[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/mu/ - Music


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


I just finished track 8. Unironically when does it get good, it's all been downhill since the first track. Track 8 could have been good if the piano melody that came in at the end had developed more but instead the best part of the track started and then moments after that the track faded out
>>
Use the fan titles, idk what Track 8 is, only tracks I know by number is Cliffs 1, Radiator 2, Rhubarb 3, think Hankie is next?
Dunno what 8 is, but if you said White Blue 1 or Stone in Focus or Tassels I would be like ah that track
>>
>>130007457
it's called blur apparently
>>
>>130007430
this is me at my most gay, but, give it time. i had a similar experience.
>>
>>130008969
nah lol, I'm not giving it any more time. There's much better stuff out there. Hate to be a contrarian but it's just overrated
>>
>>130009033
track 1 is the best track but I agree, its rather lacklustre ambient
>>
>>130009044
Yeah maybe I've just been spoiled by modern ambient but it feels like the people who are praising this must be listening in a vacuum or something. I agree track 1 was definitely the best, I really liked the melody development throughout



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.