[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/mu/ - Music


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_0303.jpg (2.2 MB, 4017x3024)
2.2 MB
2.2 MB JPG
Tonight's listen:

Creedence Clearwater Revival - Live at Woodstock

Beloved by hippies and chuds alike, CCR's appearance at Woodstock was almost inevitable. The Californian swamp larpers were at the peak of their powers in mid-1969 with several major hits under their belt and more soon to come. They were always a solid live act, and their Woodstock performance is no exception. Pretty good recording quality too. While the whole show is strong, it's on the final two songs that things really start choogling. This pair of ten-minute workouts absolutely cooks, and this comes from someone who habitually grumbles about protracted live versions of songs. Woodstock may well be CCR's best official live document, which can't be said of many other bands who performed there.

8.6/10

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dEjzLsdTcUw
>>
FAT MOON RISIN'
>>
plump
>>
You should rate the Woodstock album next.
>>
>>129988357
I used to own a Woodstock compilation but most of it didn't quite turn my crank
>>
>>129987927
The recording quality is in that sweet spot where it's really full bodied and crisp but retaining a rawer, lower-fi edge that perfectly suits CCR's aesthetic. Their other live albums are more clean sounding and lack some of that oomph.
>>
>>129987927
>swamp larpers
heh heh
>>
Talking about Creedence is tricky because everyone wants to believe that it was John Fogerty's singular genius carrying dead weight, but you also don't want to seem like you're making too many excuses for the greedy ungrateful assholes that some of those guys turned out to be (mostly just Stu). But man, they are so fucking underrated as a band, not just vehicles for great songs. Stu and Doug were an incredibly tight and ripping rhythm section and even John would be the first to tell you that Tom's rhythm guitar was the cornerstone of their sound. And for his part he has also said that he gave them all plenty of freedom to develop their own instrumental parts.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uz1EX_VOaFc
>>
total hippy death
>>
>>129987927
Do Scott 3 next
>>
File: GVTF7PUWkAAMtyg.jpg (145 KB, 802x1200)
145 KB
145 KB JPG
Nobody thinks this is a unique or interesting thing you're doing with these stupid fucking threads

Nobody wants to see your fat gut

Your insights on the music are not deep or insightful

Fuck off
>>
>>129991188
Yeah, we need less serious music discussion and more kpop and wpop gooner threads.
>>
>>129991188
cant wait for the next bum on tum
>>
>>129990506
I think a Walker Brothers review would be more interesting for this series. After the Lights Go Out comp might be a good choice.
>>
>>129990506
>>129991276
I'd be more inclined to do Walker Brothers, I think solo Scott's degree of artsiness is lost on me

>>129991221
>>129991229
Thanks Tum Nation
>>
>>129991961
I'm a big Scott Walker fan but I do think the Brothers are underrated these days. It's common for some of his snobbier fans who came to him primarily through his later avant garde stuff to just ignore everything before Scott 3 at the earliest, but there's a very clear line of continuity and evolution from the Walker Bros to Scott's solo work.
>>
>>129987927
Been a CCR fan for 20 years but I had no idea Fogerty could shred until I heard this. I guess there was no space for him to properly unleash on their studio stuff.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.