Well?
steve reich intensifies
Good but I'm tired of hearing it
>>129859007Hate it, the sound of 1970s jazz fusion.
>>129859200I was thinking in prog from 70s but yes.It is undoubtedly the instrument most anchored to a particular period ever. It automatically makes a song outdated.
I like the timbre, it's very pleasant but it's limited by the lack of dynamics.The Wurlitzer on the other hand has better dynamics but worst timbre.
>>129859007Obsoleted by the DX7.
yeah mate it sounds good idk what else to say
>>129859007Stevie WonderSteely DanNo bad music was made on it
>>129860570For the most part yes. The real one has better bass but the DX7 is good enough.
>>129859007This and the hammond organ were way over done.
>>129860570The Rhodes is timeless, DX7 is "80's" in almost every configuration.I love both, but if I could only have one it would be the rhodes and it's not even close.
>>129860581I think Donald Fagen played Wurlitzer, but close enough.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DooF7KmHNPEthese are cool and no one knows about them
>>129860642Pretty sure it was a Rhodes when i saw them in concert but could be wronghttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dp-gpk-dUxE
>>129859007>let me guess you need more?
>>129859007Yeah, I have one, but mine has the Fender logo. Somebody gave it to me. What are you implying... that I should stop shit posting and go practice?
>>129859007Piano?
>>129859007Love it, the sound of 1970s jazz fusion.
>>129859007>recently searched for Rhodes demos>underwater basketweaving forum thread about Rhodes pops upStop following me.
>>129859200>the sound of 1970s jazz fusion.Based
>>129859007heavenly
what does this have to do with K-Pop?
>>129859007 (OP)Love it, the sound of 1970s jazz fusion.
>>129860621>TimelessIt sounds just as 70s as the DX7 sounds 80s.
>>129860642>>129860581>>129859007>>129859596https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b-PKNhuOkKY
