no wonder metal has always had a credibility problem when the biggest "real" band of the 90s dark age were glam rejects
question for Douchebag Darrell... get shot much? lmao.
>they were glam rejects but were arguably the most talented glam band>their pivot to angry chudmetal was probably opportunistic and performative and yet it resulted in great music they were also pioneers for and good atBoth are true and there is no conflict
>>129850732>glam metal rejects>their last glam metal album is one of the few in genre that's actually listenableGlad they managed a smooth transition out of that trainwreck of a scene. Can't say the same for all the other groups.
>>129850732when they started blowing up in the early 90s, their glam past was like this weird rumour/urban legend people weren't sure to believe, those albums were out of print or only regionally released, maybe a magazine would print an old pic of them but we didnt have the internet to go hear what they sounded like
>>129850797Nobody outside Texas knew about 80s Pantera, quite different from Crue.
Pantera's NEVER been "real", you stupid fuKKKing RETARD.
