[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/mu/ - Music


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


About once a year, Jerry Wexler tries to bring a fundamentally soulful white female pop singer up to the minute. Sometimes it works (Dusty in Memphis, the all-time rock-era torch record), sometimes it doesn't (Cher, Lulu). This one almost works, not because DeShannon is such a terrific singer--although she's a lot more terrific with Wexler and friends pushing her from the bottom--but because for the first time in a while she's written a few terrific songs. Nothing wrong with her up-to-the-minute country-soul covers of Van Morrison, Neil Young, and their lessers, and nothing just right either. When she launches into her own "Vanilla 'Olay" or "Anna Karina," though, she sounds like time is on her side. B
>>
>>130139331
I wouldn't say her "The Weight" beats Aretha's and she should have never attempted "Sunshine of Your Love."
>>
>>130139331
Hello Grok, give me a more adult Brenda Lee who can write songs.
>>
>>130139331
Another boring Christagu review
>>
>>130139487
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h7C4ultNibk

Just if you were wondering this was Jackie's first-ever single from 1959 and she does get rather Brenda-like at points especially in the last verse.
>>
>>130139437
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iKhuEkYCN4s

Arrangements are better and it's faster.
>>
>>130139437
>if Aretha was a Millenial she would be Lizzo
>if Jackie was a Millenial she'd be Miley Cyrus and both would perform some generic Martin/Antonoff slop
That's a depressing thought.
>>
>>130139331
Golly I wonder just what that cover art was stolen from.
>>
this board never hardly mentions Jackie DeShannon though
>>
>>130139331
call it what you will but i find her early 60s teenybopper records more listenable than the adult pop she made in 65 onward
>>
>>130140703
She quit at the right time and thankfully didn't make horrible 80s pop with synths and giant drums.
>>
>>130140703
Agreed, I actually really enjoy her early 60's stuff, but after What the World Needs Now became a smash hit, she became just another boring adult contemporary singer

Her Capitol and Atlantic recordings represent a bit of an upswing though, like Cuckgau said she got back to writing decent songs
>>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3pfDbDJefnI
This was her first charting hit although as anon said she'd recorded since 59 and yeah she was half a Brenda Lee clone in the early days.
>>
>>130141112
Blatant copy of Patsy's version

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=v51davRH9rQ
>>
>>130139331
>Sometimes it works (Dusty in Memphis, the all-time rock-era torch record),
why critics worshiped that thing so much i'll never know
>>
>>130141142
There was a thread talking about it just last night (you were probably in it since this board has like 20 users outside of Kpop)

IMO it's the least Memphis-sounding record ever recorded at American Sound Studios, basically the only actually soulful-sounding song on it is Preacher Man
>>
>>130139487
Liberty were ok with her writing for other people but they insisted she be strictly an interpreter on her own recordings. made no sense really.
>>
File: IMG_0359.jpg (2.9 MB, 4284x3929)
2.9 MB JPG
>>130141020
Here's my Jackie collection by the way, I'm still searching for a copy of her Capitol album on CD



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.