>Release 3 albums after 8 year hiatus from 2012-2018First one is good, some weak moments and fillers but overall doesn't ruin the experienceOne member that stayed since 1999 leaves before the second of the new era is released to become a photographer and unironically become the most successful and wealthy of the four>they clearly sound different because of it>two literally who collaborators participate the first and second ones - album itself is boring except for 3 tracks>third is released this year and has 16 tracks, basically half of the lp is filler and the singer are four-on-the-floor dance songs that a 12 year old with ableton could do in 1 day>from the 16 tracks only 2 have songwriting credits with more than one member>all the three members also live in different regions around the world and this probably affects the chemistryLiterally over for ladytron chuds.
m'ladytron
>>130104584
>>130104584We should just leave them the way that we found them back when they were seventeen.
They should release a whole album with Bulgarian lyricsIf that album was another Kraftwerk rip-off, it would be perfect
Heck yeah Ladytron. I stopped listening to them in 2008 with Velocifero. Any records after that by them worth listening to?
>>130105499The first four track of time's arrow are good; ~8 of the self-title are really worth it, with "run" being the most obvious filler of the album; paradises is mid from beginning to end but kingdom undersea, death in london and for for a life in london got a bit of my attention
>>130104584the album is okay, solid 7/10, probably the best of their reunion material
I think Ladytron are overrated, you wouldn't like them as much if you weren't in your teens when you started listening to them.
always fascinating how these literal whos with sub 700k monthly listeners get replies but if you wanna discuss someone with 20 million "no one ever heard of this"
>>130105712I had an obsession phase with then in my late teens to early 20s but it faded out to be replaced by pink floyd, type o negative and tool. I think their (peak era) music is good enough for you to be impressed and enjoy but there isn't that uniqueness and depth that hooks so you won't see them as that "catchy band with catchy tunes i heard once"
>>130105732There's literally astroturfed k-poop threads every microsecond here, brother.
>>130104812I just wish they recreated the experimental and carelesss vibe of 604 instead of the same dance floor booty shaker that was the standard from light & magic forwards. They didnt sound like a band pressured by labels and fame there
>>130105732>literal whosYou fuckin' zoomer; they were iconic as fuck.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3C01FsUjnQw
>>130109857>Sabrina who? Chappell who? Rodrigo who? Dua who? Tay tay? What? Wake up honey it's 2002 and this dropped!
>>130105637I still think they can do better despite the age of everybody
>>130106516>Mira's AroyoImagine...
Bumping, haven't listened yet
>>130118759>yes anon, listen to my velvety contralto voice and become subconsciously pro-israelhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eWka5O9ptOI&t=1
>>130104584qrd?
>>130125230Mid or mid-to-good if you are into dancey stuff (atleasf for the singles). Lets say you wouldn't cringe if a DJ or a guy that got the aux cord played it and you both would even vibe together.
