blue Bell for Carolyn's Fingers alone. Pure angelic beauty.
>>129808745what are the higher highs you speak of, personally I think >>129808777is the highest high of either, also check myself out I got heaven trips talking about angelic beauty
>>129808777same opinion but for me it's Suckling the Mender
>>129808680the peel sessions
>>129808680BBK is their most consistent album IMO. I would say it doesn't hit the highs of their other more revered albums but athol-brose might be the best song they made. For those reasons, BBK is my favorite CT album.
>>129808777Idk about the yahahahaaaaa
>>129715930>>129715930>>129715930but really probably blue bell knoll just slightly
HoLV for consistency. Too much of BBK feels like proto-FCC to me, but the great songs are arguably better than HoLV.
>>129808745fpbpI might like BBK better but HoLV gets points for being more accessible, it's "the classic" to most people, I've heard those songs getting fucked up at parties forever and they're ingrained in my brain for life
>>129808680Bbk easily. Holv is main stream trash
Victorialand
>>129811115This, Treasure and Head Over Heels are their best three albums. Blue Bell Knoll is good with a couple of really nice tracks. Heaven or Las Vegas is the Cocteau Twins album for people who don't really like the Cocteau Twins.
