[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/mu/ - Music
Return Catalog Bottom Refresh
Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.
[Advertise on 4chan]
[Return] [Catalog] [Bottom]
Anonymous Archived
 No.130181321
File: 82ShCnbL.png (537 KB, 1026x1166)
537 KB PNG
No.130181321 Archived
In 2030, Pitchfork will publish another "albums rescored" special feature and give The New Abnormal a 9.2.
It was released 6 years ago and it has aged like fine wine.
Remember when Pitchfork rescored Daft Punk - Discovery from 6.4 to 10.
https://pitchfork.com/features/lists-and-guides/pitchfork-reviews-rescored/
>>
Anonymous
 No.130182340
No.130182340
>>130181321
Difference is Discovery changed pop music and house music at the same time.
It had a long tail of influence.

What is even inspired by The New Abnormal?
I like it, I think it's pretty catchy, but be real if you think they'd have any reason to remember it in decades to come.
[Return] [Catalog] [Top]
Post a Reply
Return Catalog Top Refresh
[Advertise on 4chan]
Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.