[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/mu/ - Music


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: WtBts BtsFSl AHDsNt.jpg (1.53 MB, 3391x1080)
1.53 MB
1.53 MB JPG
These last few days, I've been listening to the Beatles' discography. Whenever it's time to revisit Beatles for Sale, I feel kind of bummed out, just because it's sandwiched between A Hard Day's Night and Help!, two albums I hold in higher regard.
I've heard that a couple of people feel the same way. So, I was wondering: If Beatles for Sale had been released between With the Beatles and A Hard Day's Night, for example, would it be held in higher regard simply because it wouldn't represent a decline in quality between two superior albums?
Can you think of any other discographies where changing the release dates of a few albums would improve the listening experience?
>>
File: beatles poster headspace.jpg (1.21 MB, 4096x2730)
1.21 MB
1.21 MB JPG
>>129848830
>60s boyband autism
seek employment, this isn't good for you
>>
>>129848834
I am employed, but my question isn't about The Beatles specifically. Read the thread titled.
>>
>>129848841
Dude sees red everytime he sees the Beatles mentioned
>>
>>129848863
I hate to derail the thread, but what is it with him? In every single Beatles thread, he's there.
>>
>>129848883
Dude has been at this for half a decade now
>>
>>129848901
And he never elaborated why he hates The Beatles?
>>
>>129848883
4chan is full of schitzo lunatics
>>
>>129848913
Not once
>>
>>129848916
Maybe he's a troll.
>>
>>129848830
Matter less than the correct placement of condoms by your homo partner, so you won't get aids.
>>
>>129848939
I'm not gay and I don't have a partner, so I don't use condoms.
Jesus fucking Christ. Are people seriously ignore the question of the thread just because they dislike the band I used as an example?
>>
>>129848834
kill yourself
>>
>>129848830
Beatles for sale is underrated
>>
>>129848958
I don't really get what you're saying. That's the order of release and that's that. Lots of bands have a dip in quality for an album or even bring out an extra good one every now and then.

Also boybandfag tongues homeless niggers assholes.
>>
>>129848924
The "I'm not mentally ill because it's ironic" troll is the most insufferable of all and also the one most in need of a bullet to the head
>>
>>129848830
Yeah that’s definitely part of it. But also it just isn’t as good as the first two albums.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.