[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/mu/ - Music


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: Front.jpg (68 KB, 500x476)
68 KB
68 KB JPG
What is the natural evolution of symphonic rock? In 2026, I mean.

A relative keeps listening to "Yes", "Genesis", "Pink Floyd" and the usual classics, but I’d like to suggest something new to him. After a quick research, I told him to check out "Steven Wilson" and "Wobbler" with a very positive reception, but I feel like there’s more to it.

Which direction has the genre evolved in, and what tags should I look for? Eclectic rock, atmospheric…?
>>
>>129863991
Steven Wilson never really made symphonic prog, that album is more inspired by King Crimson than Yes or Genesis

If you want modern bands in simlar style you should check Big Big Train, Spock's Beard or Flower Kings
>>
>>129864013
I appreciate the answer. I’ve heard a bit of Big Big Train (Woodcut) and The Flower Kings, but Spock's Beard is new to me. I’ll give it a listen.
>>
Haven't I listened to this album before? Doesn't it start with a sick jazz rock flute lead but then suddenly get very boring so I turned it off? Prog rock is so dorky.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.